Differences in Radiological and Pathological Findings by ANCA-Subtype in ANCA-Positive Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tetsuro Sawata, Susumu Sakamoto, Yusuke Usui, Aika Suzuki, Hideya Kitamura, Tae Iwasawa, Shoichiro Matsushita, Yasuhiro Terasaki, Shinobu Kunugi, Kazuma Kishi, Tomoyuki Fujisawa, Takafumi Suda, Sakae Homma
{"title":"Differences in Radiological and Pathological Findings by ANCA-Subtype in ANCA-Positive Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias","authors":"Tetsuro Sawata,&nbsp;Susumu Sakamoto,&nbsp;Yusuke Usui,&nbsp;Aika Suzuki,&nbsp;Hideya Kitamura,&nbsp;Tae Iwasawa,&nbsp;Shoichiro Matsushita,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Terasaki,&nbsp;Shinobu Kunugi,&nbsp;Kazuma Kishi,&nbsp;Tomoyuki Fujisawa,&nbsp;Takafumi Suda,&nbsp;Sakae Homma","doi":"10.1111/crj.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) seropositivity strongly correlates to ANCA-associated vasculitis. Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) without systemic vasculitis are sometimes ANCA-positive. Radiological and pathological differences between patients with myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA-positive and those with proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA-positive IIPs remain unclear. To determine whether high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features and pathology findings differ by ANCA subtype in ANCA-positive IIP patients in a national database. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data were examined along with a web-based multidisciplinary discussion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed records of 10 MPO-ANCA-positive and 9 PR3-ANCA-positive IIP patients who underwent HRCT and surgical lung biopsy between April 2009 and March 2014. Pulmonologists, chest radiologists, and pathologists evaluated HRCT scans and pathological findings independently. Patterns were classified using ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011 guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>HRCT patterns were definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (<i>n</i> = 8; 42.1%), possible UIP (<i>n</i> = 6; 31.6%), and inconsistent with UIP (<i>n</i> = 5; 26.3%). Pathological patterns were definite UIP (n = 5; 26.3%), probable UIP (n = 8; 42.1%), possible UIP (<i>n</i> = 4; 21.1%), and not UIP (<i>n</i> = 2; 10.5%). HRCT and pathological patterns did not differ between MPO-ANCA-positive and PR3-ANCA-positive IIPs. Radiological features were reticulation (<i>n</i> = 13; 68.4%), nodules (<i>n</i> = 12; 63.1%), honeycombing (<i>n</i> = 10; 52.6%), and increased attenuation around honeycombing (<i>n</i> = 7; 36.8%). Pathological findings were cysts (<i>n</i> = 12; 63.1%), lymphoid follicles with germinal centers (<i>n</i> = 11; 57.9%), and peribronchiolar wall lymphocytic infiltration (<i>n</i> = 11; 57.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HRCT and pathological patterns did not differ between MPO-ANCA-positive and PR3-ANCA-positive IIPs. This absence of significant differences suggests a similar mechanism underlying both types of interstitial pneumonia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70061","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) seropositivity strongly correlates to ANCA-associated vasculitis. Patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) without systemic vasculitis are sometimes ANCA-positive. Radiological and pathological differences between patients with myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA-positive and those with proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA-positive IIPs remain unclear. To determine whether high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) features and pathology findings differ by ANCA subtype in ANCA-positive IIP patients in a national database. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data were examined along with a web-based multidisciplinary discussion.

Methods

We reviewed records of 10 MPO-ANCA-positive and 9 PR3-ANCA-positive IIP patients who underwent HRCT and surgical lung biopsy between April 2009 and March 2014. Pulmonologists, chest radiologists, and pathologists evaluated HRCT scans and pathological findings independently. Patterns were classified using ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT 2011 guidelines for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Results

HRCT patterns were definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (n = 8; 42.1%), possible UIP (n = 6; 31.6%), and inconsistent with UIP (n = 5; 26.3%). Pathological patterns were definite UIP (n = 5; 26.3%), probable UIP (n = 8; 42.1%), possible UIP (n = 4; 21.1%), and not UIP (n = 2; 10.5%). HRCT and pathological patterns did not differ between MPO-ANCA-positive and PR3-ANCA-positive IIPs. Radiological features were reticulation (n = 13; 68.4%), nodules (n = 12; 63.1%), honeycombing (n = 10; 52.6%), and increased attenuation around honeycombing (n = 7; 36.8%). Pathological findings were cysts (n = 12; 63.1%), lymphoid follicles with germinal centers (n = 11; 57.9%), and peribronchiolar wall lymphocytic infiltration (n = 11; 57.9%).

Conclusion

HRCT and pathological patterns did not differ between MPO-ANCA-positive and PR3-ANCA-positive IIPs. This absence of significant differences suggests a similar mechanism underlying both types of interstitial pneumonia.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信