Group arts interventions for depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Elizabeth A. Quinn, Emma Millard, Janelle M. Jones
{"title":"Group arts interventions for depression and anxiety among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Elizabeth A. Quinn, Emma Millard, Janelle M. Jones","doi":"10.1038/s44220-024-00368-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of group arts interventions, where individuals engage together in a shared artistic experience (for example, dance or painting), for reducing depression and anxiety among older adults (> 55 yr without dementia). Fifty controlled studies were identified via electronic databases searched to February 2024 (randomised: 42, non-randomised: 8). Thirty-nine studies were included. Thirty-six studies investigated the impact of group arts interventions on depression (n = 3,360) and ten studies investigated anxiety (n = 949). Subgroup analyses assessed whether participant, contextual, intervention and study characteristics moderated the intervention–outcome relationship. Risk of bias was assessed with appropriate tools (RoB-2, ROBINS-1). Group arts interventions were associated with a moderate reduction in depression (Cohen’s d = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54–0.87, P < 0.001) and a moderate reduction in anxiety (d = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.37–1.52, P < 0.001), although there was publication bias in the depression studies. After a trim and fill adjustment, the effect for depression remained (d = 0.42; CI = 0.35–0.50; P < 0.001). Context moderated this effect: There was a greater reduction in depression when group arts interventions were delivered in care homes (d = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.72–1.42, P < 0.001) relative to the community (d = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32–0.70, P < 0.001). Findings indicate that group arts are an effective intervention for addressing depression and anxiety among older adults. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of group arts interventions for older adults, the authors found that participation in shared artistic experience was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety.","PeriodicalId":74247,"journal":{"name":"Nature mental health","volume":"3 3","pages":"374-386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00368-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44220-024-00368-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the efficacy of group arts interventions, where individuals engage together in a shared artistic experience (for example, dance or painting), for reducing depression and anxiety among older adults (> 55 yr without dementia). Fifty controlled studies were identified via electronic databases searched to February 2024 (randomised: 42, non-randomised: 8). Thirty-nine studies were included. Thirty-six studies investigated the impact of group arts interventions on depression (n = 3,360) and ten studies investigated anxiety (n = 949). Subgroup analyses assessed whether participant, contextual, intervention and study characteristics moderated the intervention–outcome relationship. Risk of bias was assessed with appropriate tools (RoB-2, ROBINS-1). Group arts interventions were associated with a moderate reduction in depression (Cohen’s d = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54–0.87, P < 0.001) and a moderate reduction in anxiety (d = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.37–1.52, P < 0.001), although there was publication bias in the depression studies. After a trim and fill adjustment, the effect for depression remained (d = 0.42; CI = 0.35–0.50; P < 0.001). Context moderated this effect: There was a greater reduction in depression when group arts interventions were delivered in care homes (d = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.72–1.42, P < 0.001) relative to the community (d = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32–0.70, P < 0.001). Findings indicate that group arts are an effective intervention for addressing depression and anxiety among older adults. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of group arts interventions for older adults, the authors found that participation in shared artistic experience was associated with lower levels of depression and anxiety.

Abstract Image

团体艺术干预对老年人抑郁和焦虑的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
在这一系统回顾和荟萃分析中,我们评估了集体艺术干预的效果,在集体艺术干预中,个体一起参与共享的艺术体验(例如,舞蹈或绘画),以减少老年人(55岁无痴呆)的抑郁和焦虑。通过检索到2024年2月的电子数据库确定了50项对照研究(随机:42项,非随机:8项),其中包括39项研究。36项研究调查了团体艺术干预对抑郁症的影响(n = 3360), 10项研究调查了焦虑(n = 949)。亚组分析评估了受试者、环境、干预和研究特征是否调节了干预-结果的关系。采用适当的工具(rob2、ROBINS-1)评估偏倚风险。团体艺术干预与中度减少抑郁(Cohen’s d = 0.70, 95%可信区间(CI) = 0.54-0.87, P < 0.001)和中度减少焦虑(d = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.37-1.52, P < 0.001)相关,尽管在抑郁症研究中存在发表偏倚。在修剪和填充调整后,凹陷的影响仍然存在(d = 0.42;ci = 0.35-0.50;P < 0.001)。环境调节了这种影响:与社区相比,在护理院进行团体艺术干预(d = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.72-1.42, P < 0.001),抑郁症的减少更大(d = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.32-0.70, P < 0.001)。研究结果表明,团体艺术是解决老年人抑郁和焦虑的有效干预措施。在这项针对老年人群体艺术干预的系统回顾和荟萃分析中,作者发现,参与共享艺术体验与较低水平的抑郁和焦虑有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信