Influence of Applied Pressure and Thickness Variation on the Bond Strength Between 3Y-TZP Zirconia and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Paulo Pinto, Óscar Carvalho, Rita Ferreira, Sara Madeira, Filipe S. Silva
{"title":"Influence of Applied Pressure and Thickness Variation on the Bond Strength Between 3Y-TZP Zirconia and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement","authors":"Paulo Pinto,&nbsp;Óscar Carvalho,&nbsp;Rita Ferreira,&nbsp;Sara Madeira,&nbsp;Filipe S. Silva","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the influence of applied pressure on the shear bond strength (SBS) between commercial 3Y-TZP zirconia and self-adhesive resin cement. Five test groups were created, each subjected to different applied pressures: 195.15, 97.47, 48.74, 9.75, and 0.20 kPa. A piston-type shear device was used to assess the effect of these pressures on cement layer thickness and SBS. The results demonstrated that the highest applied pressure (195.15 kPa) produced the thinnest cement layers (36.60 ± 1.67 μm) and the highest SBS values (58.8 ± 1.6 MPa), whereas the lower applied pressure (0.20 kPa) resulted in the thickest cement layers (73.20 ± 1.64 μm) and significantly lower SBS (30.8 ± 2.0 MPa). Regression analysis confirmed a strong correlation (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.82, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) between cement thickness and SBS, indicating that cement thickness is a critical factor influencing adhesion. These findings highlight the importance of controlling applied pressure during cementation to optimize bonding performance. Standardizing pressure application through calibrated pressure devices may improve the durability of zirconia-based restorations and minimize variability during the cementation process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the influence of applied pressure on the shear bond strength (SBS) between commercial 3Y-TZP zirconia and self-adhesive resin cement. Five test groups were created, each subjected to different applied pressures: 195.15, 97.47, 48.74, 9.75, and 0.20 kPa. A piston-type shear device was used to assess the effect of these pressures on cement layer thickness and SBS. The results demonstrated that the highest applied pressure (195.15 kPa) produced the thinnest cement layers (36.60 ± 1.67 μm) and the highest SBS values (58.8 ± 1.6 MPa), whereas the lower applied pressure (0.20 kPa) resulted in the thickest cement layers (73.20 ± 1.64 μm) and significantly lower SBS (30.8 ± 2.0 MPa). Regression analysis confirmed a strong correlation (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.05) between cement thickness and SBS, indicating that cement thickness is a critical factor influencing adhesion. These findings highlight the importance of controlling applied pressure during cementation to optimize bonding performance. Standardizing pressure application through calibrated pressure devices may improve the durability of zirconia-based restorations and minimize variability during the cementation process.

施加压力和厚度变化对3Y-TZP氧化锆与自粘树脂水泥粘结强度的影响
本研究评估了施加压力对3Y-TZP商用氧化锆与自粘树脂水泥之间剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。创建了五个测试组,每个组承受不同的施加压力:195.15、97.47、48.74、9.75和0.20 kPa。采用活塞式剪切装置评估了这些压力对水泥层厚度和SBS的影响。结果表明:在最高施加压力(195.15 kPa)下,水泥层最薄(36.60±1.67 μm), SBS值最高(58.8±1.6 MPa);在较低施加压力(0.20 kPa)下,水泥层最厚(73.20±1.64 μm), SBS值显著降低(30.8±2.0 MPa)。回归分析证实水泥厚度与SBS之间存在较强的相关性(R2 = 0.82, p < 0.05),说明水泥厚度是影响粘附的关键因素。这些发现强调了在胶结过程中控制施加压力以优化胶结性能的重要性。通过校准压力装置标准化压力应用可以提高氧化锆基修复体的耐久性,并最大限度地减少胶结过程中的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信