Roles of Soil and Atmospheric Dryness on Terrestrial Vegetation Productivity in China - Which Dominates at What Thresholds

IF 7.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Earths Future Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1029/2024EF005469
Tianzi Wang, Jingwen Zhang, Zejun Li, Kairong Lin, Wang Zhou, Genghong Wu, Ming Pan, Xiaohong Chen
{"title":"Roles of Soil and Atmospheric Dryness on Terrestrial Vegetation Productivity in China - Which Dominates at What Thresholds","authors":"Tianzi Wang,&nbsp;Jingwen Zhang,&nbsp;Zejun Li,&nbsp;Kairong Lin,&nbsp;Wang Zhou,&nbsp;Genghong Wu,&nbsp;Ming Pan,&nbsp;Xiaohong Chen","doi":"10.1029/2024EF005469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Low soil moisture (SM) and high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) can reduce vegetation productivity (gross primary productivity (GPP)) and weaken terrestrial carbon stock. However, the roles of SM and VPD on GPP vary widely in terms of (a) which one dominates the impact (dominance) and (b) the specific threshold values at which they are activated (thresholds). This study adopted the copula method to investigate the dominance and thresholds of SM and VPD on terrestrial vegetation productivity reduction (GPP reduction) across China from 1982 to 2018. The results indicate that SM predominantly drives the GPP reduction across 71% of China's vegetation zones, with the SM thresholds decreasing from the south to the north. Vapor pressure deficit dominated the GPP reduction primarily in the croplands with low VPD thresholds, such as the North China Plain and Northeast Plain. Moreover, the SM and VPD thresholds have significant difference across different ecosystems, with higher SM thresholds (activated under wetter soil conditions) in the forests and lower VPD thresholds (activated under more humid atmospheric conditions) in the croplands. Compared with the non-irrigated croplands, irrigation can significantly reduce SM thresholds and increase VPD thresholds by relieving water stress from soil and atmospheric dryness. The structural equation modeling further demonstrates the dominant influence of SM and VPD on GPP reduction. This study explicitly identified the spatial distribution of the dominance and thresholds of soil and atmospheric dryness across different ecosystems. It could enhance our understanding of terrestrial ecosystem sensitivity to drought and provide guidance for drought management in different ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF005469","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF005469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Low soil moisture (SM) and high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) can reduce vegetation productivity (gross primary productivity (GPP)) and weaken terrestrial carbon stock. However, the roles of SM and VPD on GPP vary widely in terms of (a) which one dominates the impact (dominance) and (b) the specific threshold values at which they are activated (thresholds). This study adopted the copula method to investigate the dominance and thresholds of SM and VPD on terrestrial vegetation productivity reduction (GPP reduction) across China from 1982 to 2018. The results indicate that SM predominantly drives the GPP reduction across 71% of China's vegetation zones, with the SM thresholds decreasing from the south to the north. Vapor pressure deficit dominated the GPP reduction primarily in the croplands with low VPD thresholds, such as the North China Plain and Northeast Plain. Moreover, the SM and VPD thresholds have significant difference across different ecosystems, with higher SM thresholds (activated under wetter soil conditions) in the forests and lower VPD thresholds (activated under more humid atmospheric conditions) in the croplands. Compared with the non-irrigated croplands, irrigation can significantly reduce SM thresholds and increase VPD thresholds by relieving water stress from soil and atmospheric dryness. The structural equation modeling further demonstrates the dominant influence of SM and VPD on GPP reduction. This study explicitly identified the spatial distribution of the dominance and thresholds of soil and atmospheric dryness across different ecosystems. It could enhance our understanding of terrestrial ecosystem sensitivity to drought and provide guidance for drought management in different ecosystems.

Abstract Image

土壤和大气干燥对中国陆地植被生产力的影响——在什么阈值下起主导作用
低土壤湿度(SM)和高水汽压差(VPD)会降低植被生产力(GPP),削弱陆地碳储量。然而,SM和VPD对GPP的作用在(a)哪一个主导影响(优势)和(b)它们被激活的特定阈值(阈值)方面差异很大。采用copula方法研究了1982 - 2018年中国陆地植被生产力降低(GPP reduction)中SM和VPD的优势度和阈值。结果表明,在中国71%的植被带中,SM主导了GPP的降低,SM阈值自南向北递减。水汽压亏缺主导GPP减少,主要发生在VPD阈值较低的农田,如华北平原和东北平原。此外,不同生态系统的SM阈值和VPD阈值存在显著差异,森林的SM阈值(在土壤湿润条件下激活)较高,农田的VPD阈值(在大气湿润条件下激活)较低。与未灌溉区相比,灌溉区通过缓解土壤和大气干旱的水分胁迫,显著降低了SM阈值,提高了VPD阈值。结构方程模型进一步证明了SM和VPD对GPP还原的主导作用。本研究明确了不同生态系统土壤和大气干燥的优势度和阈值的空间分布。研究结果可提高我们对陆地生态系统干旱敏感性的认识,为不同生态系统的干旱管理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earths Future
Earths Future ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
260
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信