Progression in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: Prevalence and Indicators in the Initial Evaluation in a Brazilian Multicentric Cohort.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-03-09 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.80290
Ana C Resende, Soraya Cordero, Eliane V Mancuzo, Karin M Storrer, Maria A Moreira, Fernanda M Baptista, Rimarcs Ferreira, Maria Raquel Soares, Carlos Alberto A Pereira
{"title":"Progression in Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Diseases: Prevalence and Indicators in the Initial Evaluation in a Brazilian Multicentric Cohort.","authors":"Ana C Resende, Soraya Cordero, Eliane V Mancuzo, Karin M Storrer, Maria A Moreira, Fernanda M Baptista, Rimarcs Ferreira, Maria Raquel Soares, Carlos Alberto A Pereira","doi":"10.7759/cureus.80290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to determine the prevalence of progression in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the findings at diagnosis most associated with progression after two years of follow-up in a large Brazilian cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multicenter observational study in Brazil. Progression was defined after two years of follow-up. We excluded patients with an initial peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of less than 88% or an initial forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 45%. Diagnoses were made by multidisciplinary discussion. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were included for comparison. At least one of the following events was indicative of progressive ILD: (1) a relative decrease in FVC of 10% or more, (2) worsening dyspnea, (3) a greater extent of fibrotic findings on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), (4) initiation of oxygen, and (5) death attributed to ILD. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for progressive fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 61.7±12.3 years, and 69.5% had Velcro crackles. The mean FVC was 71.6±15.8%, and 26.1% showed honeycombing on HRCT. After two years of follow-up, 40.5% of patients (n=154) showed disease progression. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) was the most progressive disease (52%), and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) was the least progressive (25%). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher score for dyspnea, crackles, and SpO2 at rest ≤94% and ≤85% at the end of exercise were significant indicators of progression. Diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in 172 cases, with values <55% predicting a high odds ratio for progression (OR=4.03; 2.10-7.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Brazil, FHP is the most progressive disease and CTD-ILD is the least progressive after two years of follow-up. The degree of dyspnea, crackles, SpO2 at rest and during exercise, and DLCO at baseline are associated with progressive disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 3","pages":"e80290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This retrospective study aimed to determine the prevalence of progression in fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the findings at diagnosis most associated with progression after two years of follow-up in a large Brazilian cohort.

Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter observational study in Brazil. Progression was defined after two years of follow-up. We excluded patients with an initial peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of less than 88% or an initial forced vital capacity (FVC) of less than 45%. Diagnoses were made by multidisciplinary discussion. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were included for comparison. At least one of the following events was indicative of progressive ILD: (1) a relative decrease in FVC of 10% or more, (2) worsening dyspnea, (3) a greater extent of fibrotic findings on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), (4) initiation of oxygen, and (5) death attributed to ILD. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for progressive fibrosis.

Results: The mean age of patients was 61.7±12.3 years, and 69.5% had Velcro crackles. The mean FVC was 71.6±15.8%, and 26.1% showed honeycombing on HRCT. After two years of follow-up, 40.5% of patients (n=154) showed disease progression. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) was the most progressive disease (52%), and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) was the least progressive (25%). Multivariate analysis showed that a higher score for dyspnea, crackles, and SpO2 at rest ≤94% and ≤85% at the end of exercise were significant indicators of progression. Diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in 172 cases, with values <55% predicting a high odds ratio for progression (OR=4.03; 2.10-7.69).

Conclusion: In Brazil, FHP is the most progressive disease and CTD-ILD is the least progressive after two years of follow-up. The degree of dyspnea, crackles, SpO2 at rest and during exercise, and DLCO at baseline are associated with progressive disease.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信