A machine learning approach using gait parameters to cluster TKA subjects into stable and unstable joints for discovery analysis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Knee Pub Date : 2025-03-11 DOI:10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.018
Erica M. Ramirez, Kathrin Ebinger , Denis Nam, Christopher Ferrigno, Markus A. Wimmer
{"title":"A machine learning approach using gait parameters to cluster TKA subjects into stable and unstable joints for discovery analysis","authors":"Erica M. Ramirez,&nbsp;Kathrin Ebinger ,&nbsp;Denis Nam,&nbsp;Christopher Ferrigno,&nbsp;Markus A. Wimmer","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.02.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patient-reported joint instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is difficult to quantify objectively. Here, we apply machine learning to cluster TKA subjects using nine literature-proposed gait parameters as knee instability predictors and explore cluster reliability and consistency with self-organizing map (SOM) and k-means computation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Subjects with TKA were retrieved from a data repository, supplemented by TKA patients with self-reported knee instability. Healthy elderly subjects, serving as control group for gait features, were added as well. All subjects have undergone identical gait analysis testing. Gait parameters (in singularity or combination) were used to cluster subjects using SOM and k-means and to identify the best split. Once clustered, comparisons between groups were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From all gait parameter combinations tried across the 91 TKA subjects, dynamic joint stiffness (DJS) was the single parameter that gave high reliability, was reasonably consistent, and singularly clustered all but one of the known unstable subjects. This TKA cluster, which contained 11 presumably unstable subjects, showed higher DJS (0.57) than the cluster containing the remaining TKA subjects (0.23). Interestingly, the latter had a DJS similar to that of the 34 healthy subjects (0.24). Additionally, during swing, the cluster with the presumably unstable subjects exhibited lower antero-posterior motion with a higher-than-normal biceps/rectus femoris activity ratio.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Using machine learning, DJS emerged as the most powerful variable to cluster TKA subjects into presumably stable and unstable groups based on gait. Future hypothesis driven, prospective research has to verify the observations made in this retrospective discovery work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"54 ","pages":"Pages 167-177"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025000328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported joint instability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is difficult to quantify objectively. Here, we apply machine learning to cluster TKA subjects using nine literature-proposed gait parameters as knee instability predictors and explore cluster reliability and consistency with self-organizing map (SOM) and k-means computation.

Methods

Subjects with TKA were retrieved from a data repository, supplemented by TKA patients with self-reported knee instability. Healthy elderly subjects, serving as control group for gait features, were added as well. All subjects have undergone identical gait analysis testing. Gait parameters (in singularity or combination) were used to cluster subjects using SOM and k-means and to identify the best split. Once clustered, comparisons between groups were performed.

Results

From all gait parameter combinations tried across the 91 TKA subjects, dynamic joint stiffness (DJS) was the single parameter that gave high reliability, was reasonably consistent, and singularly clustered all but one of the known unstable subjects. This TKA cluster, which contained 11 presumably unstable subjects, showed higher DJS (0.57) than the cluster containing the remaining TKA subjects (0.23). Interestingly, the latter had a DJS similar to that of the 34 healthy subjects (0.24). Additionally, during swing, the cluster with the presumably unstable subjects exhibited lower antero-posterior motion with a higher-than-normal biceps/rectus femoris activity ratio.

Conclusion

Using machine learning, DJS emerged as the most powerful variable to cluster TKA subjects into presumably stable and unstable groups based on gait. Future hypothesis driven, prospective research has to verify the observations made in this retrospective discovery work.
一种使用步态参数将TKA受试者聚类为稳定和不稳定关节进行发现分析的机器学习方法
背景:全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者报告的关节不稳定性很难客观量化。在这里,我们使用9个文献提出的步态参数作为膝关节不稳定性预测因子,将机器学习应用于TKA受试者的聚类,并通过自组织图(SOM)和k-means计算探索聚类的可靠性和一致性。方法从数据库中检索TKA患者,并辅以自述膝关节不稳的TKA患者。同时加入健康老年受试者作为步态特征的对照组。所有受试者都进行了相同的步态分析测试。步态参数(单个或组合)使用SOM和k-means对受试者进行聚类,并确定最佳分割。分组后,进行组间比较。结果在91名TKA受试者中尝试的所有步态参数组合中,动态关节刚度(DJS)是提供高可靠性的单一参数,具有合理的一致性,并且除了一个已知的不稳定受试者外,其他所有受试者都具有奇异聚类。这个包含11个可能不稳定受试者的TKA集群显示出更高的DJS(0.57),比包含其余TKA受试者的集群(0.23)高。有趣的是,后者的dj与34名健康受试者相似(0.24)。此外,在摆动过程中,可能不稳定的受试者群表现出较低的前后运动,肱二头肌/股直肌活动比高于正常水平。通过机器学习,DJS成为根据步态将TKA受试者分为稳定组和不稳定组的最有效变量。未来的假设驱动,前瞻性研究必须验证在这项回顾性发现工作中所做的观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Knee
Knee 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee. The topics covered include, but are not limited to: • Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry; • Biomechanical studies; • Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices; • Imaging and diagnostic techniques; • Pathology; • Trauma; • Surgery; • Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信