Overcoming vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alessandro Del Ponte , Audrey De Dominicis , Paolo Canofari
{"title":"Overcoming vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Alessandro Del Ponte ,&nbsp;Audrey De Dominicis ,&nbsp;Paolo Canofari","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2025.100996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Here we investigate whether releasing COVID-19 vaccines at open-day events boosted Italy's vaccination campaign in 2021. This strategy exploits insights from psychology.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We built an original dataset covering 200 days of vaccination data in Italy, including “open day” events. Open-day events (in short: open days) are instances where COVID-19 vaccines were released only for a specific day at a specified location (usually, a large pavilion or a public building). Importantly, releasing vaccines through open days instead of the usual appointment channel leaves the supply of vaccines unaltered. Our dependent variables are the number of total and first doses administered in proportion to the eligible population. Our key independent variable is the presence of open-day events in a given region on a specific day.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed the data using regression with fixed effects for time and region. The analysis was robust to alternative model specifications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We find that when an open day event was organized, in proportion to the eligible population, there was an average 0.39–0.44 percentage point increase in total doses administered and a 0.30–0.33 percentage point increase in first doses administered. These figures correspond to an average increase of 10,455–11,796 in total doses administered and 8,043–8,847 in the first doses administered.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Releasing vaccines by organizing open-day events was associated with an increase in COVID-19 vaccinations in most Italian regions. These results call for further study of the effectiveness of open days to increase vaccinations and protect against other infectious diseases or future pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"14 3","pages":"Article 100996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883725000243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Here we investigate whether releasing COVID-19 vaccines at open-day events boosted Italy's vaccination campaign in 2021. This strategy exploits insights from psychology.

Study design

We built an original dataset covering 200 days of vaccination data in Italy, including “open day” events. Open-day events (in short: open days) are instances where COVID-19 vaccines were released only for a specific day at a specified location (usually, a large pavilion or a public building). Importantly, releasing vaccines through open days instead of the usual appointment channel leaves the supply of vaccines unaltered. Our dependent variables are the number of total and first doses administered in proportion to the eligible population. Our key independent variable is the presence of open-day events in a given region on a specific day.

Methods

We analyzed the data using regression with fixed effects for time and region. The analysis was robust to alternative model specifications.

Results

We find that when an open day event was organized, in proportion to the eligible population, there was an average 0.39–0.44 percentage point increase in total doses administered and a 0.30–0.33 percentage point increase in first doses administered. These figures correspond to an average increase of 10,455–11,796 in total doses administered and 8,043–8,847 in the first doses administered.

Conclusions

Releasing vaccines by organizing open-day events was associated with an increase in COVID-19 vaccinations in most Italian regions. These results call for further study of the effectiveness of open days to increase vaccinations and protect against other infectious diseases or future pandemics.
克服疫苗犹豫不决:COVID-19 大流行期间来自意大利的证据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信