A combined vehicle specific power and laboratory emissions approach to real driving CO2 emission estimation for light-duty vehicle

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Dan Tan , Jianwei Tan , Ming Liu , Hualong Xu , Yunshan Ge
{"title":"A combined vehicle specific power and laboratory emissions approach to real driving CO2 emission estimation for light-duty vehicle","authors":"Dan Tan ,&nbsp;Jianwei Tan ,&nbsp;Ming Liu ,&nbsp;Hualong Xu ,&nbsp;Yunshan Ge","doi":"10.1016/j.seta.2025.104265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The influence of CO<sub>2</sub> on Earth’s climate warming is significant. To quantitatively evaluate RDE (Real Driving Emission) CO<sub>2</sub> emissions based on laboratory test cycles, ten China 6 light-duty vehicles were tested under the WLTC (Worldwide Light-duty Driving Test Cycle), CLTC-P (China Light-duty Vehicle Test Cycle), and RDE tests. This study identified that the reference CO<sub>2</sub> emission factors for conventional vehicles and PHEVs (Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles) were 9.59–27.36 % and 32.30–45.01 % higher than the tested CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, respectively. This suggested that setting CO<sub>2</sub> emission limits based on the method in fuel consumption regulation could not effectively reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, particularly for PHEVs. The linear relationship between laboratory and RDE average CO<sub>2</sub> emission in each VSP (Vehicle Specific Power) Bin suggested that the RDE average CO<sub>2</sub> emission can be corrected to reduce the impact of driving behaviour and traffic conditions. The laboratory-based RDE emissions were obtained by replacing the frequency ratios of each VSP bin in the RDE tests with those from the laboratory cycles, and this method was helpful to establish RDE CO<sub>2</sub> emission limits. For PHEVs, when the WLTC was used as a benchmark, RDE CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from aggressive driving and traffic congestion were 9.48–14.87 g/km and 20.04–20.31 g/km, respectively. These emissions were 5.49 g/km and 20.52 g/km when the CLTC-P was used as the benchmark.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56019,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 104265"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213138825000967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The influence of CO2 on Earth’s climate warming is significant. To quantitatively evaluate RDE (Real Driving Emission) CO2 emissions based on laboratory test cycles, ten China 6 light-duty vehicles were tested under the WLTC (Worldwide Light-duty Driving Test Cycle), CLTC-P (China Light-duty Vehicle Test Cycle), and RDE tests. This study identified that the reference CO2 emission factors for conventional vehicles and PHEVs (Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles) were 9.59–27.36 % and 32.30–45.01 % higher than the tested CO2 emissions, respectively. This suggested that setting CO2 emission limits based on the method in fuel consumption regulation could not effectively reduce CO2 emissions, particularly for PHEVs. The linear relationship between laboratory and RDE average CO2 emission in each VSP (Vehicle Specific Power) Bin suggested that the RDE average CO2 emission can be corrected to reduce the impact of driving behaviour and traffic conditions. The laboratory-based RDE emissions were obtained by replacing the frequency ratios of each VSP bin in the RDE tests with those from the laboratory cycles, and this method was helpful to establish RDE CO2 emission limits. For PHEVs, when the WLTC was used as a benchmark, RDE CO2 emissions from aggressive driving and traffic congestion were 9.48–14.87 g/km and 20.04–20.31 g/km, respectively. These emissions were 5.49 g/km and 20.52 g/km when the CLTC-P was used as the benchmark.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1091
期刊介绍: Encouraging a transition to a sustainable energy future is imperative for our world. Technologies that enable this shift in various sectors like transportation, heating, and power systems are of utmost importance. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments welcomes papers focusing on a range of aspects and levels of technological advancements in energy generation and utilization. The aim is to reduce the negative environmental impact associated with energy production and consumption, spanning from laboratory experiments to real-world applications in the commercial sector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信