US economy-wide decarbonization: Sectoral and distributional impacts

IF 5.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Jonathon Becker , Maxwell Brown , Morgan Browning , Yongxia Cai , Daden Goldfinger , James McFarland , Sergey Paltsev , Shane Weisberg , Mei Yuan
{"title":"US economy-wide decarbonization: Sectoral and distributional impacts","authors":"Jonathon Becker ,&nbsp;Maxwell Brown ,&nbsp;Morgan Browning ,&nbsp;Yongxia Cai ,&nbsp;Daden Goldfinger ,&nbsp;James McFarland ,&nbsp;Sergey Paltsev ,&nbsp;Shane Weisberg ,&nbsp;Mei Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the sectoral and distributional welfare impacts of reaching net-zero CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the US by 2050. We simulate several net-zero projections using a CGE model linked with an electricity capacity expansion model to try to understand what a transition to net-zero might look like and the role played by different policies and technologies. Reaching net-zero leads to high carbon prices in 2045 and 2050, which drives deployment of direct air capture (DAC) technology. The electricity sector reaches negative emissions by 2050. Electrification is the predominant means for decarbonizing the buildings and transportation sectors, whereas industrial sectors are assumed to have limited electrification potential and prefer carbon management. The negative emissions in the power sector are primarily achieved through biomass-fired electricity generation with carbon capture and storage. In our scenarios, decarbonization is progressive (i.e., burden increases with income) due to our modeling assumption of lump-sum recycling of carbon permit revenues. In 2050, we find a break in the progressive trend when capital-intensive DAC technology enters, as permit revenue distributions that benefit the lowest income groups are directly substituted for returns to capital from DAC deployment that benefit the highest income groups. Our other non-CCS and non-DAC technology improvement cases in the buildings, transportation, and industrial sectors led to a more evenly distributed benefit across households as these mitigation channels are less capital intensive. When the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is included, the net-zero emissions limit does not bind as early, the need for DAC is reduced, and industrial CCS investment occurs earlier and in greater amounts. These effects highlight the importance of considering interactions between technologies, policies, and fiscal decisions when prescribing net-zero pathways around a distributional goal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100181"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266627872500008X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the sectoral and distributional welfare impacts of reaching net-zero CO2 emissions in the US by 2050. We simulate several net-zero projections using a CGE model linked with an electricity capacity expansion model to try to understand what a transition to net-zero might look like and the role played by different policies and technologies. Reaching net-zero leads to high carbon prices in 2045 and 2050, which drives deployment of direct air capture (DAC) technology. The electricity sector reaches negative emissions by 2050. Electrification is the predominant means for decarbonizing the buildings and transportation sectors, whereas industrial sectors are assumed to have limited electrification potential and prefer carbon management. The negative emissions in the power sector are primarily achieved through biomass-fired electricity generation with carbon capture and storage. In our scenarios, decarbonization is progressive (i.e., burden increases with income) due to our modeling assumption of lump-sum recycling of carbon permit revenues. In 2050, we find a break in the progressive trend when capital-intensive DAC technology enters, as permit revenue distributions that benefit the lowest income groups are directly substituted for returns to capital from DAC deployment that benefit the highest income groups. Our other non-CCS and non-DAC technology improvement cases in the buildings, transportation, and industrial sectors led to a more evenly distributed benefit across households as these mitigation channels are less capital intensive. When the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is included, the net-zero emissions limit does not bind as early, the need for DAC is reduced, and industrial CCS investment occurs earlier and in greater amounts. These effects highlight the importance of considering interactions between technologies, policies, and fiscal decisions when prescribing net-zero pathways around a distributional goal.
美国经济整体脱碳:部门和分配影响
本文研究了到2050年美国实现二氧化碳净零排放对部门和分配福利的影响。我们使用与电力容量扩张模型相关联的CGE模型模拟了几个净零预测,试图了解向净零的过渡可能是什么样子,以及不同政策和技术所起的作用。达到净零排放将导致2045年和2050年的高碳价格,这将推动直接空气捕获(DAC)技术的部署。到2050年,电力部门达到负排放。电气化是建筑和运输部门脱碳的主要手段,而工业部门被认为电气化潜力有限,更喜欢碳管理。电力部门的负排放主要是通过生物质发电和碳捕获和储存来实现的。在我们的情景中,由于我们的建模假设碳许可收入的一次性回收,脱碳是渐进的(即负担随着收入的增加而增加)。在2050年,当资本密集型DAC技术进入时,我们发现进步趋势出现了突破,因为允许使最低收入群体受益的收入分配直接取代了使最高收入群体受益的DAC部署的资本回报。我们在建筑、交通和工业领域的其他非ccs和非dac技术改进案例,由于这些缓解渠道的资本密集程度较低,因此在家庭之间的利益分配更为均匀。当通货膨胀减少法案(IRA)包括在内时,净零排放限制不那么早具有约束力,对DAC的需求减少,工业CCS投资发生得更早,数量也更大。这些影响突出了在围绕分配目标制定净零排放途径时,考虑技术、政策和财政决策之间相互作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信