Project-Based Approach as Methodology to Improve Academic Performance of Medical School Students Within the Research Line Teaching Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ekaterina Kldiashvili, Ivane Abiatari, Maia Zarnadze
{"title":"Project-Based Approach as Methodology to Improve Academic Performance of Medical School Students Within the Research Line Teaching Course: A Quasi-Experimental Study","authors":"Ekaterina Kldiashvili,&nbsp;Ivane Abiatari,&nbsp;Maia Zarnadze","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, <i>n</i> = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, <i>n</i> = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, with a significance threshold of <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; <i>t</i>(177) = −20.53, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, <i>t</i>(177) = 13.74, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs<i>.</i> 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70562","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Traditional teaching methods in medical education often fail to engage students or foster critical research skills required for evidence-based medicine. Project-based learning (PBL) is widely recognized for promoting active learning and improving academic performance, although its application in research-focused medical courses remains underexplored, especially in low-resource settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing academic performance and originality compared to traditional literature review-based assessments.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted between March 11, 2024 and May 31, 2024, with 179 twelfth-semester medical students divided into two groups: the experimental group (PBL approach, n = 108) and the control group (literature review-based approach, n = 71). Students in the PBL group completed the full research cycle, including topic selection, data collection, analysis, research paper formulation, while the control group focused on synthesizing existing literature. Academic performance (course grades) and originality (Turnitin similarity percentage) were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, with a significance threshold of p < 0.01.

Results

The PBL group demonstrated significantly higher academic performance (mean: 82.5, median: 85) compared to the control group (mean: 66.5, median: 63.75; t(177) = −20.53, p < 0.01). Similarly, originality improved significantly in the PBL group, with lower similarity scores (mean: 4.17%, median: 4.5%) than the control group (mean: 12.62%, median: 13%, t(177) = 13.74, p < 0.01). Variability in academic performance was slightly higher in the PBL group (standard deviation: 5.80 vs. 4.81), reflecting the individualized nature of PBL.

Conclusion

This study confirms that PBL significantly enhances academic performance and fosters originality among medical students, particularly in research-focused courses. The findings underscore the potential of PBL as a transformative approach to medical education, addressing gaps in traditional methods while aligning with global trends in evidence-based practice and academic integrity. PBL is recommended as an adaptable and effective strategy, especially in resource-limited educational settings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信