Modelling river and floodplain evolution using physics-based and reduced-complexity approaches

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Andrew P. Nicholas
{"title":"Modelling river and floodplain evolution using physics-based and reduced-complexity approaches","authors":"Andrew P. Nicholas","doi":"10.1002/esp.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Models of river-floodplain evolution have previously been classified as adopting either <i>physics-based</i> or <i>reduced-complexity</i> approaches, with the latter presumed to afford a weaker representation of fluvial processes and dynamics. Results are presented herein that enable the first direct comparison of two such approaches within a single fluvial morphodynamic modelling framework. This is achieved using a new morphodynamic model that can be implemented using two alternative hydrodynamic solvers, while all other model components are unchanged. The two solvers are a momentum conserving (MC) Godunov-type finite volume scheme; and an inertial formulation (IF) of the shallow water equations, which neglects momentum transport. Simulations reported herein demonstrate that the two modelling approaches can produce channels characterised by very similar morphology and process rates. Moreover, both solvers exhibit consistent behaviour that illustrates the key role of lateral dynamics (driven by both bank erosion and other mechanisms of floodplain reworking) as a control river channel pattern. Overall, the IF solver is characterised by greater sensitivity to changes in model parameter values and, for some parameterisations, may promote channels with unrealistic planform morphology. Moreover, the neglect of momentum transport by the IF solver restricts its capacity to represent flow acceleration over bar tops, which has implications for its ability to simulate bar-driven braiding and low sinuosity braided anabranches. Despite this, the simpler IF solver is capable of simulating the evolution of meandering channels (and their floodplains) using coarse model grids, due to its representation of streamline curvature effects on sediment transport direction. The resulting reduction in computational cost associated with implementing the IF solver suggests that such reduced-complexity approaches may be particularly suitable for use in simulating the long-term (millennial) evolution of meandering river floodplains, perhaps more so than braided channels, which have often been the focus of reduced-complexity modelling studies in the past.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models of river-floodplain evolution have previously been classified as adopting either physics-based or reduced-complexity approaches, with the latter presumed to afford a weaker representation of fluvial processes and dynamics. Results are presented herein that enable the first direct comparison of two such approaches within a single fluvial morphodynamic modelling framework. This is achieved using a new morphodynamic model that can be implemented using two alternative hydrodynamic solvers, while all other model components are unchanged. The two solvers are a momentum conserving (MC) Godunov-type finite volume scheme; and an inertial formulation (IF) of the shallow water equations, which neglects momentum transport. Simulations reported herein demonstrate that the two modelling approaches can produce channels characterised by very similar morphology and process rates. Moreover, both solvers exhibit consistent behaviour that illustrates the key role of lateral dynamics (driven by both bank erosion and other mechanisms of floodplain reworking) as a control river channel pattern. Overall, the IF solver is characterised by greater sensitivity to changes in model parameter values and, for some parameterisations, may promote channels with unrealistic planform morphology. Moreover, the neglect of momentum transport by the IF solver restricts its capacity to represent flow acceleration over bar tops, which has implications for its ability to simulate bar-driven braiding and low sinuosity braided anabranches. Despite this, the simpler IF solver is capable of simulating the evolution of meandering channels (and their floodplains) using coarse model grids, due to its representation of streamline curvature effects on sediment transport direction. The resulting reduction in computational cost associated with implementing the IF solver suggests that such reduced-complexity approaches may be particularly suitable for use in simulating the long-term (millennial) evolution of meandering river floodplains, perhaps more so than braided channels, which have often been the focus of reduced-complexity modelling studies in the past.

Abstract Image

使用基于物理和降低复杂性的方法模拟河流和洪泛区的演变
河流河漫滩演化的模型以前被分类为采用基于物理的方法和降低复杂性的方法,后者被认为对河流过程和动力学的表征较弱。本文提出的结果使得在单一河流形态动力学建模框架内对两种这样的方法进行首次直接比较。这是通过一个新的形态动力学模型来实现的,该模型可以使用两个可选的流体动力学求解器来实现,而所有其他模型组件都保持不变。两个解都是动量守恒(MC) godunov型有限体积格式;以及忽略动量输运的浅水方程的惯性公式(IF)。本文报道的仿真表明,这两种建模方法可以产生具有非常相似的形态和过程速率的通道。此外,两个解算器表现出一致的行为,说明了横向动力学(由河岸侵蚀和洪泛区改造的其他机制驱动)作为控制河道模式的关键作用。总体而言,IF求解器的特点是对模型参数值的变化更敏感,并且对于某些参数化,可能会促进具有不切实际的平台形态的通道。此外,中频解算器忽略了动量输运,限制了其表示在棒状顶部的流动加速度的能力,这影响了其模拟棒状驱动编织和低弯曲编织分支的能力。尽管如此,更简单的IF求解器能够使用粗模型网格模拟曲流河道(及其洪泛平原)的演变,因为它代表了流线曲率对泥沙输运方向的影响。与IF求解器的实现相关的计算成本的降低表明,这种降低复杂性的方法可能特别适合用于模拟曲流泛滥平原的长期(千年)演化,可能比辫状河道更适用,辫状河道在过去经常是降低复杂性建模研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信