Reducing risks through regulatory cooperation: a review of bilateral regulatory cooperation between the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Malgorzata Sneve, Graham Smith
{"title":"Reducing risks through regulatory cooperation: a review of bilateral regulatory cooperation between the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union.","authors":"Malgorzata Sneve, Graham Smith","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/adbe82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Norwegian government has maintained a plan of action on nuclear safety and security for over 25 years. The need for such a plan grew from extensive nuclear activities during the Cold War, both civil and military, that led eventually to significant amounts of radioactive waste (RW) and nuclear material being stored in unsafe conditions in Northwest Russia. As part of the program to implement the plan of action, the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has maintained a program of bilateral regulatory cooperation with corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union for over 25 years. This paper reviews the background to that regulatory program, identifies the main radiologically hazardous objects and the related regulatory challenges, and then documents how bilateral cooperation has contributed to the substantial progress made in risk reduction. The review then considers how bilateral work has contributed to and benefitted from sharing results and experience with international partners and draws conclusions and lessons for future work. The primary conclusion is that bilateral regulatory cooperation has supported reduction of radiation and nuclear risks at a range of complex legacy sites and facilities in countries of the former Soviet Union. Key to this process has been a clear strategy to help build and maintain an up-to-date, robust and independent regulatory process. Only with well-coordinated regulatory bodies with clear responsibilities and functions is it possible to address the diverse threats effectively. Among the most radiologically significant sites and facilities where risk has been significantly reduced or eliminated are the LEPSE spent fuel and RW storage vessel, the site for temporary storage for spent fuel and RW at Andreeva Bay, and the very large radio-isotope thermo-electric generators sources previously used in navigational devices all across the Russian arctic coastline. Noting the clear potential for transboundary impacts, this represents a substantial regional benefit. Following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation in February 2022, the bilateral cooperation activities with Russian authorities ceased. Using the successfully developed regulatory working methods and experience gained in Russia, substantial regulatory enhancement has also been achieved in countries of Central Asia and Ukraine, commencing in 2008 and 2014 respectively. Continuing such support in Ukraine, in the face of new regulatory challenges arising due to the full-scale Russian invasion, remains a high priority for the DSA within the Norwegian Nansen program.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/adbe82","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Norwegian government has maintained a plan of action on nuclear safety and security for over 25 years. The need for such a plan grew from extensive nuclear activities during the Cold War, both civil and military, that led eventually to significant amounts of radioactive waste (RW) and nuclear material being stored in unsafe conditions in Northwest Russia. As part of the program to implement the plan of action, the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has maintained a program of bilateral regulatory cooperation with corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union for over 25 years. This paper reviews the background to that regulatory program, identifies the main radiologically hazardous objects and the related regulatory challenges, and then documents how bilateral cooperation has contributed to the substantial progress made in risk reduction. The review then considers how bilateral work has contributed to and benefitted from sharing results and experience with international partners and draws conclusions and lessons for future work. The primary conclusion is that bilateral regulatory cooperation has supported reduction of radiation and nuclear risks at a range of complex legacy sites and facilities in countries of the former Soviet Union. Key to this process has been a clear strategy to help build and maintain an up-to-date, robust and independent regulatory process. Only with well-coordinated regulatory bodies with clear responsibilities and functions is it possible to address the diverse threats effectively. Among the most radiologically significant sites and facilities where risk has been significantly reduced or eliminated are the LEPSE spent fuel and RW storage vessel, the site for temporary storage for spent fuel and RW at Andreeva Bay, and the very large radio-isotope thermo-electric generators sources previously used in navigational devices all across the Russian arctic coastline. Noting the clear potential for transboundary impacts, this represents a substantial regional benefit. Following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation in February 2022, the bilateral cooperation activities with Russian authorities ceased. Using the successfully developed regulatory working methods and experience gained in Russia, substantial regulatory enhancement has also been achieved in countries of Central Asia and Ukraine, commencing in 2008 and 2014 respectively. Continuing such support in Ukraine, in the face of new regulatory challenges arising due to the full-scale Russian invasion, remains a high priority for the DSA within the Norwegian Nansen program.

通过管制合作减少风险:审查挪威辐射和核安全局与前苏联各国有关当局之间的双边管制合作。
25年来,挪威政府一直在实施核安全与核安保行动计划。对这样一个计划的需求源于冷战期间广泛的民用和军用核活动,这些活动最终导致大量放射性废物和核材料被储存在俄罗斯西北部不安全的环境中。作为实施行动计划方案的一部分,挪威辐射和核安全局25年来一直与前苏联国家的相应当局保持着双边监管合作方案。本文回顾了该监管计划的背景,确定了主要的放射性危险物体和相关的监管挑战,然后记录了双边合作如何促进在降低风险方面取得实质性进展。然后,审查审议了双边工作如何促进与国际伙伴分享成果和经验并从中受益,并为今后的工作得出结论和教训。主要结论是,双边监管合作支持在前苏联国家的一系列复杂的遗留场址和设施中减少辐射和核风险。这一过程的关键是制定一项明确的战略,以帮助建立和维持一个最新的、健全的和独立的监管程序。只有协调良好、职责明确的监管机构,才有可能有效地应对各种威胁。在放射性方面最重要的地点和设施中,风险已显著降低或消除的是Lepse乏燃料和放射性废物储存容器,安德列耶娃湾临时储存乏燃料和放射性废物的场所,以及以前在俄罗斯北极海岸线上所有导航设备中使用的超大型放射性同位素热电发电机源。考虑到跨界影响的明显潜力,这代表了一个巨大的区域利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信