Katherine Taylor, Elizabeth Robinson, Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stuart A Taylor, Damian Tolan, Anita Wale, Ian Zealley, Kieran G Foley
{"title":"A British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology multi-centre audit of imaging investigations in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Katherine Taylor, Elizabeth Robinson, Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stuart A Taylor, Damian Tolan, Anita Wale, Ian Zealley, Kieran G Foley","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate current UK practice for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imaging against recommendations from published international literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multi-centre audit was undertaken evaluating imaging modalities, protocols, and pathways used to investigate IBD both in outpatient and inpatient settings during January-December 2022. Reporting practices and training provisions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one centres contributed: 35 centres provided complete data, whereas 6 centres provided incomplete data. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) was the most common modality for small bowel imaging across UK centres, comprising 13 099/18 784 (69.7%) investigations. There was regional variability in other modalities used, with 5 centres performing 81% of all intestinal ultrasound and 3 centres performing 65% of all small bowel follow-through. Compared with outpatients, inpatients with suspected IBD were significantly more likely to be imaged with techniques imparting ionising radiation whether scanned either in-hours (p = 0.005) or out-of-hours (p < 0.001). Non-ionising radiation imaging modalities were significantly less available out-of-hours (p < 0.0001). Sequences included in MRE protocols were variable. Disparity in imaging follow-up for patients prescribed biologic therapies was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable variation in UK IBD imaging practice has been identified. Improvements must be made to reduce the regional inequality of patient access to different imaging modalities and decrease reliance on ionising radiation for inpatients. Further research to standardise and optimise imaging pathways should be undertaken to improve uniformity, with emphasis placed on training and education.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This multi-centre audit showed considerable IBD imaging practice variation between UK centres, particularly for imaging modalities used between inpatient and outpatient groups and in-hours versus out-of-hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"734-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate current UK practice for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imaging against recommendations from published international literature.
Methods: A retrospective multi-centre audit was undertaken evaluating imaging modalities, protocols, and pathways used to investigate IBD both in outpatient and inpatient settings during January-December 2022. Reporting practices and training provisions were also recorded.
Results: Forty-one centres contributed: 35 centres provided complete data, whereas 6 centres provided incomplete data. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) was the most common modality for small bowel imaging across UK centres, comprising 13 099/18 784 (69.7%) investigations. There was regional variability in other modalities used, with 5 centres performing 81% of all intestinal ultrasound and 3 centres performing 65% of all small bowel follow-through. Compared with outpatients, inpatients with suspected IBD were significantly more likely to be imaged with techniques imparting ionising radiation whether scanned either in-hours (p = 0.005) or out-of-hours (p < 0.001). Non-ionising radiation imaging modalities were significantly less available out-of-hours (p < 0.0001). Sequences included in MRE protocols were variable. Disparity in imaging follow-up for patients prescribed biologic therapies was observed.
Conclusions: Considerable variation in UK IBD imaging practice has been identified. Improvements must be made to reduce the regional inequality of patient access to different imaging modalities and decrease reliance on ionising radiation for inpatients. Further research to standardise and optimise imaging pathways should be undertaken to improve uniformity, with emphasis placed on training and education.
Advances in knowledge: This multi-centre audit showed considerable IBD imaging practice variation between UK centres, particularly for imaging modalities used between inpatient and outpatient groups and in-hours versus out-of-hours.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option