The effectiveness of a body positioning device for controlling patient movement and additional sedative use during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A retrospective analysis

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70095
Haruka Masuda, Tsutomu Nishida, Kengo Matsumoto, Dai Nakamatsu, Shiro Hayashi, Masashi Yamamoto
{"title":"The effectiveness of a body positioning device for controlling patient movement and additional sedative use during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A retrospective analysis","authors":"Haruka Masuda,&nbsp;Tsutomu Nishida,&nbsp;Kengo Matsumoto,&nbsp;Dai Nakamatsu,&nbsp;Shiro Hayashi,&nbsp;Masashi Yamamoto","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography requires precise body movement control for procedural safety and efficiency. Sedatives are commonly used but pose risks, especially in elderly patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Medo V-Fix device in controlling patient movement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1723 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures performed between January 2021 and March 2024, 1,528 were analyzed after excluding cases with missing data. Patients were divided into two groups, the device group (<i>n</i> = 697) and the nondevice group (<i>n</i> = 831). The groups were compared with respect to body movement control, additional sedative administration, sedation-related complications, and procedure discontinuation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Body movement control was better with the device (good, 65.7%; poor, 24.0%; and very poor, 10.3%) than without it (good, 48.1%; poor, 30.7%; and very poor, 21.2%; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The device reduced the need for manual assistance and additional sedatives. Fewer patients in the device group (9.5% vs. 15.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) required an additional thiopental dose, and the dose was lower (4.5 mg vs. 6 mg, <i>p</i> = 0.0015). No procedure discontinuation occurred in the device group, whereas five discontinuations occurred in the nondevice group. Although hypoxemia was more frequent in the device group (14.5% vs. 8.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.0005), no severe adverse events occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The Medo V-Fix device significantly improved body movement control and reduced the need for additional doses of sedatives and manual intervention. Despite a higher incidence of mild hypoxemia, these events were appropriately managed with routine monitoring, indicating that the device increases procedural safety and efficiency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography requires precise body movement control for procedural safety and efficiency. Sedatives are commonly used but pose risks, especially in elderly patients. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the Medo V-Fix device in controlling patient movement during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Methods

Of 1723 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures performed between January 2021 and March 2024, 1,528 were analyzed after excluding cases with missing data. Patients were divided into two groups, the device group (n = 697) and the nondevice group (n = 831). The groups were compared with respect to body movement control, additional sedative administration, sedation-related complications, and procedure discontinuation.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Body movement control was better with the device (good, 65.7%; poor, 24.0%; and very poor, 10.3%) than without it (good, 48.1%; poor, 30.7%; and very poor, 21.2%; p < 0.0001). The device reduced the need for manual assistance and additional sedatives. Fewer patients in the device group (9.5% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.0003) required an additional thiopental dose, and the dose was lower (4.5 mg vs. 6 mg, p = 0.0015). No procedure discontinuation occurred in the device group, whereas five discontinuations occurred in the nondevice group. Although hypoxemia was more frequent in the device group (14.5% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.0005), no severe adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

The Medo V-Fix device significantly improved body movement control and reduced the need for additional doses of sedatives and manual intervention. Despite a higher incidence of mild hypoxemia, these events were appropriately managed with routine monitoring, indicating that the device increases procedural safety and efficiency.

Abstract Image

在内窥镜逆行胆管造影术中,身体定位装置控制患者运动和额外镇静剂使用的有效性:回顾性分析
背景内镜逆行胰胆管造影需要精确的身体运动控制以保证手术的安全性和效率。镇静剂常用,但存在风险,尤其是对老年患者。本研究评估了Medo V-Fix装置在内镜逆行胆管造影术中控制患者运动的有效性。方法在2021年1月至2024年3月期间进行的1723例内镜逆行胆管造影手术中,剔除数据缺失的病例,对1528例进行分析。患者分为两组,有器械组(n = 697)和无器械组(n = 831)。比较两组患者的身体运动控制、额外镇静给药、镇静相关并发症和手术中止情况。结果两组患者基线特征相似。使用该装置后,患者的身体运动控制能力较好(良好,65.7%;穷,24.0%;非常差,占10.3%),而不是没有(良好,占48.1%;穷,30.7%;非常穷的占21.2%;p & lt;0.0001)。该装置减少了人工辅助和额外镇静剂的需要。器械组中需要额外硫喷妥钠剂量的患者较少(9.5%对15.6%,p = 0.0003),且剂量较低(4.5 mg对6 mg, p = 0.0015)。在器械组中没有发生手术中断,而在非器械组中有5例手术中断。虽然低氧血症在器械组更常见(14.5%比8.8%,p = 0.0005),但未发生严重不良事件。结论Medo V-Fix装置显著改善了身体运动控制,减少了额外剂量的镇静剂和人工干预的需要。尽管轻度低氧血症的发生率较高,但这些事件在常规监测下得到了适当的管理,这表明该设备提高了手术安全性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信