Reducing risks through regulatory cooperation: A review of bilateral regulatory cooperation between the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Malgorzata K Sneve, Graham M Smith
{"title":"Reducing risks through regulatory cooperation: A review of bilateral regulatory cooperation between the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union.","authors":"Malgorzata K Sneve, Graham M Smith","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/adbe82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Norwegian government has maintained a plan of action on nuclear safety and security for over 25 years. The need for such a plan grew from extensive nuclear activities during the Cold War, both civil and military, that led eventually to significant amounts of radioactive waste and nuclear material being stored in unsafe conditions in northwest Russia. As part of the program to implement the plan of action, the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has maintained a program of bilateral regulatory cooperation with corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union for over 25 years. &#xD;&#xD;This paper reviews the background to that regulatory program, identifies the main radiologically hazardous objects and the related regulatory challenges, and then documents how bilateral cooperation has contributed to the substantial progress made in risk reduction. The review then considers how bilateral work has contributed to and benefitted from sharing results and experience with international partners and draws conclusions and lessons for future work.&#xD;&#xD;The primary conclusion is that bilateral regulatory cooperation has supported reduction of radiation and nuclear risks at a range of complex legacy sites and facilities in countries of the former Soviet Union. Key to this process has been a clear strategy to help build and maintain an up-to-date, robust and independent regulatory process. Only with well-coordinated regulatory bodies with clear responsibilities and functions is it possible to address the diverse threats effectively. &#xD;&#xD;Among the most radiologically significant sites and facilities where risk has been significantly reduced or eliminated are the Lepse spent fuel and radioactive waste storage vessel, the site for temporary storage for spent fuel and radioactive waste at Andreeva Bay, and the very large radio-isotope thermo-electric generators sources previously used in navigational devices all across the Russian arctic coastline. Noting the clear potential for transboundary impacts, this represents a substantial regional benefit.&#xD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/adbe82","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Norwegian government has maintained a plan of action on nuclear safety and security for over 25 years. The need for such a plan grew from extensive nuclear activities during the Cold War, both civil and military, that led eventually to significant amounts of radioactive waste and nuclear material being stored in unsafe conditions in northwest Russia. As part of the program to implement the plan of action, the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has maintained a program of bilateral regulatory cooperation with corresponding authorities in countries of the former Soviet Union for over 25 years. This paper reviews the background to that regulatory program, identifies the main radiologically hazardous objects and the related regulatory challenges, and then documents how bilateral cooperation has contributed to the substantial progress made in risk reduction. The review then considers how bilateral work has contributed to and benefitted from sharing results and experience with international partners and draws conclusions and lessons for future work. The primary conclusion is that bilateral regulatory cooperation has supported reduction of radiation and nuclear risks at a range of complex legacy sites and facilities in countries of the former Soviet Union. Key to this process has been a clear strategy to help build and maintain an up-to-date, robust and independent regulatory process. Only with well-coordinated regulatory bodies with clear responsibilities and functions is it possible to address the diverse threats effectively. Among the most radiologically significant sites and facilities where risk has been significantly reduced or eliminated are the Lepse spent fuel and radioactive waste storage vessel, the site for temporary storage for spent fuel and radioactive waste at Andreeva Bay, and the very large radio-isotope thermo-electric generators sources previously used in navigational devices all across the Russian arctic coastline. Noting the clear potential for transboundary impacts, this represents a substantial regional benefit. .

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信