A Scoping Review of Interventions Designed to Increase Behavioural Health Service Engagement

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sydney Erickson, Ayah Irbahim, Karrah Bowman, Sadona Thompson, Ashley J. Harrison
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Interventions Designed to Increase Behavioural Health Service Engagement","authors":"Sydney Erickson,&nbsp;Ayah Irbahim,&nbsp;Karrah Bowman,&nbsp;Sadona Thompson,&nbsp;Ashley J. Harrison","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>A documented underutilization of behavioural health interventions with known efficacy for treating psychological disorders exists. Thus, engagement enhancement approaches (EEAs) exist to help increase individuals' use of behavioural health interventions. EEAs target a range of barriers to treatment; therefore, a wide variety of approaches exist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>To better understand what EEA approaches exist and in which contexts they are most widely implemented, this study conducted a scoping review of existing EEAs to increase treatment engagement in effective interventions for behavioural health disorders. Specifically, the purpose of this review was to characterize EEAs by type, modality, target population, and to examine the intersection of these categories. Additionally, this review examined research rigour and cultural considerations among existing EEAs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We found that most of the identified studies targeted individual-level barriers through psychoeducation and awareness campaigns. These primarily focused on adults with substance use disorders or major depressive disorder and occurred in person at a provider location. This review identified several limitations and gaps in the literature regarding EEAs, such a shortage of scientifically rigorous studies that assess these approaches, the lack of cultural adaptations made to EEAs to specifically support minoritized individuals, the narrow focus of targeting individual-level barriers, and the limited scope of target groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review offers clinicians and behavioural health researchers information regarding the selection of approaches to increase engagement in accessing behavioural health interventions, as well as suggestions for future research to address disparities and develop solutions to the systemic barriers of the EEAs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A documented underutilization of behavioural health interventions with known efficacy for treating psychological disorders exists. Thus, engagement enhancement approaches (EEAs) exist to help increase individuals' use of behavioural health interventions. EEAs target a range of barriers to treatment; therefore, a wide variety of approaches exist.

Method

To better understand what EEA approaches exist and in which contexts they are most widely implemented, this study conducted a scoping review of existing EEAs to increase treatment engagement in effective interventions for behavioural health disorders. Specifically, the purpose of this review was to characterize EEAs by type, modality, target population, and to examine the intersection of these categories. Additionally, this review examined research rigour and cultural considerations among existing EEAs.

Results

We found that most of the identified studies targeted individual-level barriers through psychoeducation and awareness campaigns. These primarily focused on adults with substance use disorders or major depressive disorder and occurred in person at a provider location. This review identified several limitations and gaps in the literature regarding EEAs, such a shortage of scientifically rigorous studies that assess these approaches, the lack of cultural adaptations made to EEAs to specifically support minoritized individuals, the narrow focus of targeting individual-level barriers, and the limited scope of target groups.

Conclusions

This review offers clinicians and behavioural health researchers information regarding the selection of approaches to increase engagement in accessing behavioural health interventions, as well as suggestions for future research to address disparities and develop solutions to the systemic barriers of the EEAs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信