Psittacosis Outbreak in Europe: A Concern for Public Health

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Salomon Izere, Hope Intwari Munyaneza, Faisal Ahmed
{"title":"Psittacosis Outbreak in Europe: A Concern for Public Health","authors":"Salomon Izere,&nbsp;Hope Intwari Munyaneza,&nbsp;Faisal Ahmed","doi":"10.1111/crj.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Psittacosis, also known as parrot fever or ornithosis, is a zoonotic bacterial infectious disease caused by <i>Chlamydia psittaci</i>, an obligatory intracellular organism [<span>1</span>]. The infection is primarily transmitted through contact with infected avian species, leading to a diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations and severity. <i>Chlamydia psittaci</i> predominantly resides in birds, particularly those within the Psittaciformes order, which includes species such as parakeets, parrots, lorikeets, cockatoos, and budgerigars, as well as birds from the Galliformes order, including chickens, turkeys, and pheasants. Notably, any bird species can potentially harbor the disease [<span>2</span>].</p><p>The primary risk factor for transmission to humans involves direct contact with infected birds or inhalation of aerosolized pathogens resulting from their urine, feces, respiratory secretions, and ocular exudates (Figure 1) [<span>3-5</span>]. Although there are occasional reports of human-to-human transmission, such occurrences are considered rare. Additionally, humans may contract psittacosis through exposure to <i>C. psittaci</i> present in aborted products from equine sources, thus underlining the significance of a One Health approach to understanding the disease.</p><p>Symptoms of psittacosis can vary from mild to severe, with complications such as pneumonia occurring frequently and posing a risk of fatality, as evidenced by recent outbreaks documented in Europe [<span>4, 5</span>]. Typically, symptoms manifest within a timeframe of 5 to 14 days following exposure to the pathogen. The management of psittacosis-related pneumonia necessitates the use of antimicrobial drugs, particularly as pulmonary involvement is prevalent at the time of diagnosis. Currently, antibiotics such as tetracyclines and chloramphenicol are the preferred therapeutic agents. Most patients respond favorably to oral administration of chloramphenicol palmitate, tetracycline hydrochloride, or doxycycline [<span>4</span>]. For critically ill patients, intravenous administration of doxycycline hyclate may be considered an initial treatment option. Symptoms generally begin to remit within a period of 48 to 72 h. It is imperative that, following the resolution of fever, the course of treatment is maintained for a minimum of 10 to 14 days to mitigate the risk of relapse [<span>1, 4</span>].</p><p>Psittacosis can affect individuals regardless of age or gender; however, its incidence appears to peak among individuals aged 35 to 55 [<span>4</span>]. The first documented case of psittacosis was identified in 1879 when seven individuals in Switzerland were diagnosed with pneumonia following exposure to tropical pet finches and parrots [<span>6</span>], although the infectious agent was not initially recognized. Subsequent pandemics occurred in 1929 and 1930 [<span>6, 7</span>]. Despite remaining relatively rare, psittacosis is currently regarded as a significant public health concern in various European Countries [<span>8</span>]. Notably, there has been a concerning increase in reported cases in Austria, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands since late 2023, as detailed in Table 1 [<span>1</span>]. This escalation has prompted epidemiological investigations to identify likely sources of exposure and clusters of the disease. The increase in psittacosis cases during the years 2023 to 2024 may be partially attributed to climatic factors, including changes in temperature, precipitation, or frost patterns, which could affect bird migration, behavior, or the aerosolization of droppings. Further research is warranted to examine these potential influences.</p><p>As of February 2024, the countries listed in Table 1 reported an alarming rise in psittacosis cases diagnosed both in 2023 and early 2024, particularly from November to December 2023. This surge has resulted in five reported fatalities in these nations, underscoring the seriousness of this public health issue. The majority of the cases involved exposure to either wild or domestic avian species.</p><p>A similar trend in a rural Australian town has been noted, where individuals who spend substantial time outdoors or engage in lawn mowing activities exhibit a significantly higher likelihood of contracting psittacosis. This phenomenon may be attributable to the inhalation of aerosolized bird droppings [<span>10</span>].</p><p>In Austria, the count of confirmed psittacosis cases in 2023 has exceeded the average number reported over the preceding 8 years, with no instances linked to travel. The absence of wild birds as a recognized source of the illness has left health officials in a state of perplexity. The consistency of diagnostic methods underscores the importance of maintaining vigilance [<span>1, 7, 11</span>]. Conversely, Denmark has experienced a notable uptick in reported cases, with 23 individuals testing positive for <i>C. psittaci</i>. The majority of these cases have emerged in northern Denmark, Zealand, and the capital region [<span>12</span>]. Regrettably, four patients were lost to follow-up. Epidemiological investigations have established connections to wild birds, particularly through the use of bird feeders. Although transmission from chickens has been excluded, the source of infection remains ambiguous. Of the hospitalized individuals, 17 cases (74%) required admission, with 15 suffering from pneumonia, and four fatalities recorded [<span>1</span>].</p><p>Over the past 5 years, Denmark has consistently reported between 15 and 30 human cases annually, predominantly associated with exposure to domestic birds, such as parrots, parakeets, and hobby birds like racing pigeons, as well as ducks during hunting activities. However, several cases each year indicate no direct contact with birds, suggesting the possibility of environmental contamination [<span>1, 11</span>]. There is currently no evidence suggesting additional testing or modifications in testing techniques in Denmark that could elucidate the recent increase in psittacosis cases.