Study on the variations in acaricide sensitivity between two spider mite species, Amphitetranychus viennensis and Tetranychus urticae, in Chinese orchards

IF 4.2 1区 农林科学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Xueli Wang , Xiangjie Zhao , Hongtao Tu
{"title":"Study on the variations in acaricide sensitivity between two spider mite species, Amphitetranychus viennensis and Tetranychus urticae, in Chinese orchards","authors":"Xueli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiangjie Zhao ,&nbsp;Hongtao Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.pestbp.2025.106367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Amphitetranychus viennensis</em> and <em>Tetranychus urticae</em>, are destructive agricultural and horticultural pests. Their management primarily relies on acaricides; however, little is known about the susceptibility of these two species to these chemicals. The current study assessed the susceptibility of <em>A. viennensis</em> and <em>T. urticae</em> to ten acaricides, investigated the detoxification enzyme activities, and conducted transcriptional analyses after bifenazate and cyetpyrafen exposure. The results showed that the LC<sub>50</sub> values of most acaricides against <em>T. urticae</em> were notably higher than those for <em>A. viennensis</em> at different developmental stages. At the adult stage, <em>A. viennensis</em> was more tolerant to bifenazate than <em>T. urticae,</em> while <em>A. viennensis</em> showed increased sensitivity to cyetpyrafen than <em>T. urticae</em>. After cyetpyrafen exposure, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) activity in <em>T. urticae</em> were markedly higher at 6 and 12 h, whereas that in <em>A. viennensis</em> increased only at 6 h. No notable differences in cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s) levels were found in <em>T. urticae</em> between the control and treatment groups (cyetpyrafen or bifenazate). However, <em>A. viennensis</em> treated with either cyetpyrafen or bifenazate showed a marked decrease in P450 levels at 12 h. Furthermore, more detoxification genes in both species were activated in response to bifenazate or cyetpyrafen. Differential metabolic detoxification mediated by P450 and GST genes may primarily account for the distinct responses of these species to bifenazate and cyetpyrafen. These findings reveal the distinct detoxification capacities of the two species in response to acaricides and highlight the importance of applying species-specific management strategies for these pests.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19828,"journal":{"name":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 106367"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004835752500080X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amphitetranychus viennensis and Tetranychus urticae, are destructive agricultural and horticultural pests. Their management primarily relies on acaricides; however, little is known about the susceptibility of these two species to these chemicals. The current study assessed the susceptibility of A. viennensis and T. urticae to ten acaricides, investigated the detoxification enzyme activities, and conducted transcriptional analyses after bifenazate and cyetpyrafen exposure. The results showed that the LC50 values of most acaricides against T. urticae were notably higher than those for A. viennensis at different developmental stages. At the adult stage, A. viennensis was more tolerant to bifenazate than T. urticae, while A. viennensis showed increased sensitivity to cyetpyrafen than T. urticae. After cyetpyrafen exposure, glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) activity in T. urticae were markedly higher at 6 and 12 h, whereas that in A. viennensis increased only at 6 h. No notable differences in cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s) levels were found in T. urticae between the control and treatment groups (cyetpyrafen or bifenazate). However, A. viennensis treated with either cyetpyrafen or bifenazate showed a marked decrease in P450 levels at 12 h. Furthermore, more detoxification genes in both species were activated in response to bifenazate or cyetpyrafen. Differential metabolic detoxification mediated by P450 and GST genes may primarily account for the distinct responses of these species to bifenazate and cyetpyrafen. These findings reveal the distinct detoxification capacities of the two species in response to acaricides and highlight the importance of applying species-specific management strategies for these pests.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
238
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology publishes original scientific articles pertaining to the mode of action of plant protection agents such as insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, and similar compounds, including nonlethal pest control agents, biosynthesis of pheromones, hormones, and plant resistance agents. Manuscripts may include a biochemical, physiological, or molecular study for an understanding of comparative toxicology or selective toxicity of both target and nontarget organisms. Particular interest will be given to studies on the molecular biology of pest control, toxicology, and pesticide resistance. Research Areas Emphasized Include the Biochemistry and Physiology of: • Comparative toxicity • Mode of action • Pathophysiology • Plant growth regulators • Resistance • Other effects of pesticides on both parasites and hosts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信