Zineb Garroussi , Antoine Legrain , Sébastien Gambs , Vincent Gautrais , Brunilde Sansò
{"title":"A systematic review of data privacy in Mobility as a Service (MaaS)","authors":"Zineb Garroussi , Antoine Legrain , Sébastien Gambs , Vincent Gautrais , Brunilde Sansò","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mobility as a Service (MaaS) integrates various transportation modes to offer seamless urban mobility solutions. However, the extensive collection and sharing of user data on MaaS platforms pose significant privacy challenges. This systematic review identifies key data privacy concerns, evaluates current privacy-preserving technologies, and explores the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring user privacy in MaaS systems. Using the PRISMA framework, a comprehensive literature search across Web of Science, Elsevier, and IEEE Xplore databases resulted in the selection of 32 studies for detailed analysis.</div><div>The review is structured around three main themes: (1) Privacy-Preserving Techniques, including anonymization strategies (k-anonymity, differential privacy, obfuscation), encryption methods (blockchain, cryptographic protocols), federated learning for decentralized data processing, and advanced algorithms for optimizing privacy budgets and balancing utility-privacy trade-offs; (2) User Trust and Privacy Perceptions, highlighting that trust in service providers is essential for MaaS adoption, privacy concerns may impact adoption but do not necessarily prevent it (the “privacy paradox”), and awareness of data misuse affects user trust and willingness to adopt MaaS; and (3) Regulatory Frameworks, focusing on the importance of GDPR compliance to ensure strict data protection through consent and transparency, and embedding privacy-by-design principles within MaaS architectures to safeguard user data from the outset.</div><div>This review emphasizes the need for a holistic approach, integrating technological innovation, user-centered design, and strong regulatory oversight to effectively address privacy challenges in MaaS. Future research should focus on developing scalable privacy frameworks that protect user data without compromising operational efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101254"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224002409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) integrates various transportation modes to offer seamless urban mobility solutions. However, the extensive collection and sharing of user data on MaaS platforms pose significant privacy challenges. This systematic review identifies key data privacy concerns, evaluates current privacy-preserving technologies, and explores the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring user privacy in MaaS systems. Using the PRISMA framework, a comprehensive literature search across Web of Science, Elsevier, and IEEE Xplore databases resulted in the selection of 32 studies for detailed analysis.
The review is structured around three main themes: (1) Privacy-Preserving Techniques, including anonymization strategies (k-anonymity, differential privacy, obfuscation), encryption methods (blockchain, cryptographic protocols), federated learning for decentralized data processing, and advanced algorithms for optimizing privacy budgets and balancing utility-privacy trade-offs; (2) User Trust and Privacy Perceptions, highlighting that trust in service providers is essential for MaaS adoption, privacy concerns may impact adoption but do not necessarily prevent it (the “privacy paradox”), and awareness of data misuse affects user trust and willingness to adopt MaaS; and (3) Regulatory Frameworks, focusing on the importance of GDPR compliance to ensure strict data protection through consent and transparency, and embedding privacy-by-design principles within MaaS architectures to safeguard user data from the outset.
This review emphasizes the need for a holistic approach, integrating technological innovation, user-centered design, and strong regulatory oversight to effectively address privacy challenges in MaaS. Future research should focus on developing scalable privacy frameworks that protect user data without compromising operational efficiency.
移动即服务(MaaS)集成了各种交通方式,提供无缝的城市移动解决方案。然而,在MaaS平台上广泛收集和共享用户数据构成了重大的隐私挑战。本系统综述确定了关键的数据隐私问题,评估了当前的隐私保护技术,并探讨了监管框架在确保MaaS系统中用户隐私方面的作用。使用PRISMA框架,在Web of Science、Elsevier和IEEE explore数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,结果选择了32项研究进行详细分析。该综述围绕三个主题进行:(1)隐私保护技术,包括匿名化策略(k-匿名、差分隐私、混淆)、加密方法(区块链、加密协议)、用于分散数据处理的联邦学习,以及用于优化隐私预算和平衡效用-隐私权衡的高级算法;(2)用户信任和隐私感知,强调对服务提供商的信任对于采用MaaS至关重要,隐私问题可能会影响采用,但不一定会阻止采用(“隐私悖论”),对数据滥用的认识影响用户信任和采用MaaS的意愿;(3)监管框架,重点关注GDPR合规性的重要性,通过同意和透明度确保严格的数据保护,并在MaaS架构中嵌入隐私设计原则,从一开始就保护用户数据。本综述强调需要采用整体方法,整合技术创新、以用户为中心的设计和强有力的监管监督,以有效解决MaaS中的隐私挑战。未来的研究应侧重于开发可扩展的隐私框架,在不影响操作效率的情况下保护用户数据。