</p><p>As a consequence of inhaling airborne particles from the desiccated droppings of infected birds, the Statens Serum Institute and the National Health Institute of Denmark posit that diseases are predominantly associated with wild birds. To elucidate this matter, samples of wild birds submitted for avian influenza testing will be subjected to examination. Currently, the prevalence of <i>C. psittaci</i> among wild birds in Denmark remains unknown [<span>1, 11</span>]. It is surmised that the number of individuals infected with <i>C. psittaci</i> exceeds documented cases.</p><p>Moreover, in December 2023, Germany reported five additional instances of <i>C. psittaci</i>, thereby increasing the total number of confirmed cases to 14 for the year 2023. As of February 20, 2024, five further verified instances of psittacosis have been recorded. Aside from a notable clustering of cases in the Hannover region over the past year, no additional geographic clusters have been reported. Pneumonia affected nearly all cases (18 out of 19), with 16 requiring hospitalization [<span>1, 11</span>]. Of the 19 reported cases from January 1, 2023, to February 19, 2024, only 26% (five out of 19) had associated exposure information related to domesticated birds, such as parrots, chickens, or breeding pigeons. Notably, no cases provided information regarding exposure to wild birds. Germany has maintained an average of 15 cases annually over the last 5 years, peaking at 19 cases in 2022 and reaching a low of 11 in 2019. Typically, one or two cases are reported each month. Antibody testing has confirmed approximately 72% (56 out of 78) of cases recorded in the past 5 years; however, the availability of bird exposure data frequently remains inadequate. In late November and early December 2023, Sweden experienced an unusual increase in psittacosis cases, reporting seven instances in November and 19 in December. This surge indicates a doubling of cases compared to the same months in the previous 5 years [<span>1, 7</span>].</p><p>Nevertheless, in January and February 2024, fewer occurrences were reported than during the same period over the preceding five years combined, with 10 cases in January and three in February. Since 2017, there has been a documented overall increase in psittacosis cases in Sweden.</p><p>Geographically, eight out of Sweden's 21 regions, concentrated in the southernmost part of the country, have reported documented cases as of early November 2023. A limited number of cases have resulted from contact with droppings of small birds via feeders, while some cases are believed to have originated from domestic birds such as hens or cockatoos. The increase in reported diagnoses may be attributed, in part, to advancements in RT-PCR testing methodologies. Lastly, The Netherlands has observed a rise in confirmed cases of psittacosis since late December 2023. As of February 29, 2024, 21 individuals have tested positive for <i>C. psittaci</i>, double the instances reported during the same time frame the previous year. Over the last decade, the average number of cases during this period has been nine.</p><p>There has been a geographic distribution of recent cases across the nation, yet no common source of infection has been identified. The patients' ages ranged from 37 to 86 years, with a predominance of 16 men (76%), on average, representing the older demographic [<span>1, 11</span>]. One recent case resulted in mortality, while the remainder required hospitalization. Since late December 2023, a total of 21 instances have been documented, with six cases associated with contact with wild bird droppings, seven linked to domestic bird droppings, and eight cases occurring without any interaction with birds. The testing protocols in the Netherlands have remained consistent over recent years, which may constitute an additional risk factor contributing to the surge in cases. Since 2018, RT-PCR testing has accounted for over 95% of reported notifications.</p><p>In response to the current outbreak, we strongly advocate for enhanced surveillance, prompt reporting, and heightened vigilance [<span>13</span>]. It is essential to monitor the prevalence of <i>C. psittaci</i> in wild birds and to increase awareness among at-risk populations as critical public health measures [<span>5</span>]. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) currently assesses the risk as low, collective efforts are required to avert potential tragedies and future outbreaks [<span>14</span>]. Furthermore, it is vital to educate the general public, healthcare professionals, and birdwatchers regarding this pandemic. Increasing the awareness and suspicion of psittacosis is necessary, as the illness can present symptoms similar to other respiratory infections. Implementation of preventive measures, assurance of early diagnosis, and initiation of treatment, typically with doxycycline, are imperative for effective mitigation of the disease's impact. By collaborating in these efforts, we can significantly reduce the consequences of this outbreak, but such endeavors necessitate our immediate attention and cooperation.</p><p>All authors equally contributed to the preparation of this article.</p><p>The authors have nothing to report.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":55247,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/crj.70068","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/crj.70068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psittacosis, also known as parrot fever or ornithosis, is a zoonotic bacterial infectious disease caused by Chlamydia psittaci, an obligatory intracellular organism [1]. The infection is primarily transmitted through contact with infected avian species, leading to a diverse spectrum of clinical manifestations and severity. Chlamydia psittaci predominantly resides in birds, particularly those within the Psittaciformes order, which includes species such as parakeets, parrots, lorikeets, cockatoos, and budgerigars, as well as birds from the Galliformes order, including chickens, turkeys, and pheasants. Notably, any bird species can potentially harbor the disease [2].

