Metagenomic insights of microbial functions under conventional and conservation agriculture.

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Samrendra Singh Thakur, Stefany Solano González, Prashanth Suravajhala, Subodh Kumar Jain, Shweta Yadav, Karthik Sankar Narayan, Edwinraj Esack, Yakov Kuzyakov, Anisa Ratnasari
{"title":"Metagenomic insights of microbial functions under conventional and conservation agriculture.","authors":"Samrendra Singh Thakur, Stefany Solano González, Prashanth Suravajhala, Subodh Kumar Jain, Shweta Yadav, Karthik Sankar Narayan, Edwinraj Esack, Yakov Kuzyakov, Anisa Ratnasari","doi":"10.1007/s11274-025-04312-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Agricultural practices such as conventional (CN) and conservation agriculture (CA) influence the composition and structure of soil microorganisms. We used short reads and genome-resolved metagenomic-based dual sequencing approaches to create a profile of bacterial and archaeal communities in hyperthermic Typic Haplustepts soil after seven years of CA and CN. The most differences in the physico-chemical and biological properties of soil were higher pH, organics carbon, available nitrogen and microbial biomass contents, activities of dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase, found in CA soil. The dominant bacterial taxa under both management types were Pseudomonadota (46-48%), Acidobacteriota (12-13%), Planctomycetota (8-10%), Bacteroidota (7-8%), and Actinomycetota (6-7%). Nitrososphaerota (1.1-1.5%) was the predominant archaeal phyla in CA and CN soils. The alpha diversity was 1.5 times higher in CA compared to CN soils. Fourteen high-quality (HQ) metagenomic-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered from both groups. Four HQ metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the Pseudomonadota phylum were exclusively recovered from the CA soil. The dominance of this phylum in the CA soil might be correlated with its nutrient richness, as certain classes of Pseudomonadota, such as Alpha, Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, are known to be copiotrophic. Copiotrophic organisms thrive in nutrient-rich environments, which could explain their prevalence in the CA soil. CAZyme gene analysis showed that Glycoside Hydrolases (GH) and GlycosylTransferases (GT) classes are dominant in the CA group, possibly due to higher substrate availability from the application of crop residues, which provide a rich source of complex carbohydrates. Several biogeochemical gene families related to C1 compounds, hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur metabolism were enriched in CA soils, suggesting these practices may contribute to a soil environment with increased organic matter content, microbial diversity, and nutrient availability. Overall, CA practices seemed to improve soil health by supporting soil microbial communities abundance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23703,"journal":{"name":"World journal of microbiology & biotechnology","volume":"41 3","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of microbiology & biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-025-04312-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural practices such as conventional (CN) and conservation agriculture (CA) influence the composition and structure of soil microorganisms. We used short reads and genome-resolved metagenomic-based dual sequencing approaches to create a profile of bacterial and archaeal communities in hyperthermic Typic Haplustepts soil after seven years of CA and CN. The most differences in the physico-chemical and biological properties of soil were higher pH, organics carbon, available nitrogen and microbial biomass contents, activities of dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, and arylsulfatase, found in CA soil. The dominant bacterial taxa under both management types were Pseudomonadota (46-48%), Acidobacteriota (12-13%), Planctomycetota (8-10%), Bacteroidota (7-8%), and Actinomycetota (6-7%). Nitrososphaerota (1.1-1.5%) was the predominant archaeal phyla in CA and CN soils. The alpha diversity was 1.5 times higher in CA compared to CN soils. Fourteen high-quality (HQ) metagenomic-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered from both groups. Four HQ metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from the Pseudomonadota phylum were exclusively recovered from the CA soil. The dominance of this phylum in the CA soil might be correlated with its nutrient richness, as certain classes of Pseudomonadota, such as Alpha, Beta-, Gamma-, and Deltaproteobacteria, are known to be copiotrophic. Copiotrophic organisms thrive in nutrient-rich environments, which could explain their prevalence in the CA soil. CAZyme gene analysis showed that Glycoside Hydrolases (GH) and GlycosylTransferases (GT) classes are dominant in the CA group, possibly due to higher substrate availability from the application of crop residues, which provide a rich source of complex carbohydrates. Several biogeochemical gene families related to C1 compounds, hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur metabolism were enriched in CA soils, suggesting these practices may contribute to a soil environment with increased organic matter content, microbial diversity, and nutrient availability. Overall, CA practices seemed to improve soil health by supporting soil microbial communities abundance.

传统农业和保护性农业微生物功能的宏基因组研究。
传统农业(CN)和保护性农业(CA)等农业实践影响土壤微生物的组成和结构。我们使用短读和基于基因组解析的宏基因组双测序方法,在经过7年的CA和CN后,在高温的典型haplusteps土壤中创建了细菌和古细菌群落的概况。土壤理化和生物学性状差异最大的是CA土壤的pH值、有机碳、速效氮和微生物量、脱氢酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶和芳基硫酸盐酶活性。两种管理方式下的优势菌群分别为假单胞菌门(46-48%)、酸杆菌门(12-13%)、植菌门(8-10%)、拟杆菌门(7-8%)和放线菌门(6-7%)。亚硝基藻门(1.1 ~ 1.5%)是CA和CN土壤中占优势的古菌门。CA土壤的α多样性是CN土壤的1.5倍。两组共获得14个高质量宏基因组组装基因组(HQ)。从CA土壤中获得假单胞菌门的4个HQ宏基因组组装基因组(MAGs)。这一门在CA土壤中的优势可能与其营养丰富程度有关,因为某些类别的假单胞菌,如α、β -、γ -和德尔塔变形菌,已知是共同营养的。共生生物在营养丰富的环境中茁壮成长,这可以解释它们在CA土壤中的普遍存在。CAZyme基因分析表明,糖苷水解酶(Glycoside hydrolase, GH)和糖基转移酶(GlycosylTransferases, GT)类在CA组中占主导地位,这可能是由于作物秸秆对底物的可利用性较高,提供了丰富的复合碳水化合物来源。与C1化合物、氢、氧和硫代谢相关的几个生物地球化学基因家族在CA土壤中富集,表明这些做法可能有助于增加有机质含量、微生物多样性和养分有效性的土壤环境。总体而言,CA实践似乎通过支持土壤微生物群落丰富度来改善土壤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World journal of microbiology & biotechnology
World journal of microbiology & biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology publishes research papers and review articles on all aspects of Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. Since its foundation, the Journal has provided a forum for research work directed toward finding microbiological and biotechnological solutions to global problems. As many of these problems, including crop productivity, public health and waste management, have major impacts in the developing world, the Journal especially reports on advances for and from developing regions. Some topics are not within the scope of the Journal. Please do not submit your manuscript if it falls into one of the following categories: · Virology · Simple isolation of microbes from local sources · Simple descriptions of an environment or reports on a procedure · Veterinary, agricultural and clinical topics in which the main focus is not on a microorganism · Data reporting on host response to microbes · Optimization of a procedure · Description of the biological effects of not fully identified compounds or undefined extracts of natural origin · Data on not fully purified enzymes or procedures in which they are applied All articles published in the Journal are independently refereed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信