Experimental and numerical investigation on hyperelastic sealing disc contact behavior in pipeline, a comparison between fluid-driven and pull-through approaches

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Salar Jouzani, Mohammad Hossein Soorgee
{"title":"Experimental and numerical investigation on hyperelastic sealing disc contact behavior in pipeline, a comparison between fluid-driven and pull-through approaches","authors":"Salar Jouzani,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Soorgee","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2024.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pipelines are widely recognized as the safest and most efficient means of fluid transportation. Pipeline pigging, a secure and reliabl<u>e</u> technique, is employed for both cleaning and sealing pipelines to optimize efficiency. Since pigging operation requires differential pressure (<span><math><mrow><mrow><mstyle><mi>Δ</mi></mstyle></mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math></span>) to facilitate pig movement, this pressure must correspond to the pipeline’s operational conditions. Consequently, studying the required <span><math><mrow><mrow><mstyle><mi>Δ</mi></mstyle></mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow></math></span> for sealing discs, which serve as primary sealing elements of pigs, is crucial. The primary focus of this study is to examine the difference between pulling the pig using a cable and propelling it with fluid. Furthermore, the main novelty of this research is to experimentally investigate a single sealing disc and conduct fluid-driven tests on it. To study more precisely, three sealing discs with various thicknesses and the same hardness have been launched into a 6-inch spool test, containing five pipes with different wall thicknesses, resulting in multiple oversize ratios (%Osz). In the experimental study, both fluid-driven and pull-through tests were conducted. The range of discrepancy between two methods varies from 15% to 26% for different oversize ratios which is considerable. Additionally, A 2-D axisymmetric nonlinear numerical simulation was conducted in a finite element software ABAQUS in order to study the behavior of sealing discs. Using a pressure-dependent friction coefficient with the proper hyperelastic model was key to achieving simulations that have good agreements with experimental results, with discrepancy of less than 10% in all extracted pressures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143324000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pipelines are widely recognized as the safest and most efficient means of fluid transportation. Pipeline pigging, a secure and reliable technique, is employed for both cleaning and sealing pipelines to optimize efficiency. Since pigging operation requires differential pressure (Δp) to facilitate pig movement, this pressure must correspond to the pipeline’s operational conditions. Consequently, studying the required Δp for sealing discs, which serve as primary sealing elements of pigs, is crucial. The primary focus of this study is to examine the difference between pulling the pig using a cable and propelling it with fluid. Furthermore, the main novelty of this research is to experimentally investigate a single sealing disc and conduct fluid-driven tests on it. To study more precisely, three sealing discs with various thicknesses and the same hardness have been launched into a 6-inch spool test, containing five pipes with different wall thicknesses, resulting in multiple oversize ratios (%Osz). In the experimental study, both fluid-driven and pull-through tests were conducted. The range of discrepancy between two methods varies from 15% to 26% for different oversize ratios which is considerable. Additionally, A 2-D axisymmetric nonlinear numerical simulation was conducted in a finite element software ABAQUS in order to study the behavior of sealing discs. Using a pressure-dependent friction coefficient with the proper hyperelastic model was key to achieving simulations that have good agreements with experimental results, with discrepancy of less than 10% in all extracted pressures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信