Tobacco treatment and policies in mental health and substance use treatment facilities in the US

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Dian Gu , Fan Xia , Maya Vijayaraghavan
{"title":"Tobacco treatment and policies in mental health and substance use treatment facilities in the US","authors":"Dian Gu ,&nbsp;Fan Xia ,&nbsp;Maya Vijayaraghavan","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The prevalence of tobacco use among people with mental health and substance use disorders in the US is high. State- and facility-level factors could be associated with the provision of tobacco treatment and tobacco-free grounds policy in mental health and substance use treatment facilities. We estimated the latest prevalence of, and factors associated with tobacco treatment provision and tobacco-free grounds policies in these facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study used data from the 2021–2022 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey. Two multivariate Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were employed to estimate state- and facility-level factors associated with two outcomes: 1) provision of any tobacco treatment (screening, behavior counseling, or pharmacotherapy), and 2) having a tobacco-free grounds policy.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among over 17,300 facilities, 87.2 % provided tobacco treatment, and 38.6 % implemented tobacco-free grounds policies. Private for-profit facilities were less likely to provide tobacco treatment (Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] 0.87, 95 % CI 0.86–0.89). Private for-profit and nonprofit facilities, those licensed by state or tribal health agencies, and those in tobacco nation states were less likely to implement tobacco-free grounds policies. In contrast, facilities with opioid treatment programs were more likely to achieve both outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Disparities exist in providing tobacco treatment and tobacco-free ground policies, particularly in privately owned facilities. Payers should incentivize the adoption of tobacco treatment and tobacco-free campus policies, and states should incorporate these requirements into licensure and/or accreditation standards for mental health and substance use treatment facilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 112639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625000924","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of tobacco use among people with mental health and substance use disorders in the US is high. State- and facility-level factors could be associated with the provision of tobacco treatment and tobacco-free grounds policy in mental health and substance use treatment facilities. We estimated the latest prevalence of, and factors associated with tobacco treatment provision and tobacco-free grounds policies in these facilities.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from the 2021–2022 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey. Two multivariate Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were employed to estimate state- and facility-level factors associated with two outcomes: 1) provision of any tobacco treatment (screening, behavior counseling, or pharmacotherapy), and 2) having a tobacco-free grounds policy.

Results

Among over 17,300 facilities, 87.2 % provided tobacco treatment, and 38.6 % implemented tobacco-free grounds policies. Private for-profit facilities were less likely to provide tobacco treatment (Adjusted Risk Ratio [ARR] 0.87, 95 % CI 0.86–0.89). Private for-profit and nonprofit facilities, those licensed by state or tribal health agencies, and those in tobacco nation states were less likely to implement tobacco-free grounds policies. In contrast, facilities with opioid treatment programs were more likely to achieve both outcomes.

Conclusions

Disparities exist in providing tobacco treatment and tobacco-free ground policies, particularly in privately owned facilities. Payers should incentivize the adoption of tobacco treatment and tobacco-free campus policies, and states should incorporate these requirements into licensure and/or accreditation standards for mental health and substance use treatment facilities.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信