The primary risk factor for transmission to humans involves direct contact with infected birds or inhalation of aerosolized pathogens resulting from their urine, feces, respiratory secretions, and ocular exudates (Figure 1) [3-5]. Although there are occasional reports of human-to-human transmission, such occurrences are considered rare. Additionally, humans may contract psittacosis through exposure to C. psittaci present in aborted products from equine sources, thus underlining the significance of a One Health approach to understanding the disease.

Symptoms of psittacosis can vary from mild to severe, with complications such as pneumonia occurring frequently and posing a risk of fatality, as evidenced by recent outbreaks documented in Europe [4, 5]. Typically, symptoms manifest within a timeframe of 5 to 14 days following exposure to the pathogen. The management of psittacosis-related pneumonia necessitates the use of antimicrobial drugs, particularly as pulmonary involvement is prevalent at the time of diagnosis. Currently, antibiotics such as tetracyclines and chloramphenicol are the preferred therapeutic agents. Most patients respond favorably to oral administration of chloramphenicol palmitate, tetracycline hydrochloride, or doxycycline [4]. For critically ill patients, intravenous administration of doxycycline hyclate may be considered an initial treatment option. Symptoms generally begin to remit within a period of 48 to 72 h. It is imperative that, following the resolution of fever, the course of treatment is maintained for a minimum of 10 to 14 days to mitigate the risk of relapse [1, 4].

