Impact of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pleural Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Multimodality Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Berta Mosleh, Stefan Schwarz, Anna Cho, Katharina Sinn, Ariane Steindl, Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller, Wolfgang J Köstler, Karin Dieckmann, Martin Heilmann, Joachim Widder, Daniela Gompelmann, Clemens Aigner, Thomas Klikovits, Mir Alireza Hoda
{"title":"Impact of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pleural Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy in Multimodality Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.","authors":"Berta Mosleh, Stefan Schwarz, Anna Cho, Katharina Sinn, Ariane Steindl, Sabine Zöchbauer-Müller, Wolfgang J Köstler, Karin Dieckmann, Martin Heilmann, Joachim Widder, Daniela Gompelmann, Clemens Aigner, Thomas Klikovits, Mir Alireza Hoda","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few malignancies provoke as many controversies about treatment as pleural mesothelioma. There is limited experience with novel radiotherapy techniques worldwide in adjuvant and particularly in neoadjuvant settings within multimodality treatment. The objective of the current study was to investigate the long-term outcome of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with macroscopic complete resection with or without chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 59 patients who were diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma and underwent multimodality treatment including macroscopic complete resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant IMRT between 2005 and 2019 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 59 patients (median age 59 years; IQR 54-66, male, n = 48; 81%) were included. Forty-seven patients underwent trimodality treatment consisting of induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and adjuvant IMRT. Novel neoadjuvant IMRT with (n = 9) or without (n = 3) chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 12 patients. Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 23.2 months (95% CI; 18.1-28.2) and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 33% and 28%, respectively. Survival was comparable between therapies including neoadjuvant versus adjuvant IMRT (median OS 17.5 vs. 24.0 months, p = 0.39).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant pleural IMRT has been investigated as a novel treatment option for highly selected cases in pleural mesothelioma. Neoadjuvant IMRT was effective and safe in patients treated in a high-volume institution but showed no relevant survival benefit compared to adjuvant IMRT within multimodality treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 5","pages":"e70024"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few malignancies provoke as many controversies about treatment as pleural mesothelioma. There is limited experience with novel radiotherapy techniques worldwide in adjuvant and particularly in neoadjuvant settings within multimodality treatment. The objective of the current study was to investigate the long-term outcome of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) combined with macroscopic complete resection with or without chemotherapy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a consecutive cohort of 59 patients who were diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma and underwent multimodality treatment including macroscopic complete resection and neoadjuvant or adjuvant IMRT between 2005 and 2019 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Results: In total, 59 patients (median age 59 years; IQR 54-66, male, n = 48; 81%) were included. Forty-seven patients underwent trimodality treatment consisting of induction chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy, and adjuvant IMRT. Novel neoadjuvant IMRT with (n = 9) or without (n = 3) chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy was performed in 12 patients. Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 23.2 months (95% CI; 18.1-28.2) and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 33% and 28%, respectively. Survival was comparable between therapies including neoadjuvant versus adjuvant IMRT (median OS 17.5 vs. 24.0 months, p = 0.39).

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant pleural IMRT has been investigated as a novel treatment option for highly selected cases in pleural mesothelioma. Neoadjuvant IMRT was effective and safe in patients treated in a high-volume institution but showed no relevant survival benefit compared to adjuvant IMRT within multimodality treatment.

新辅助和辅助胸膜调强放疗在多模式治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤中的影响。
背景:很少有恶性肿瘤像胸膜间皮瘤那样引起如此多的治疗争议。在世界范围内,新的放疗技术在辅助治疗方面的经验有限,特别是在多模式治疗的新辅助治疗方面。本研究的目的是探讨新辅助和辅助胸膜调强放疗(IMRT)联合宏观完全切除伴或不伴化疗的长期疗效。方法:我们回顾性分析了奥地利维也纳医科大学胸外科2005年至2019年间诊断为胸膜间皮瘤并接受包括宏观完全切除和新辅助或辅助IMRT在内的多模式治疗的59例连续队列患者。结果:共59例患者(中位年龄59岁;IQR 54-66,男性,n = 48;81%)。47例患者接受了诱导化疗、胸膜外全肺切除术和辅助IMRT的三段式治疗。12例患者行新型新辅助IMRT伴化疗(n = 9)或不伴化疗(n = 3)后胸膜外全肺切除术。所有患者的中位总生存期(OS)为23.2个月(95% CI;18.1 ~ 28.2), 3年和5年生存率分别为33%和28%。包括新辅助和辅助IMRT在内的两种治疗的生存率相当(中位生存期17.5个月vs. 24.0个月,p = 0.39)。结论:新辅助胸膜IMRT已被研究作为胸膜间皮瘤高选择性病例的一种新的治疗选择。新辅助IMRT在大容量机构治疗的患者中是有效和安全的,但与多模式治疗中的辅助IMRT相比,没有相关的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thoracic Cancer
Thoracic Cancer ONCOLOGY-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
439
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society. The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信