Reducing carbon emission at the corporate level: Does artificial intelligence matter?

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yanchao Feng , Yitong Yan , Ke Shi , Zhenhua Zhang
{"title":"Reducing carbon emission at the corporate level: Does artificial intelligence matter?","authors":"Yanchao Feng ,&nbsp;Yitong Yan ,&nbsp;Ke Shi ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As one of the primary objectives of energy transition, carbon emission (CE) reduction is directly related to the preservation of the ecological system as well as the welfare of humanity. However, most countries still face the dilemma of insufficient driving force for technological innovation and environmental inefficiency, resulting in the failure to achieve the emission reduction target as expected. Artificial Intelligence (AI), as a catalyst to promote a fresh cycle involving advances in technology along with industrial revolution, provides novel solutions for CE reduction and attracts the attention of many scholars. However, the impact of AI adoption on enterprise carbon emissions (CEs) has not been fully studied. This study addresses the existing research void by investigating the correlation between AI adoption and CEs of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2021. Using panel fixed-effects regression analysis, it is found that AI adoption has a significant negative impact on CEs, a finding which stays robust after controlling for potential endogeneity issues. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that AI adoption has a more significant CE suppression effect in non-polluting, non-high-tech, and capital-intensive industries. In addition, AI adoption is more effective in suppressing CEs in regions with non-state-owned firms or strict environmental regulations. Mechanism analysis reveal that the increase in CEs is attributed to the increase in R&amp;D expenditures and inputs due to scale expansion and the rebound effect due to efficiency improvement. The decrease in CEs, on the other hand, is attributed to the improvement in managerial and financial capabilities and the facilitation of information sharing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 107911"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001088","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one of the primary objectives of energy transition, carbon emission (CE) reduction is directly related to the preservation of the ecological system as well as the welfare of humanity. However, most countries still face the dilemma of insufficient driving force for technological innovation and environmental inefficiency, resulting in the failure to achieve the emission reduction target as expected. Artificial Intelligence (AI), as a catalyst to promote a fresh cycle involving advances in technology along with industrial revolution, provides novel solutions for CE reduction and attracts the attention of many scholars. However, the impact of AI adoption on enterprise carbon emissions (CEs) has not been fully studied. This study addresses the existing research void by investigating the correlation between AI adoption and CEs of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2021. Using panel fixed-effects regression analysis, it is found that AI adoption has a significant negative impact on CEs, a finding which stays robust after controlling for potential endogeneity issues. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that AI adoption has a more significant CE suppression effect in non-polluting, non-high-tech, and capital-intensive industries. In addition, AI adoption is more effective in suppressing CEs in regions with non-state-owned firms or strict environmental regulations. Mechanism analysis reveal that the increase in CEs is attributed to the increase in R&D expenditures and inputs due to scale expansion and the rebound effect due to efficiency improvement. The decrease in CEs, on the other hand, is attributed to the improvement in managerial and financial capabilities and the facilitation of information sharing.
减少企业层面的碳排放:人工智能重要吗?
碳减排作为能源转型的首要目标之一,直接关系到生态系统的保护和人类的福祉。然而,大多数国家仍然面临着技术创新动力不足和环境效率低下的困境,导致减排目标未能如期实现。人工智能(Artificial Intelligence, AI)作为技术进步和工业革命共同推动新周期的催化剂,为降低碳排放提供了新的解决方案,受到众多学者的关注。然而,采用人工智能对企业碳排放(CEs)的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究通过对2009 - 2021年中国a股上市公司人工智能采用率与企业绩效的相关性进行研究,填补了现有研究的空白。使用面板固定效应回归分析,我们发现人工智能的采用对消费成本有显著的负面影响,这一发现在控制了潜在的内生性问题后保持稳健。异质性分析表明,在非污染、非高科技和资本密集型产业中,人工智能的采用对CE的抑制作用更为显著。此外,在非国有企业或环境法规严格的地区,采用人工智能在抑制消费电子产品方面更为有效。机理分析表明,企业消费支出的增加主要是由于规模扩张导致研发支出和投入增加,以及效率提高带来的反弹效应。另一方面,消费支出的减少是由于管理和财政能力的改善以及信息共享的便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信