Psittacosis can affect individuals regardless of age or gender; however, its incidence appears to peak among individuals aged 35 to 55 [4]. The first documented case of psittacosis was identified in 1879 when seven individuals in Switzerland were diagnosed with pneumonia following exposure to tropical pet finches and parrots [6], although the infectious agent was not initially recognized. Subsequent pandemics occurred in 1929 and 1930 [6, 7]. Despite remaining relatively rare, psittacosis is currently regarded as a significant public health concern in various European Countries [8]. Notably, there has been a concerning increase in reported cases in Austria, Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands since late 2023, as detailed in Table 1 [1]. This escalation has prompted epidemiological investigations to identify likely sources of exposure and clusters of the disease. The increase in psittacosis cases during the years 2023 to 2024 may be partially attributed to climatic factors, including changes in temperature, precipitation, or frost patterns, which could affect bird migration, behavior, or the aerosolization of droppings. Further research is warranted to examine these potential influences.

As of February 2024, the countries listed in Table 1 reported an alarming rise in psittacosis cases diagnosed both in 2023 and early 2024, particularly from November to December 2023. This surge has resulted in five reported fatalities in these nations, underscoring the seriousness of this public health issue. The majority of the cases involved exposure to either wild or domestic avian species.

A similar trend in a rural Australian town has been noted, where individuals who spend substantial time outdoors or engage in lawn mowing activities exhibit a significantly higher likelihood of contracting psittacosis. This phenomenon may be attributable to the inhalation of aerosolized bird droppings [10].

In Austria, the count of confirmed psittacosis cases in 2023 has exceeded the average number reported over the preceding 8 years, with no instances linked to travel. The absence of wild birds as a recognized source of the illness has left health officials in a state of perplexity. The consistency of diagnostic methods underscores the importance of maintaining vigilance [1, 7, 11]. Conversely, Denmark has experienced a notable uptick in reported cases, with 23 individuals testing positive for C. psittaci. The majority of these cases have emerged in northern Denmark, Zealand, and the capital region [12]. Regrettably, four patients were lost to follow-up. Epidemiological investigations have established connections to wild birds, particularly through the use of bird feeders. Although transmission from chickens has been excluded, the source of infection remains ambiguous. Of the hospitalized individuals, 17 cases (74%) required admission, with 15 suffering from pneumonia, and four fatalities recorded [1].

Over the past 5 years, Denmark has consistently reported between 15 and 30 human cases annually, predominantly associated with exposure to domestic birds, such as parrots, parakeets, and hobby birds like racing pigeons, as well as ducks during hunting activities. However, several cases each year indicate no direct contact with birds, suggesting the possibility of environmental contamination [1, 11]. There is currently no evidence suggesting additional testing or modifications in testing techniques in Denmark that could elucidate the recent increase in psittacosis cases.

As a consequence of inhaling airborne particles from the desiccated droppings of infected birds, the Statens Serum Institute and the National Health Institute of Denmark posit that diseases are predominantly associated with wild birds. To elucidate this matter, samples of wild birds submitted for avian influenza testing will be subjected to examination. Currently, the prevalence of C. psittaci among wild birds in Denmark remains unknown [1, 11]. It is surmised that the number of individuals infected with C. psittaci exceeds documented cases.

Moreover, in December 2023, Germany reported five additional instances of C. psittaci, thereby increasing the total number of confirmed cases to 14 for the year 2023. As of February 20, 2024, five further verified instances of psittacosis have been recorded. Aside from a notable clustering of cases in the Hannover region over the past year, no additional geographic clusters have been reported. Pneumonia affected nearly all cases (18 out of 19), with 16 requiring hospitalization [1, 11]. Of the 19 reported cases from January 1, 2023, to February 19, 2024, only 26% (five out of 19) had associated exposure information related to domesticated birds, such as parrots, chickens, or breeding pigeons. Notably, no cases provided information regarding exposure to wild birds. Germany has maintained an average of 15 cases annually over the last 5 years, peaking at 19 cases in 2022 and reaching a low of 11 in 2019. Typically, one or two cases are reported each month. Antibody testing has confirmed approximately 72% (56 out of 78) of cases recorded in the past 5 years; however, the availability of bird exposure data frequently remains inadequate. In late November and early December 2023, Sweden experienced an unusual increase in psittacosis cases, reporting seven instances in November and 19 in December. This surge indicates a doubling of cases compared to the same months in the previous 5 years [1, 7].

