Raffaele Giuseppe Cestari, Andrea Castelletti, Simone Formentin
{"title":"Non-linear multi-objective Bayesian MPC of water reservoir systems","authors":"Raffaele Giuseppe Cestari, Andrea Castelletti, Simone Formentin","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcon.2025.101205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing multiple conflicting objectives in online control problems is a challenge. Traditional causal approaches optimize cost functions defined as a weighted sum of cost contributions, each representing a control objective. However, the way cost weights are chosen is traditionally heuristic, based at most on sensitivity analyses. In the literature, some solutions optimize weights based on multi-objective genetic algorithms (NSGA-II). Still, these strategies inherit the well-known deterioration phenomenon in which NSGA-II occurs. Here, we introduce a novel Non-Linear Model Predictive Control (NLMPC) formulation that automatically selects the optimal weight combination, i.e., the one resulting in the best-aggregated performance. We run <span><math><mi>N</mi></math></span> NLMPC controllers simultaneously at each time step, calibrating their cost function weights using a Bayesian Optimization that optimizes the Pareto frontier’s Hypervolume and Additive Epsilon Indicator. We then select the controller, minimizing the trade-off between objectives. We apply our approach to the Red River system, a highly non-linear and multipurpose water resource system in Vietnam. The proposed tuning algorithm overcomes the literature deterioration issue and validation over six years of observational data shows that our method minimizes the aggregated normalized cost, with and without disturbance knowledge assumption. The back-test of experimental data finally validates our control strategy, demonstrating a dominating solution against historical control.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50489,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Control","volume":"83 ","pages":"Article 101205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0947358025000330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Addressing multiple conflicting objectives in online control problems is a challenge. Traditional causal approaches optimize cost functions defined as a weighted sum of cost contributions, each representing a control objective. However, the way cost weights are chosen is traditionally heuristic, based at most on sensitivity analyses. In the literature, some solutions optimize weights based on multi-objective genetic algorithms (NSGA-II). Still, these strategies inherit the well-known deterioration phenomenon in which NSGA-II occurs. Here, we introduce a novel Non-Linear Model Predictive Control (NLMPC) formulation that automatically selects the optimal weight combination, i.e., the one resulting in the best-aggregated performance. We run NLMPC controllers simultaneously at each time step, calibrating their cost function weights using a Bayesian Optimization that optimizes the Pareto frontier’s Hypervolume and Additive Epsilon Indicator. We then select the controller, minimizing the trade-off between objectives. We apply our approach to the Red River system, a highly non-linear and multipurpose water resource system in Vietnam. The proposed tuning algorithm overcomes the literature deterioration issue and validation over six years of observational data shows that our method minimizes the aggregated normalized cost, with and without disturbance knowledge assumption. The back-test of experimental data finally validates our control strategy, demonstrating a dominating solution against historical control.
期刊介绍:
The European Control Association (EUCA) has among its objectives to promote the development of the discipline. Apart from the European Control Conferences, the European Journal of Control is the Association''s main channel for the dissemination of important contributions in the field.
The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality papers on the theory and practice of control and systems engineering.
The scope of the Journal will be wide and cover all aspects of the discipline including methodologies, techniques and applications.
Research in control and systems engineering is necessary to develop new concepts and tools which enhance our understanding and improve our ability to design and implement high performance control systems. Submitted papers should stress the practical motivations and relevance of their results.
The design and implementation of a successful control system requires the use of a range of techniques:
Modelling
Robustness Analysis
Identification
Optimization
Control Law Design
Numerical analysis
Fault Detection, and so on.