The efficacy and safety of zavegepant nasal inhalation versus oral calcitonin-gene related peptide receptor antagonists in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zixiang Zhu, Yanbing Tang, Longyuan Li, Hanyu Ni, Meirong Liu, Zhouqing Chen, Zhong Wang
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of zavegepant nasal inhalation versus oral calcitonin-gene related peptide receptor antagonists in the acute treatment of migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.","authors":"Zixiang Zhu, Yanbing Tang, Longyuan Li, Hanyu Ni, Meirong Liu, Zhouqing Chen, Zhong Wang","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-01984-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The latest randomized controlled trial (RCT) revealed that zavegepant, a new nasal inhalation calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, has a clear efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, whether the efficacy of this new nasal inhalation drug is better than other oral CGRP receptor antagonists remained to be confirmed. Therefore, we designed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide a reference for the clinical application of zavegepant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 1, 2024. RCTs using CGRP receptor antagonists (excluding non-randomized, non-English or no extractable data trials) to treat adult patients suffering from acute migraine were included. STATA 18.0 and R STUDIO were used for the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 randomized clinical trials with 11,179 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, zavegepant 10 mg demonstrated a significantly higher efficiency for pain freedom at 2 h (relative risk (RR) = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.28-1.82, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, P < 0.001) and most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom at 2 h (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13-1.42, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, P < 0.001), but did not show significant superiority over oral CGRP receptor antagonists. In terms of safety, zavegepant 10 mg was significantly inferior to placebo but not inferior to oral CGRP receptor antagonists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Zavegepant 10 mg can quickly relieve symptoms and has no significant difference in safety compared with oral drugs, which can provide rapid and safe efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, compared with other oral CGRP receptor antagonists, zavegepant 10 mg by nasal inhalation has no obvious advantage in long-term symptom relief rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-01984-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The latest randomized controlled trial (RCT) revealed that zavegepant, a new nasal inhalation calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, has a clear efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, whether the efficacy of this new nasal inhalation drug is better than other oral CGRP receptor antagonists remained to be confirmed. Therefore, we designed this network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide a reference for the clinical application of zavegepant.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science up to December 1, 2024. RCTs using CGRP receptor antagonists (excluding non-randomized, non-English or no extractable data trials) to treat adult patients suffering from acute migraine were included. STATA 18.0 and R STUDIO were used for the statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 15 randomized clinical trials with 11,179 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, zavegepant 10 mg demonstrated a significantly higher efficiency for pain freedom at 2 h (relative risk (RR) = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.28-1.82, I2 = 0.0%, P < 0.001) and most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom at 2 h (RR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.13-1.42, I2 = 0.0%, P < 0.001), but did not show significant superiority over oral CGRP receptor antagonists. In terms of safety, zavegepant 10 mg was significantly inferior to placebo but not inferior to oral CGRP receptor antagonists.

Conclusion: Zavegepant 10 mg can quickly relieve symptoms and has no significant difference in safety compared with oral drugs, which can provide rapid and safe efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. However, compared with other oral CGRP receptor antagonists, zavegepant 10 mg by nasal inhalation has no obvious advantage in long-term symptom relief rate.

zavegegent鼻吸入与口服降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂急性治疗偏头痛的疗效和安全性:文献的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:最新的随机对照试验(RCT)显示,一种新型鼻腔吸入降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)受体拮抗剂zavegegant对偏头痛的急性治疗有明确的疗效。然而,这种新型鼻吸入药物的疗效是否优于其他口服CGRP受体拮抗剂还有待证实。因此,我们设计了网络荟萃分析(NMA),为zavegepant的临床应用提供参考。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials、Scopus和Web of Science,检索时间截止到2024年12月1日。使用CGRP受体拮抗剂治疗急性偏头痛成年患者的随机对照试验(不包括非随机、非英文或无可提取数据的试验)被纳入。统计学分析采用STATA 18.0和R STUDIO。结果:共纳入15项随机临床试验,11,179例患者。与安慰剂相比,zavegepant 10 mg在2 h时的镇痛效果显著提高(相对危险度(RR) = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.28-1.82, I2 = 0.0%, p2 = 0.0%, P)结论:zavegepant 10 mg可快速缓解症状,安全性与口服药物无显著差异,可为偏头痛急性治疗提供快速、安全的疗效。然而,与其他口服CGRP受体拮抗剂相比,经鼻吸入zavegegent 10mg在长期症状缓解率上没有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信