Clinical Comparison of COVID Waves 2-5. An Inpatient Retrospective Comparative Analysis From Karachi, Pakistan.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf072
Muneeba Ahsan Sayeed, Elisha Shalim, Shaiza Farman, Fizza Farooqui, Beenish Syed, Ishfaque Ahmed, Anika Iqbal, Aneel Kumar, Raniyah Akhter, Furkan Hyder, Hasan Ali Shah, Adeel Hussain, Sarwat Rasheed, Saba Afshan, Rizwana Salik Nukrich, Madiha Raza, Haseeb U Rehman, Abdul Razzaque Memon, Abdul Wahid Rajput, Muhammad Saeed Quraishy
{"title":"Clinical Comparison of COVID Waves 2-5. An Inpatient Retrospective Comparative Analysis From Karachi, Pakistan.","authors":"Muneeba Ahsan Sayeed, Elisha Shalim, Shaiza Farman, Fizza Farooqui, Beenish Syed, Ishfaque Ahmed, Anika Iqbal, Aneel Kumar, Raniyah Akhter, Furkan Hyder, Hasan Ali Shah, Adeel Hussain, Sarwat Rasheed, Saba Afshan, Rizwana Salik Nukrich, Madiha Raza, Haseeb U Rehman, Abdul Razzaque Memon, Abdul Wahid Rajput, Muhammad Saeed Quraishy","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Each coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave is unique in its clinical presentation and outcome. In this study, we compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID waves 2-5 in inpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at the Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital and Research Center on adult patients who were admitted with a positive COVID polymerase chain reaction from July 2020 to March 2022. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3190 COVID-19 patients were admitted. Wave 2 had the highest percentage of discharges compared with mortality (81%; <i>P</i> = .0001). Cytokine release syndrome was most common in wave 3 (32.7%; <i>P</i> = .0001). Severe COVID on admission was predominant in wave 4 (79.4%; <i>P</i> = .0001), with the highest rates of intubation (27.1%; <i>P</i> = .0001), septic shock (24.3%; <i>P</i> = .0001), and disease progression (50.8%; <i>P</i> = .0001). In wave 5, the majority were elderly (median age, 68 years) and had mild COVID (22.4%; <i>P</i> = .0001), most had comorbidities (84.6%; <i>P</i> = .0001), and the ratio of acute kidney injury was high (29.2%; <i>P</i> = .0001). Mortality was lowest in wave 2 (18.9%; <i>P</i> = .0001) and highest in wave 4 (42.5%; <i>P</i> = .0001; odds ratio, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.6-3.8; compared with wave 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Each wave had some unique characteristics compared with other waves, with wave 4, driven by the Delta variant, being the deadliest one in terms of disease severity and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 3","pages":"ofaf072"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890920/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Each coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) wave is unique in its clinical presentation and outcome. In this study, we compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID waves 2-5 in inpatient settings.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Sindh Infectious Diseases Hospital and Research Center on adult patients who were admitted with a positive COVID polymerase chain reaction from July 2020 to March 2022. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data.

Results: A total of 3190 COVID-19 patients were admitted. Wave 2 had the highest percentage of discharges compared with mortality (81%; P = .0001). Cytokine release syndrome was most common in wave 3 (32.7%; P = .0001). Severe COVID on admission was predominant in wave 4 (79.4%; P = .0001), with the highest rates of intubation (27.1%; P = .0001), septic shock (24.3%; P = .0001), and disease progression (50.8%; P = .0001). In wave 5, the majority were elderly (median age, 68 years) and had mild COVID (22.4%; P = .0001), most had comorbidities (84.6%; P = .0001), and the ratio of acute kidney injury was high (29.2%; P = .0001). Mortality was lowest in wave 2 (18.9%; P = .0001) and highest in wave 4 (42.5%; P = .0001; odds ratio, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.6-3.8; compared with wave 2).

Conclusions: Each wave had some unique characteristics compared with other waves, with wave 4, driven by the Delta variant, being the deadliest one in terms of disease severity and outcomes.

2-5波新冠肺炎临床比较巴基斯坦卡拉奇住院病人回顾性比较分析。
背景:每一波2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在临床表现和结局上都是独特的。在这项研究中,我们比较了住院环境中2-5波COVID的临床特征和结局。方法:对信德省传染病医院和研究中心2020年7月至2022年3月收治的COVID聚合酶链反应阳性的成年患者进行回顾性研究。采用SPSS 26软件对数据进行分析。结果:共收治新冠肺炎患者3190例。与死亡率相比,第2波的出院率最高(81%;P = 0.0001)。细胞因子释放综合征在第3波最常见(32.7%;P = 0.0001)。第4波以入院时重症为主(79.4%;P = 0.0001),插管率最高(27.1%;P = 0.0001),感染性休克(24.3%;P = 0.0001),疾病进展(50.8%;P = 0.0001)。在第5波中,大多数是老年人(中位年龄为68岁),轻度COVID (22.4%;P = 0.0001),大多数患者有合并症(84.6%;P = 0.0001),急性肾损伤发生率高(29.2%;P = 0.0001)。第二波死亡率最低(18.9%;P = 0.0001),第4波最高(42.5%;P = 0.0001;优势比,3.18;95% ci, 2.6-3.8;结论:与其他波相比,每一波都有一些独特的特征,其中由Delta变异驱动的第4波在疾病严重程度和结局方面是最致命的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信