Using Deep Learning in Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting: Exploring the Predictive Value of Explicit Snowpack Information

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Parthkumar Modi, Keith Jennings, Joseph Kasprzyk, Eric Small, Cameron Wobus, Ben Livneh
{"title":"Using Deep Learning in Ensemble Streamflow Forecasting: Exploring the Predictive Value of Explicit Snowpack Information","authors":"Parthkumar Modi,&nbsp;Keith Jennings,&nbsp;Joseph Kasprzyk,&nbsp;Eric Small,&nbsp;Cameron Wobus,&nbsp;Ben Livneh","doi":"10.1029/2024MS004582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework combines a probabilistic forecast structure with process-based models for water supply predictions. However, process-based models require computationally intensive parameter estimation, increasing uncertainties and limiting usability. Motivated by the strong performance of deep learning models, we seek to assess whether the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model can provide skillful forecasts and replace process-based models within the ESP framework. Given challenges in <i>implicitly</i> capturing snowpack dynamics within LSTMs for streamflow prediction, we also evaluated the added skill of <i>explicitly</i> incorporating snowpack information to improve hydrologic memory representation. LSTM-ESPs were evaluated under four different scenarios: one excluding snow and three including snow with varied snowpack representations. The LSTM models were trained using information from 664 GAGES-II basins during WY1983–2000. During a testing period, WY2001–2010, 80% of basins exhibited Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) above 0.5 with a median NSE of around 0.70, indicating satisfactory utility in simulating seasonal water supply. LSTM-ESP forecasts were then tested during WY2011–2020 over 76 western US basins with operational Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) forecasts. A key finding is that in high snow regions, LSTM-ESP forecasts using simplified ablation assumptions performed worse than those excluding snow, highlighting that snow data do not consistently improve LSTM-ESP performance. However, LSTM-ESP forecasts that explicitly incorporated past years' snow accumulation and ablation performed comparably to NRCS forecasts and better than forecasts excluding snow entirely. Overall, integrating deep learning within an ESP framework shows promise and highlights important considerations for including snowpack information in forecasting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024MS004582","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024MS004582","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework combines a probabilistic forecast structure with process-based models for water supply predictions. However, process-based models require computationally intensive parameter estimation, increasing uncertainties and limiting usability. Motivated by the strong performance of deep learning models, we seek to assess whether the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model can provide skillful forecasts and replace process-based models within the ESP framework. Given challenges in implicitly capturing snowpack dynamics within LSTMs for streamflow prediction, we also evaluated the added skill of explicitly incorporating snowpack information to improve hydrologic memory representation. LSTM-ESPs were evaluated under four different scenarios: one excluding snow and three including snow with varied snowpack representations. The LSTM models were trained using information from 664 GAGES-II basins during WY1983–2000. During a testing period, WY2001–2010, 80% of basins exhibited Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) above 0.5 with a median NSE of around 0.70, indicating satisfactory utility in simulating seasonal water supply. LSTM-ESP forecasts were then tested during WY2011–2020 over 76 western US basins with operational Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) forecasts. A key finding is that in high snow regions, LSTM-ESP forecasts using simplified ablation assumptions performed worse than those excluding snow, highlighting that snow data do not consistently improve LSTM-ESP performance. However, LSTM-ESP forecasts that explicitly incorporated past years' snow accumulation and ablation performed comparably to NRCS forecasts and better than forecasts excluding snow entirely. Overall, integrating deep learning within an ESP framework shows promise and highlights important considerations for including snowpack information in forecasting.

Abstract Image

深度学习在集成流预报中的应用:探讨显性积雪信息的预测价值
集成流流量预测(ESP)框架结合了概率预测结构和基于过程的供水预测模型。然而,基于过程的模型需要计算密集的参数估计,增加了不确定性,限制了可用性。由于深度学习模型的强大性能,我们试图评估长短期记忆(LSTM)模型是否可以提供熟练的预测并取代ESP框架内基于过程的模型。考虑到在lstm中隐式捕获积雪动态以进行流量预测的挑战,我们还评估了显式合并积雪信息以改善水文记忆表示的附加技能。lstm - esp在四种不同的情景下进行了评估:一种是不含雪,三种是含雪,积雪表现不同。LSTM模型的训练使用了664个GAGES-II流域在1983 - 2000年间的信息。在2001 - 2010年的测试期间,80%的流域的纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)在0.5以上,中位数NSE约为0.70,表明在模拟季节性供水方面的效用令人满意。2011年至2020年期间,LSTM-ESP预测在美国西部76个盆地进行了测试,并进行了自然资源保护服务(NRCS)的预测。一个重要的发现是,在高降雪地区,使用简化消融假设的LSTM-ESP预测结果比不考虑降雪的预测结果更差,这表明降雪数据并不能持续提高LSTM-ESP的性能。然而,明确考虑了过去几年积雪和消融的LSTM-ESP预报效果与NRCS预报相当,优于完全不考虑降雪的预报。总的来说,将深度学习集成到ESP框架中显示了前景,并强调了在预测中包括积雪信息的重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信