Janie R. Robinson, Glenda Daniels, Jacquelyn S. Pennings, Jermaine Rucker
{"title":"Health Knowledge of Undergraduate College Students During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic","authors":"Janie R. Robinson, Glenda Daniels, Jacquelyn S. Pennings, Jermaine Rucker","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/5545760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Health knowledge and health literacy are key factors that influence health promotion and disease prevention. During the COVID-19 pandemic, undergraduate college students were faced with multiple stressors that influenced their health. Health knowledge and health literacy could have improved their overall health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore health perceptions, health behaviors, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, general health knowledge, and understanding of health disparities in undergraduate college students. Students were recruited through the university’s email. An online Qualtrics survey was distributed through the email system to a stratified random sample. Two-hundred eleven students participated in the study. The majority of respondents were female (71.5%) and Caucasian (61.1%) and reported excellent or good physical health (80.6%). However, over 40% reported only fair/poor mental health (44.3%). Nonwhite students had 2.2 times higher odds of not having had a well-visit within the past 2 years. Students with lower parental income had higher odds of reporting a negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased stress, mental health issues, social isolation, and financial issues were the most reported effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Students expressed that discussing mental health was uncomfortable, and there is a stigma associated with mental illness. Students who were older than 21 years of age displayed a higher health knowledge than younger students. Almost half of the students demonstrated a basic knowledge of the definition of health disparities. While a majority of the students in this study engaged in healthy behaviors, the findings revealed that there was a reluctance to express feelings of mental health. This reluctance could lead to mental distress. Therefore, university programs are needed to assist students with discussing mental health and identifying appropriate resources. Understanding health can decrease stressors related to illness and can improve mental and physical health in the long term.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/5545760","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/5545760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health knowledge and health literacy are key factors that influence health promotion and disease prevention. During the COVID-19 pandemic, undergraduate college students were faced with multiple stressors that influenced their health. Health knowledge and health literacy could have improved their overall health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore health perceptions, health behaviors, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, general health knowledge, and understanding of health disparities in undergraduate college students. Students were recruited through the university’s email. An online Qualtrics survey was distributed through the email system to a stratified random sample. Two-hundred eleven students participated in the study. The majority of respondents were female (71.5%) and Caucasian (61.1%) and reported excellent or good physical health (80.6%). However, over 40% reported only fair/poor mental health (44.3%). Nonwhite students had 2.2 times higher odds of not having had a well-visit within the past 2 years. Students with lower parental income had higher odds of reporting a negative financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased stress, mental health issues, social isolation, and financial issues were the most reported effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Students expressed that discussing mental health was uncomfortable, and there is a stigma associated with mental illness. Students who were older than 21 years of age displayed a higher health knowledge than younger students. Almost half of the students demonstrated a basic knowledge of the definition of health disparities. While a majority of the students in this study engaged in healthy behaviors, the findings revealed that there was a reluctance to express feelings of mental health. This reluctance could lead to mental distress. Therefore, university programs are needed to assist students with discussing mental health and identifying appropriate resources. Understanding health can decrease stressors related to illness and can improve mental and physical health in the long term.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.