A British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology multi-centre audit of imaging investigations in inflammatory bowel disease.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Katherine Taylor, Elizabeth Robinson, Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stuart A Taylor, Damian Tolan, Anita Wale, Ian Zealley, Kieran G Foley
{"title":"A British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology multi-centre audit of imaging investigations in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Katherine Taylor, Elizabeth Robinson, Ravivarma Balasubramaniam, Gauraang Bhatnagar, Stuart A Taylor, Damian Tolan, Anita Wale, Ian Zealley, Kieran G Foley","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate current UK practice for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imaging against recommendations from published international literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multi-centre audit was undertaken evaluating imaging modalities, protocols, and pathways used to investigate IBD both in outpatient and inpatient settings during January-December 2022. Reporting practices and training provisions were also recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one centres contributed: 35 centres provided complete data, whereas 6 centres provided incomplete data. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) was the most common modality for small bowel imaging across UK centres, comprising 13 099/18 784 (69.7%) investigations. There was regional variability in other modalities used, with 5 centres performing 81% of all intestinal ultrasound and 3 centres performing 65% of all small bowel follow-through. Compared with outpatients, inpatients with suspected IBD were significantly more likely to be imaged with techniques imparting ionising radiation whether scanned either in-hours (p = 0.005) or out-of-hours (p < 0.001). Non-ionising radiation imaging modalities were significantly less available out-of-hours (p < 0.0001). Sequences included in MRE protocols were variable. Disparity in imaging follow-up for patients prescribed biologic therapies was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considerable variation in UK IBD imaging practice has been identified. Improvements must be made to reduce the regional inequality of patient access to different imaging modalities and decrease reliance on ionising radiation for inpatients. Further research to standardise and optimise imaging pathways should be undertaken to improve uniformity, with emphasis placed on training and education.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>This multi-centre audit showed considerable IBD imaging practice variation between UK centres, particularly for imaging modalities used between inpatient and outpatient groups and in-hours versus out-of-hours.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"734-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12012338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate current UK practice for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) imaging against recommendations from published international literature.

Methods: A retrospective multi-centre audit was undertaken evaluating imaging modalities, protocols, and pathways used to investigate IBD both in outpatient and inpatient settings during January-December 2022. Reporting practices and training provisions were also recorded.

Results: Forty-one centres contributed: 35 centres provided complete data, whereas 6 centres provided incomplete data. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) was the most common modality for small bowel imaging across UK centres, comprising 13 099/18 784 (69.7%) investigations. There was regional variability in other modalities used, with 5 centres performing 81% of all intestinal ultrasound and 3 centres performing 65% of all small bowel follow-through. Compared with outpatients, inpatients with suspected IBD were significantly more likely to be imaged with techniques imparting ionising radiation whether scanned either in-hours (p = 0.005) or out-of-hours (p < 0.001). Non-ionising radiation imaging modalities were significantly less available out-of-hours (p < 0.0001). Sequences included in MRE protocols were variable. Disparity in imaging follow-up for patients prescribed biologic therapies was observed.

Conclusions: Considerable variation in UK IBD imaging practice has been identified. Improvements must be made to reduce the regional inequality of patient access to different imaging modalities and decrease reliance on ionising radiation for inpatients. Further research to standardise and optimise imaging pathways should be undertaken to improve uniformity, with emphasis placed on training and education.

Advances in knowledge: This multi-centre audit showed considerable IBD imaging practice variation between UK centres, particularly for imaging modalities used between inpatient and outpatient groups and in-hours versus out-of-hours.

英国胃肠和腹部放射学会(BSGAR)对炎症性肠病影像学调查的多中心审计。
目的:对比国际上发表的文献,评估目前英国对炎症性肠病(IBD)影像学检查的做法。方法:在2022年1月至12月期间,对门诊和住院IBD的成像方式、方案和路径进行了回顾性多中心审计。还记录了报告做法和培训规定。结果:41个中心提供了数据,35个中心提供了完整的数据,6个中心提供了不完整的数据。磁共振肠造影(MRE)是英国各中心最常见的小肠成像方式,包括13099 / 18784例(69.7%)的调查。使用的其他方式存在区域差异,5个中心执行81%的肠道超声检查,3个中心执行65%的小肠随访检查。与门诊患者相比,疑似IBD的住院患者更有可能接受电离辐射技术的成像,无论是在小时内(p = 0.005)还是在小时外(p)进行扫描。结论:英国IBD成像实践存在相当大的差异。必须做出改进,以减少患者获得不同成像方式的区域不平等,并减少住院患者对电离辐射的依赖。应进一步研究成像途径的标准化和优化,以提高统一性,重点放在培训和教育上。知识的进步:这次多中心审计显示,英国各中心之间IBD成像实践存在相当大的差异,特别是住院和门诊组之间使用的成像方式,以及小时内与小时外的成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信