Estimation of inlet flow rate in simulations of left atrial flows: A proposed optimized and reference-based algorithm with application to sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Henrik Aasen Kjeldsberg , Renate B. Schnabel , Joakim Sundnes , Kristian Valen-Sendstad
{"title":"Estimation of inlet flow rate in simulations of left atrial flows: A proposed optimized and reference-based algorithm with application to sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation","authors":"Henrik Aasen Kjeldsberg ,&nbsp;Renate B. Schnabel ,&nbsp;Joakim Sundnes ,&nbsp;Kristian Valen-Sendstad","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medical image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a valuable tool for studying cardiovascular hemodynamics and its role in vascular pathologies. However, patient-specific flow rate measurements are rare. As a remedy, individual flow rates are typically estimated using anatomical features. In this study, we considered left atrial (LA) flow and compared three commonly used models to two proposed models based on mitral valve orifice area or atrial volume. We optimized our two models against the mean and standard deviation (SD) for heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and peak velocities (E-wave, S-wave) using reference values from healthy individuals. All five models were evaluated on a cohort (<span><math><mrow><mi>N</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>39</mn></mrow></math></span>), and the total error, calculated as the sum of the mean and SD, ranged from 37% to 71% for the commonly used models, while our proposed models achieved errors of 21.7% and 16.1%. For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), we adapted our two models by removing the A-wave and minimizing relative differences in CO, E-wave velocity, and HR compared to normal sinus rhythm. The adapted models for AF showed errors of 1.3% and 1.1% when compared to the relative changes observed between AF and sinus rhythm patients. In conclusion, flow rates are one of the most sensitive yet influential parameters in cardiovascular simulations and can be standardized to improve model robustness. While fully patient-specific flow rate models are challenging to achieve, reducing variability against clinical measurements is a practical approach towards a plausible LA flow model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 112594"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025001058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a valuable tool for studying cardiovascular hemodynamics and its role in vascular pathologies. However, patient-specific flow rate measurements are rare. As a remedy, individual flow rates are typically estimated using anatomical features. In this study, we considered left atrial (LA) flow and compared three commonly used models to two proposed models based on mitral valve orifice area or atrial volume. We optimized our two models against the mean and standard deviation (SD) for heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and peak velocities (E-wave, S-wave) using reference values from healthy individuals. All five models were evaluated on a cohort (N=39), and the total error, calculated as the sum of the mean and SD, ranged from 37% to 71% for the commonly used models, while our proposed models achieved errors of 21.7% and 16.1%. For patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), we adapted our two models by removing the A-wave and minimizing relative differences in CO, E-wave velocity, and HR compared to normal sinus rhythm. The adapted models for AF showed errors of 1.3% and 1.1% when compared to the relative changes observed between AF and sinus rhythm patients. In conclusion, flow rates are one of the most sensitive yet influential parameters in cardiovascular simulations and can be standardized to improve model robustness. While fully patient-specific flow rate models are challenging to achieve, reducing variability against clinical measurements is a practical approach towards a plausible LA flow model.
左房血流模拟中入口流速的估计:一种基于参考的优化算法,应用于窦性心律和心房颤动
基于医学图像的计算流体动力学(CFD)是研究心血管血流动力学及其在血管病理中的作用的重要工具。然而,针对患者的流量测量是罕见的。作为补救措施,通常使用解剖特征来估计个体流量。在本研究中,我们考虑了左心房血流,并将三种常用模型与两种基于二尖瓣口面积或心房容积的模型进行了比较。我们利用健康个体的参考值,针对心率(HR)、心输出量(CO)和峰值速度(e波、s波)的平均值和标准差(SD)对这两个模型进行了优化。在一个队列(N=39)中对这五种模型进行了评估,常用模型的总误差为平均值和标准差的总和,误差范围为37%至71%,而我们提出的模型的误差为21.7%和16.1%。对于心房颤动(AF)患者,我们通过去除a波和最小化CO、e波速度和HR与正常窦性心律的相对差异来调整我们的两个模型。与在房颤和窦性心律患者之间观察到的相对变化相比,调整后的房颤模型的误差分别为1.3%和1.1%。综上所述,流量是心血管模拟中最敏感但影响最大的参数之一,可以标准化以提高模型的鲁棒性。虽然实现完全针对患者的流量模型具有挑战性,但减少临床测量的可变性是实现合理的LA流量模型的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomechanics
Journal of biomechanics 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership. Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to: -Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells. -Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions. -Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response. -Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing. -Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine. -Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction. -Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules. -Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints. -Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics. -Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信