Nevertheless, in January and February 2024, fewer occurrences were reported than during the same period over the preceding five years combined, with 10 cases in January and three in February. Since 2017, there has been a documented overall increase in psittacosis cases in Sweden.

Geographically, eight out of Sweden's 21 regions, concentrated in the southernmost part of the country, have reported documented cases as of early November 2023. A limited number of cases have resulted from contact with droppings of small birds via feeders, while some cases are believed to have originated from domestic birds such as hens or cockatoos. The increase in reported diagnoses may be attributed, in part, to advancements in RT-PCR testing methodologies. Lastly, The Netherlands has observed a rise in confirmed cases of psittacosis since late December 2023. As of February 29, 2024, 21 individuals have tested positive for C. psittaci, double the instances reported during the same time frame the previous year. Over the last decade, the average number of cases during this period has been nine.

There has been a geographic distribution of recent cases across the nation, yet no common source of infection has been identified. The patients' ages ranged from 37 to 86 years, with a predominance of 16 men (76%), on average, representing the older demographic [1, 11]. One recent case resulted in mortality, while the remainder required hospitalization. Since late December 2023, a total of 21 instances have been documented, with six cases associated with contact with wild bird droppings, seven linked to domestic bird droppings, and eight cases occurring without any interaction with birds. The testing protocols in the Netherlands have remained consistent over recent years, which may constitute an additional risk factor contributing to the surge in cases. Since 2018, RT-PCR testing has accounted for over 95% of reported notifications.

In response to the current outbreak, we strongly advocate for enhanced surveillance, prompt reporting, and heightened vigilance [13]. It is essential to monitor the prevalence of C. psittaci in wild birds and to increase awareness among at-risk populations as critical public health measures [5]. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) currently assesses the risk as low, collective efforts are required to avert potential tragedies and future outbreaks [14]. Furthermore, it is vital to educate the general public, healthcare professionals, and birdwatchers regarding this pandemic. Increasing the awareness and suspicion of psittacosis is necessary, as the illness can present symptoms similar to other respiratory infections. Implementation of preventive measures, assurance of early diagnosis, and initiation of treatment, typically with doxycycline, are imperative for effective mitigation of the disease's impact. By collaborating in these efforts, we can significantly reduce the consequences of this outbreak, but such endeavors necessitate our immediate attention and cooperation.

All authors equally contributed to the preparation of this article.

The authors have nothing to report.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

