Experimental and numerical investigation on hyperelastic sealing disc contact behavior in pipeline, a comparison between fluid-driven and pull-through approaches

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Salar Jouzani, Mohammad Hossein Soorgee
{"title":"Experimental and numerical investigation on hyperelastic sealing disc contact behavior in pipeline, a comparison between fluid-driven and pull-through approaches","authors":"Salar Jouzani,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Soorgee","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2024.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pipelines are widely recognized as the safest and most efficient means of fluid transportation. Pipeline pigging, a secure and reliabl<u>e</u> technique, is employed for both cleaning and sealing pipelines to optimize efficiency. Since pigging operation requires differential pressure (<span><math><mrow><mrow><mstyle><mi>Δ</mi></mstyle></mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math></span>) to facilitate pig movement, this pressure must correspond to the pipeline’s operational conditions. Consequently, studying the required <span><math><mrow><mrow><mstyle><mi>Δ</mi></mstyle></mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math></span> for sealing discs, which serve as primary sealing elements of pigs, is crucial. The primary focus of this study is to examine the difference between pulling the pig using a cable and propelling it with fluid. Furthermore, the main novelty of this research is to experimentally investigate a single sealing disc and conduct fluid-driven tests on it. To study more precisely, three sealing discs with various thicknesses and the same hardness have been launched into a 6-inch spool test, containing five pipes with different wall thicknesses, resulting in multiple oversize ratios (%Osz). In the experimental study, both fluid-driven and pull-through tests were conducted. The range of discrepancy between two methods varies from 15% to 26% for different oversize ratios which is considerable. Additionally, A 2-D axisymmetric nonlinear numerical simulation was conducted in a finite element software ABAQUS in order to study the behavior of sealing discs. Using a pressure-dependent friction coefficient with the proper hyperelastic model was key to achieving simulations that have good agreements with experimental results, with discrepancy of less than 10% in all extracted pressures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143324000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pipelines are widely recognized as the safest and most efficient means of fluid transportation. Pipeline pigging, a secure and reliable technique, is employed for both cleaning and sealing pipelines to optimize efficiency. Since pigging operation requires differential pressure (Δp) to facilitate pig movement, this pressure must correspond to the pipeline’s operational conditions. Consequently, studying the required Δp for sealing discs, which serve as primary sealing elements of pigs, is crucial. The primary focus of this study is to examine the difference between pulling the pig using a cable and propelling it with fluid. Furthermore, the main novelty of this research is to experimentally investigate a single sealing disc and conduct fluid-driven tests on it. To study more precisely, three sealing discs with various thicknesses and the same hardness have been launched into a 6-inch spool test, containing five pipes with different wall thicknesses, resulting in multiple oversize ratios (%Osz). In the experimental study, both fluid-driven and pull-through tests were conducted. The range of discrepancy between two methods varies from 15% to 26% for different oversize ratios which is considerable. Additionally, A 2-D axisymmetric nonlinear numerical simulation was conducted in a finite element software ABAQUS in order to study the behavior of sealing discs. Using a pressure-dependent friction coefficient with the proper hyperelastic model was key to achieving simulations that have good agreements with experimental results, with discrepancy of less than 10% in all extracted pressures.
管道中超弹性密封盘接触特性的实验与数值研究,流体驱动与拉通方法的比较
管道被广泛认为是最安全、最有效的流体运输方式。管道清管是一种安全可靠的清洁和密封管道的技术,可以优化管道的效率。由于清管作业需要压差(Δp)来促进清管器的运动,因此该压力必须与管道的运行条件相对应。因此,研究作为猪的主要密封元件的密封阀瓣所需的Δp是至关重要的。本研究的主要重点是检查使用电缆牵引清管器和使用液体推动清管器的区别。此外,本研究的主要新颖之处在于对单个密封盘进行了实验研究,并对其进行了流体驱动试验。为了进行更精确的研究,我们将三个不同厚度和相同硬度的密封盘放入6英寸的阀芯测试中,其中包含五根不同壁厚的管道,结果产生了多个超大比(%Osz)。在实验研究中,进行了流体驱动和拉过试验。对于不同的超大比例,两种方法之间的差异范围从15%到26%不等,这是相当可观的。另外,在ABAQUS有限元软件中对密封盘进行了二维轴对称非线性数值模拟研究。使用压力相关摩擦系数和适当的超弹性模型是实现与实验结果良好一致的模拟的关键,所有提取的压力差异小于10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信