New ways to use imaging data in cardiovascular research: survey of opinions on federated learning and synthetic data.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf012
Michelle C Williams, Jacqueline A L MacArthur, Ross Forsyth, Steffen E Petersen
{"title":"New ways to use imaging data in cardiovascular research: survey of opinions on federated learning and synthetic data.","authors":"Michelle C Williams, Jacqueline A L MacArthur, Ross Forsyth, Steffen E Petersen","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Federated learning and the creation of synthetic data are emerging tools, which may enhance the use of imaging data in cardiovascular research. This study sought to understand the perspectives of cardiovascular imaging researchers on the potential benefits and challenges associated with these technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre conducted a series of online surveys and a virtual workshop to gather insights from stakeholders involved in cardiovascular imaging research about federated learning and synthetic data generation. The federated learning survey included 67 respondents: 18% (<i>n</i> = 12) were currently using federated learning, 4% (<i>n</i> = 3) had previously used it, 31% (<i>n</i> = 21) were planning to use it, and 46% (<i>n</i> = 31) were neither using nor planning to use it. Highlighted benefits included data privacy and enhanced collaboration, while challenges included data heterogeneity and technical complexity. The synthetic data survey had 22 respondents: 50% (<i>n</i> = 11) were currently using synthetic imaging data, 36% (<i>n</i> = 8) expressed interest in using it, and 14% (<i>n</i> = 3) thought it should not be used. Amongst the respondents, 50% had created synthetic imaging data and 45% had used it in cardiovascular research. Advantages cited included privacy preservation, increased dataset size and diversity, improved data access, and reduced administrative burden. Concerns included potential biases, trust issues, privacy concerns, and the fact that the images were not real and may have limited diversity or quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Federated learning and synthetic data offer opportunities for advancing cardiovascular imaging research by addressing data privacy concerns and expanding data availability. However, challenges must be addressed to realize their full potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"qyaf012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11891443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Federated learning and the creation of synthetic data are emerging tools, which may enhance the use of imaging data in cardiovascular research. This study sought to understand the perspectives of cardiovascular imaging researchers on the potential benefits and challenges associated with these technologies.

Methods and results: The British Heart Foundation Data Science Centre conducted a series of online surveys and a virtual workshop to gather insights from stakeholders involved in cardiovascular imaging research about federated learning and synthetic data generation. The federated learning survey included 67 respondents: 18% (n = 12) were currently using federated learning, 4% (n = 3) had previously used it, 31% (n = 21) were planning to use it, and 46% (n = 31) were neither using nor planning to use it. Highlighted benefits included data privacy and enhanced collaboration, while challenges included data heterogeneity and technical complexity. The synthetic data survey had 22 respondents: 50% (n = 11) were currently using synthetic imaging data, 36% (n = 8) expressed interest in using it, and 14% (n = 3) thought it should not be used. Amongst the respondents, 50% had created synthetic imaging data and 45% had used it in cardiovascular research. Advantages cited included privacy preservation, increased dataset size and diversity, improved data access, and reduced administrative burden. Concerns included potential biases, trust issues, privacy concerns, and the fact that the images were not real and may have limited diversity or quality.

Conclusion: Federated learning and synthetic data offer opportunities for advancing cardiovascular imaging research by addressing data privacy concerns and expanding data availability. However, challenges must be addressed to realize their full potential.

在心血管研究中使用成像数据的新途径:对联合学习和合成数据的意见调查。
目的:联合学习和合成数据的创建是新兴的工具,可以增强心血管研究中成像数据的使用。本研究旨在了解心血管成像研究人员对这些技术的潜在益处和挑战的看法。方法和结果:英国心脏基金会数据科学中心进行了一系列在线调查和虚拟研讨会,以收集参与心血管成像研究的利益相关者关于联合学习和合成数据生成的见解。联邦学习调查包括67名受访者:18% (n = 12)目前正在使用联邦学习,4% (n = 3)以前使用过,31% (n = 21)计划使用它,46% (n = 31)既不使用也不打算使用它。突出的好处包括数据隐私和增强协作,而挑战包括数据异构和技术复杂性。合成数据调查共有22名受访者:50% (n = 11)目前正在使用合成成像数据,36% (n = 8)表示有兴趣使用,14% (n = 3)认为不应该使用。在受访者中,50%的人创建了合成成像数据,45%的人将其用于心血管研究。所引用的优点包括保护隐私、增加数据集大小和多样性、改进数据访问和减少管理负担。人们担心的问题包括潜在的偏见、信任问题、隐私问题,以及照片不是真实的、可能多样性或质量有限的事实。结论:通过解决数据隐私问题和扩大数据可用性,联邦学习和合成数据为推进心血管成像研究提供了机会。然而,必须应对挑战,以充分发挥其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信