欧洲鹦鹉热的爆发:对公共卫生的关注
鹦鹉热,也被称为鹦鹉热或鸟病,是由鹦鹉衣原体引起的一种人畜共患的细菌性传染病,是一种必须的细胞内生物。该感染主要通过与受感染的禽类接触传播,导致多种临床表现和严重程度。鹦鹉螺衣原体主要存在于鸟类中,尤其是鹦鹉形目的鸟类,鹦鹉形目包括长尾小鹦鹉、鹦鹉、鹦鹉、鹦鹉和虎皮鹦鹉等物种,以及鹦鹉形目的鸟类,包括鸡、火鸡和野鸡。值得注意的是,任何鸟类都可能携带这种疾病。传播给人类的主要危险因素包括直接接触受感染的禽类或吸入由其尿液、粪便、呼吸道分泌物和眼渗出液产生的雾化病原体(图1)[3-5]。虽然偶尔有人际传播的报告,但这种情况被认为是罕见的。此外,人类可能通过接触马源流产产品中存在的鹦鹉热梭菌而感染鹦鹉热,因此强调了“同一个健康”方法对了解该疾病的重要性。鹦鹉热的症状从轻微到严重不等,经常出现肺炎等并发症,并有死亡风险,最近在欧洲记录的疫情证明了这一点[4,5]。通常,症状在接触病原体后5至14天内出现。鹦鹉热相关肺炎的管理需要使用抗菌药物,特别是在诊断时肺部受累很普遍。目前,四环素类和氯霉素等抗生素是首选的治疗药物。大多数患者对口服棕榈酸氯霉素、盐酸四环素或强力霉素反应良好。对于危重病人,静脉注射水合强力霉素可作为初始治疗选择。症状通常在48至72小时内开始缓解。在发烧消退后,必须至少维持10至14天的治疗过程,以降低复发的风险[1,4]。鹦鹉热可影响个体,无论年龄或性别;然而,其发病率似乎在35至55岁的人群中达到高峰。第一例记录在案的鹦鹉热病例是在1879年发现的,当时瑞士有7个人在接触热带宠物雀和鹦鹉b[6]后被诊断出患有肺炎,尽管最初没有发现感染源。随后的大流行发生在1929年和1930年[6,7]。尽管相对罕见,但鹦鹉热目前在许多欧洲国家被视为一个重大的公共卫生问题。值得注意的是,自2023年底以来,奥地利、丹麦、德国、瑞典和荷兰的报告病例出现了令人担忧的增加,详见表1 bbb。这种升级促使进行流行病学调查,以确定可能的接触源和疾病聚集性。2023年至2024年鹦鹉热病例的增加可能部分归因于气候因素,包括温度、降水或霜冻模式的变化,这些因素可能影响鸟类的迁徙、行为或粪便的雾化。有必要进一步研究这些潜在的影响。截至2024年2月,表1所列国家报告了2023年和2024年初诊断的鹦鹉热病例的惊人增长,特别是在2023年11月至12月期间。据报道,这一激增导致这些国家有5人死亡,凸显了这一公共卫生问题的严重性。大多数病例涉及接触野生或家禽物种。在澳大利亚的一个乡村小镇也发现了类似的趋势,在那里,花大量时间在户外或从事除草活动的人感染鹦鹉热的可能性要高得多。这种现象可能是由于吸入了雾化的鸟粪。在奥地利,2023年确诊的鹦鹉热病例数超过了过去8年报告的平均数量,没有与旅行有关的病例。没有野生鸟类作为公认的疾病来源,这让卫生官员感到困惑。诊断方法的一致性强调了保持警惕的重要性[1,7,11]。相反,丹麦报告的病例明显增加,有23人的鹦鹉螺检测呈阳性。这些病例大多数出现在丹麦北部、新西兰和首都地区bbb。遗憾的是,有4例患者未能随访。流行病学调查已经确定了与野生鸟类的联系,特别是通过使用鸟类喂食器。 虽然已经排除了鸡的传播,但感染源仍然不明确。在住院患者中,17例(74%)需要住院,其中15例患有肺炎,4例死亡。在过去5年中,丹麦每年持续报告15至30例人类病例,主要与接触家禽有关,如鹦鹉、长尾小鹦鹉和赛鸽等业余鸟类,以及在狩猎活动中接触鸭子。然而,每年有几例病例表明没有与鸟类直接接触,这表明可能存在环境污染[1,11]。目前没有证据表明在丹麦进行额外的检测或修改检测技术可以解释最近鹦鹉热病例的增加。丹麦血清研究所和丹麦国家卫生研究所认为,由于吸入受感染鸟类干燥粪便中的空气颗粒,疾病主要与野生鸟类有关。为了弄清这一问题,将对提交作禽流感测试的野鸟样本进行检查。目前,鹦鹉螺在丹麦野生鸟类中的流行情况尚不清楚[1,11]。据推测,感染鹦鹉螺杆菌的人数超过了记录在案的病例。此外,在2023年12月,德国又报告了5例鹦鹉螺杆菌病例,从而使2023年的确诊病例总数增加到14例。截至2024年2月20日,已记录了5例进一步证实的鹦鹉热病例。除了去年汉诺威地区出现了明显的聚集性病例外,未报告出现其他地理聚集性病例。肺炎几乎影响了所有病例(19例中的18例),其中16例需要住院治疗[1,11]。在2023年1月1日至2024年2月19日报告的19例病例中,只有26%(19例中有5例)有与家禽(如鹦鹉、鸡或种鸽)相关的暴露信息。值得注意的是,没有病例提供与野生鸟类接触的信息。在过去5年里,德国平均每年保持15例,2022年达到19例的峰值,2019年降至11例的低点。一般来说,每个月报告一到两个病例。抗体检测确认了过去5年记录的约72%(78例中的56例)病例;然而,鸟类接触数据的可用性往往仍然不足。在2023年11月底和12月初,瑞典出现了不寻常的鹦鹉热病例增加,11月报告了7例,12月报告了19例。这一激增表明,与前5年同期相比,病例数增加了一倍[1,7]。然而,在2024年1月和2月,报告的病例数少于前五年同期的总和,1月为10例,2月为3例。自2017年以来,瑞典的鹦鹉热病例总体上有所增加。从地理上看,截至2023年11月初,瑞典21个地区中有8个地区(集中在该国最南端)报告了有记录的病例。