Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social-Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision-Making

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Imogen Hobbs, Valentin Lucet, Jennifer M. Holzer, Julia Baird, Gordon M. Hickey
{"title":"Measuring the Degree of ‘Fit’ Within Social-Ecological Systems to Support Local Flood Risk Decision-Making","authors":"Imogen Hobbs,&nbsp;Valentin Lucet,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Holzer,&nbsp;Julia Baird,&nbsp;Gordon M. Hickey","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective social-ecological fit is considered essential for properly managing social-ecological systems. Despite this importance, the concept of social-ecological fit lacks the following: clarity in scope and definition, a practical quantitative method to assess effectiveness, and methods capable of equally assessing the social and ecological factors within the system being managed. To address these knowledge gaps, we reviewed how social-ecological fit has been conceptualised in the literature and then tested the use of Bayesian Belief networks and analysis to quantitatively assess “fit” using the case of flooding in the North Onslow saltmarsh region of Truro, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to assess which decision-making choices would most likely reduce flood risk, and therefore achieve the best ‘fit’. Drawing from a combination of existing literature and local expert opinion, we identified the relevant factors influencing flood risk in the region, their relationship to each other and their combined relationship to local flood risk. Ice jam frequency, high tide frequency and dyke maintenance were found to have the most influence. The results of this study can be used to inform local flood-risk-related decision-making in Truro and act as a model for quantitatively assessing social-ecological fit in other risk management settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective social-ecological fit is considered essential for properly managing social-ecological systems. Despite this importance, the concept of social-ecological fit lacks the following: clarity in scope and definition, a practical quantitative method to assess effectiveness, and methods capable of equally assessing the social and ecological factors within the system being managed. To address these knowledge gaps, we reviewed how social-ecological fit has been conceptualised in the literature and then tested the use of Bayesian Belief networks and analysis to quantitatively assess “fit” using the case of flooding in the North Onslow saltmarsh region of Truro, Nova Scotia. The objective of this study was to assess which decision-making choices would most likely reduce flood risk, and therefore achieve the best ‘fit’. Drawing from a combination of existing literature and local expert opinion, we identified the relevant factors influencing flood risk in the region, their relationship to each other and their combined relationship to local flood risk. Ice jam frequency, high tide frequency and dyke maintenance were found to have the most influence. The results of this study can be used to inform local flood-risk-related decision-making in Truro and act as a model for quantitatively assessing social-ecological fit in other risk management settings.

Abstract Image

衡量社会生态系统的“契合度”以支持地方洪水风险决策
有效的社会-生态契合被认为是正确管理社会-生态系统的关键。尽管如此重要,社会-生态契合度的概念却缺乏以下几点:明确的范围和定义、评估有效性的实用定量方法,以及能够平等评估被管理系统中的社会和生态因素的方法。为了解决这些知识空白,我们回顾了文献中如何对社会生态适应性进行概念化,然后以新斯科舍省特鲁罗市北昂斯洛盐沼地区的洪水为例,测试了如何使用贝叶斯信念网络和分析方法对 "适应性 "进行定量评估。这项研究的目的是评估哪些决策选择最有可能降低洪水风险,从而实现最佳 "契合度"。结合现有文献和当地专家意见,我们确定了影响该地区洪水风险的相关因素、这些因素之间的关系以及它们与当地洪水风险的综合关系。研究发现,冰塞频率、涨潮频率和堤坝维护的影响最大。这项研究的结果可用于特鲁罗当地与洪水风险相关的决策,并可作为在其他风险管理环境中定量评估社会生态适应性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信