Functional location of the language cortical areas in focal refractory epilepsy using the conventional, selective, and supraselective Wada test

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Carlos A. González-Acosta , Carlos R. Tolosa-Gaviria , Alejandro Herrera-Trujillo , Carlos A. Dorado-Ramírez , William Escobar-Rojas , Christian A. Rojas-Cerón , Lina V. Becerra-Hernández , Efraín Buriticá-Ramírez , Alfredo Pedroza-Campo
{"title":"Functional location of the language cortical areas in focal refractory epilepsy using the conventional, selective, and supraselective Wada test","authors":"Carlos A. González-Acosta ,&nbsp;Carlos R. Tolosa-Gaviria ,&nbsp;Alejandro Herrera-Trujillo ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Dorado-Ramírez ,&nbsp;William Escobar-Rojas ,&nbsp;Christian A. Rojas-Cerón ,&nbsp;Lina V. Becerra-Hernández ,&nbsp;Efraín Buriticá-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Alfredo Pedroza-Campo","doi":"10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In refractory focal epilepsy, resective surgery offers an alternative for seizure control. However, there is a risk of language deterioration when the epileptogenic zone involves an eloquent cortical region. The Wada test involves the insertion of a catheter through the internal carotid artery and the injection of a short-acting anesthetic, resulting in transient loss of hemisphere function. While its specificity is high, its sensitivity is reduced, despite its limited or absent spatial resolution. Additionally, the generalized action of the anesthetic may lead to misinterpretations due to global cognitive arrest, particularly in patients with baseline deficits. The aim of this report was to prove the refinement of the selective and supraselective protocols, as well as their contribution to overcoming these disadvantages. The procedure began by placing a microcatheter in progressively more distal irrigation sites, according to the required technique, gradually performing angiography with contrast medium. Tissue perfusion allowed the identification of the cerebral parenchyma where the anesthetic would act. After injection, the assessment of neurocognitive changes was conducted. The characterization of language patterns was performed, delineating indispensable eloquent zones and dispensable eloquent zones, irrespective of the patients’ cognitive condition. There was concordance between the findings and post-surgical results. The selective and supraselective Wada test surpasses the disadvantages of the conventional method and proves decisive in surgical planning and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9083,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research","volume":"1854 ","pages":"Article 149564"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899325001222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In refractory focal epilepsy, resective surgery offers an alternative for seizure control. However, there is a risk of language deterioration when the epileptogenic zone involves an eloquent cortical region. The Wada test involves the insertion of a catheter through the internal carotid artery and the injection of a short-acting anesthetic, resulting in transient loss of hemisphere function. While its specificity is high, its sensitivity is reduced, despite its limited or absent spatial resolution. Additionally, the generalized action of the anesthetic may lead to misinterpretations due to global cognitive arrest, particularly in patients with baseline deficits. The aim of this report was to prove the refinement of the selective and supraselective protocols, as well as their contribution to overcoming these disadvantages. The procedure began by placing a microcatheter in progressively more distal irrigation sites, according to the required technique, gradually performing angiography with contrast medium. Tissue perfusion allowed the identification of the cerebral parenchyma where the anesthetic would act. After injection, the assessment of neurocognitive changes was conducted. The characterization of language patterns was performed, delineating indispensable eloquent zones and dispensable eloquent zones, irrespective of the patients’ cognitive condition. There was concordance between the findings and post-surgical results. The selective and supraselective Wada test surpasses the disadvantages of the conventional method and proves decisive in surgical planning and decision-making.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Research
Brain Research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
268
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: An international multidisciplinary journal devoted to fundamental research in the brain sciences. Brain Research publishes papers reporting interdisciplinary investigations of nervous system structure and function that are of general interest to the international community of neuroscientists. As is evident from the journals name, its scope is broad, ranging from cellular and molecular studies through systems neuroscience, cognition and disease. Invited reviews are also published; suggestions for and inquiries about potential reviews are welcomed. With the appearance of the final issue of the 2011 subscription, Vol. 67/1-2 (24 June 2011), Brain Research Reviews has ceased publication as a distinct journal separate from Brain Research. Review articles accepted for Brain Research are now published in that journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信