有限数量的病例是由于通过喂食器接触了小型鸟类的粪便造成的,而一些病例据信来自母鸡或凤头鹦鹉等家禽。报告诊断的增加可能部分归因于RT-PCR检测方法的进步。最后,自2023年12月下旬以来,荷兰的鹦鹉热确诊病例有所上升。截至2024年2月29日,已有21人检测出鹦鹉螺杆菌阳性,是去年同期报告病例的两倍。在过去十年中,这一时期的平均病例数为9例。最近的病例在全国各地有地理分布,但没有确定共同的感染源。患者年龄37 - 86岁,男性16例(76%),平均年龄较大[1,11]。最近的一个病例导致死亡,其余病例需要住院治疗。自2023年12月下旬以来,共记录了21例病例,其中6例与接触野鸟粪便有关,7例与家鸟粪便有关,8例与鸟类没有任何相互作用。近年来,荷兰的检测方案一直保持一致,这可能是导致病例激增的另一个风险因素。自2018年以来,RT-PCR检测占报告通报的95%以上。为应对目前的疫情,我们强烈主张加强监测、及时报告和提高警惕。作为重要的公共卫生措施,监测鹦鹉螺杆菌在野生鸟类中的流行情况和提高高危人群的认识至关重要。 虽然世界卫生组织(世卫组织)目前评估的风险很低,但需要集体努力,以避免潜在的悲剧和未来的疫情爆发。此外,对公众、医疗保健专业人员和观鸟者进行有关这次大流行的教育至关重要。提高对鹦鹉热的认识和怀疑是必要的,因为这种疾病可能出现与其他呼吸道感染相似的症状。实施预防措施、确保早期诊断和开始治疗(通常使用强力霉素)是有效减轻疾病影响的必要条件。通过在这些努力中进行合作,我们可以大大减少这次疫情的后果,但这些努力需要我们立即予以关注和合作。所有作者对这篇文章的编写都作出了同样的贡献。作者没有什么可报告的。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Respiratory Journal
Clinical Respiratory Journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Overview Effective with the 2016 volume, this journal will be published in an online-only format. Aims and Scope The Clinical Respiratory Journal (CRJ) provides a forum for clinical research in all areas of respiratory medicine from clinical lung disease to basic research relevant to the clinic. We publish original research, review articles, case studies, editorials and book reviews in all areas of clinical lung disease including: Asthma Allergy COPD Non-invasive ventilation Sleep related breathing disorders Interstitial lung diseases Lung cancer Clinical genetics Rhinitis Airway and lung infection Epidemiology Pediatrics CRJ provides a fast-track service for selected Phase II and Phase III trial studies. Keywords Clinical Respiratory Journal, respiratory, pulmonary, medicine, clinical, lung disease, Abstracting and Indexing Information Academic Search (EBSCO Publishing) Academic Search Alumni Edition (EBSCO Publishing) Embase (Elsevier) Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest) HEED: Health Economic Evaluations Database (Wiley-Blackwell) Hospital Premium Collection (ProQuest) Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics) MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM) ProQuest Central (ProQuest) Science Citation Index Expanded (Clarivate Analytics) SCOPUS (Elsevier)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信