Racial Differences in Colorectal Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in the United States.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yuqi Wu, Piet C de Groen, Nabil Natafgi, Chao Cai, Dezhi Wu, Sudha Xirasagar
{"title":"Racial Differences in Colorectal Adenomas at Screening Colonoscopy in the United States.","authors":"Yuqi Wu, Piet C de Groen, Nabil Natafgi, Chao Cai, Dezhi Wu, Sudha Xirasagar","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Black Americans experience a higher incidence of colorectal cancer than Whites despite undergoing prevention screenings similar to those of Whites since 2010. We compared the colorectal adenoma status of Black and White patients at screening colonoscopy, a measure of colorectal cancer risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using cross-sectional, observational data, we studied colorectal adenomas at first-time screening colonoscopy in average-risk patients aged 40 to 89 years, screened between September 2001 and July 2016 in South Carolina. We analyzed the age-adjusted odds of Black men and women (vs. White) having adenomas, advanced adenomas, ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas, and right hyperplastic polyps, and compared their total polyp burden (the sum of the diameters of all adenomas and right polyps detected).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 28,100 patients (58.4% Black and 53.8% women), we found that Black patients had lower age- and gender-adjusted odds than White patients of having adenoma (OR = 0.88, P < 0.01) and right hyperplastic polyp (OR = 0.74, P < 0.01), with a similar pattern within gender groups. Black and White patients were similar about advanced adenoma and 3+ nonadvanced adenoma. Among patients with lesions, mean polyp burden ranged from 8.5 mm (±7.2) for Black women aged 40 to 49 years to 12.3 mm (±7.4) for Black men aged more than 70 years. Age-adjusted polyp burden was 0.4 mm higher for Black men than for White men and 0.3 mm lower for Black women than for White women patient groups (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large, racially balanced patient sample, Black and White patients showed similar polyp profiles.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Given similar adenoma status, other evidence-supported clinical factors associated with suboptimal polyp detection should be explored to understand the continuing colorectal cancer disparities affecting Black Americans.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"698-704"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Black Americans experience a higher incidence of colorectal cancer than Whites despite undergoing prevention screenings similar to those of Whites since 2010. We compared the colorectal adenoma status of Black and White patients at screening colonoscopy, a measure of colorectal cancer risk.

Methods: Using cross-sectional, observational data, we studied colorectal adenomas at first-time screening colonoscopy in average-risk patients aged 40 to 89 years, screened between September 2001 and July 2016 in South Carolina. We analyzed the age-adjusted odds of Black men and women (vs. White) having adenomas, advanced adenomas, ≥3 nonadvanced adenomas, and right hyperplastic polyps, and compared their total polyp burden (the sum of the diameters of all adenomas and right polyps detected).

Results: Among 28,100 patients (58.4% Black and 53.8% women), we found that Black patients had lower age- and gender-adjusted odds than White patients of having adenoma (OR = 0.88, P < 0.01) and right hyperplastic polyp (OR = 0.74, P < 0.01), with a similar pattern within gender groups. Black and White patients were similar about advanced adenoma and 3+ nonadvanced adenoma. Among patients with lesions, mean polyp burden ranged from 8.5 mm (±7.2) for Black women aged 40 to 49 years to 12.3 mm (±7.4) for Black men aged more than 70 years. Age-adjusted polyp burden was 0.4 mm higher for Black men than for White men and 0.3 mm lower for Black women than for White women patient groups (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: In a large, racially balanced patient sample, Black and White patients showed similar polyp profiles.

Impact: Given similar adenoma status, other evidence-supported clinical factors associated with suboptimal polyp detection should be explored to understand the continuing colorectal cancer disparities affecting Black Americans.

美国结肠镜筛查中结肠直肠腺瘤的种族差异。
背景:尽管自2010年以来进行了与白人相似的预防筛查,但美国黑人的结直肠癌(CRC)发病率高于白人。我们比较了黑人和白人患者在结肠镜筛查时的结直肠腺瘤状态,这是衡量结直肠癌风险的一项指标。方法:采用横断面观察性数据,研究了2001年9月至2016年7月在南卡罗来纳州筛查的40-89岁平均风险患者首次结肠镜筛查时的结直肠腺瘤。我们研究了黑人男性和女性(相对于白人)患腺瘤、晚期腺瘤、≥3个非晚期腺瘤和右侧增生性息肉的年龄调整后的几率,并比较了他们的总息肉负担(所有腺瘤和右侧息肉的直径总和)。结果:在28,100例患者中,58.4%的黑人和53.8%的女性,我们发现黑人患者患腺瘤的年龄和性别调整后的几率低于白人(OR=0.88, p)。在一个大的,种族平衡的患者样本中,黑人和白人患者表现出相似的息肉特征。影响:鉴于类似的腺瘤状态,应该探索其他有证据支持的与次优息肉检测相关的临床因素,以了解影响黑人美国人的持续CRC差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信