Afonso Pereira, Marta Cunha, Alessia Cuccaro, Hugo C. Vieira, Yide He, Amadeu M.V.M. Soares, Rosa Freitas
{"title":"The Ecotoxicological effects of Diclofenac and Gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: What Does In Vivo Reveal That In Vitro Fails to Show?","authors":"Afonso Pereira, Marta Cunha, Alessia Cuccaro, Hugo C. Vieira, Yide He, Amadeu M.V.M. Soares, Rosa Freitas","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the toxicological effects of diclofenac (DIC) and gentamicin (GEN) on the gills (G) and digestive gland (DG) of <em>Mytilus galloprovincialis</em> through <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> assays. Biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, metabolic capacity and neurotoxicity were evaluated at the end of each assay. For both assays, Principal coordinates analysis (PCO) highlighted distinct biochemical profiles between G and DG, mostly related to higher basal values for several biomarkers in DG. Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) Index revealed higher scores in G for the <em>in vitro</em> assay, especially after exposure to GEN. In the <em>in vivo</em> assay the highest scores were recorded in DG, especially in the presence of DIC. The distinct responses of G and DG underscore their roles in respiration and detoxification, with G being more sensitive to acute stress and DG exhibiting greater adaptive capacity over time. Furthermore, it appears that GEN caused the greatest impact on G after the <em>in vitro</em> assay, while DIC had the most significant effect on DG following the <em>in vivo</em> experiment. <em>In vitro</em> assays demonstrated limited oxidative stress and cellular damage, while <em>in vivo</em> results highlighted substantial metabolic depression and biomarker variability under prolonged exposure. When analyzed individually, the <em>in vitro</em> assay showed a clearer distinction between the two contaminants, especially in the DG. The findings underscore the differential vulnerability and adaptive capacities of G and DG, attributed to their respective roles in respiration and detoxification. These results emphasize the complementary nature of <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> approaches, with the former providing mechanistic insights and the latter reflecting systemic organismal responses. This study highlights the importance of a multi-dimensional approach, combining both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em> methodologies, to better understand tissue-specific toxicity and the broader ecological consequences of pharmaceutical contamination.","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the toxicological effects of diclofenac (DIC) and gentamicin (GEN) on the gills (G) and digestive gland (DG) of Mytilus galloprovincialis through in vitro and in vivo assays. Biochemical markers related to oxidative stress, metabolic capacity and neurotoxicity were evaluated at the end of each assay. For both assays, Principal coordinates analysis (PCO) highlighted distinct biochemical profiles between G and DG, mostly related to higher basal values for several biomarkers in DG. Integrated Biomarker Response (IBR) Index revealed higher scores in G for the in vitro assay, especially after exposure to GEN. In the in vivo assay the highest scores were recorded in DG, especially in the presence of DIC. The distinct responses of G and DG underscore their roles in respiration and detoxification, with G being more sensitive to acute stress and DG exhibiting greater adaptive capacity over time. Furthermore, it appears that GEN caused the greatest impact on G after the in vitro assay, while DIC had the most significant effect on DG following the in vivo experiment. In vitro assays demonstrated limited oxidative stress and cellular damage, while in vivo results highlighted substantial metabolic depression and biomarker variability under prolonged exposure. When analyzed individually, the in vitro assay showed a clearer distinction between the two contaminants, especially in the DG. The findings underscore the differential vulnerability and adaptive capacities of G and DG, attributed to their respective roles in respiration and detoxification. These results emphasize the complementary nature of in vitro and in vivo approaches, with the former providing mechanistic insights and the latter reflecting systemic organismal responses. This study highlights the importance of a multi-dimensional approach, combining both in vitro and in vivo methodologies, to better understand tissue-specific toxicity and the broader ecological consequences of pharmaceutical contamination.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Subject areas include, but are not limited to:
• Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies;
• Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change;
• Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest;
• New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.