Effect of Simulated Tooth Brushing on Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color Stability of Milled and Printed Permanent Restorative Materials.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Omar O Bataweel, Jean-Francios Roulet, Mateus G Rocha, Panagiotis Zoidis, Patricia Pereira, Alex J Delgado
{"title":"Effect of Simulated Tooth Brushing on Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color Stability of Milled and Printed Permanent Restorative Materials.","authors":"Omar O Bataweel, Jean-Francios Roulet, Mateus G Rocha, Panagiotis Zoidis, Patricia Pereira, Alex J Delgado","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This in vitro study evaluated the effects of simulated toothbrushing on surface roughness, gloss, and color stability of milled and printed resin-based and lithium disilicate materials for permanent dental restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five materials were tested, including CAD/CAM prepolymerized resin blocks, a ceramic material, a resin composite and a newly FDA-cleared 3D-printed resin for permanent crowns. Specimens underwent a controlled brushing protocol simulating 5 years of brushing (50,000 cycles). Surface roughness (R<sub>a</sub>), gloss (GU), and color stability (ΔE) were measured at baseline and after 10,000, 30,000, and 50,000 cycles using an optical profilometer, glossmeter, and spectrophotometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed surface morphology post-brushing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ceramic materials exhibited superior resistance to surface roughness and gloss loss, maintaining high esthetic properties (p < 0.001). In contrast, 3D-printed resin materials showed notable increases in surface roughness and gloss reduction, reflecting a higher susceptibility to wear. Resin composites demonstrated variable performance, with direct-use composites performing worse than their CAD/CAM milled counterparts. Glossed ceramic materials exhibited clinically acceptable color changes, while all other groups exceeded thresholds, posing potential esthetic challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Milled materials, particularly ceramics, demonstrated superior durability and esthetic retention. Optimization is needed for 3D-printed resin materials to enhance their mechanical and esthetic properties for long-term use. These findings guide material selection for durable, esthetic dental restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13450","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This in vitro study evaluated the effects of simulated toothbrushing on surface roughness, gloss, and color stability of milled and printed resin-based and lithium disilicate materials for permanent dental restorations.

Materials and methods: Five materials were tested, including CAD/CAM prepolymerized resin blocks, a ceramic material, a resin composite and a newly FDA-cleared 3D-printed resin for permanent crowns. Specimens underwent a controlled brushing protocol simulating 5 years of brushing (50,000 cycles). Surface roughness (Ra), gloss (GU), and color stability (ΔE) were measured at baseline and after 10,000, 30,000, and 50,000 cycles using an optical profilometer, glossmeter, and spectrophotometer. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyzed surface morphology post-brushing.

Results: Ceramic materials exhibited superior resistance to surface roughness and gloss loss, maintaining high esthetic properties (p < 0.001). In contrast, 3D-printed resin materials showed notable increases in surface roughness and gloss reduction, reflecting a higher susceptibility to wear. Resin composites demonstrated variable performance, with direct-use composites performing worse than their CAD/CAM milled counterparts. Glossed ceramic materials exhibited clinically acceptable color changes, while all other groups exceeded thresholds, posing potential esthetic challenges.

Conclusions: Milled materials, particularly ceramics, demonstrated superior durability and esthetic retention. Optimization is needed for 3D-printed resin materials to enhance their mechanical and esthetic properties for long-term use. These findings guide material selection for durable, esthetic dental restorations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信