Transfer of workplace e-learning: A systematic literature review

Aidan O'Neill
{"title":"Transfer of workplace e-learning: A systematic literature review","authors":"Aidan O'Neill","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The paper describes a systematic review of literature published between January 2000 and October 2024 dealing with transfer of workplace e-learning. The review focused on theoretical frameworks, types of transfer being studied, and the types of transfer measurements employed to identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest directions for future research.</div><div>Following a discussion of transfer of training, the paper discusses how e-learning differs from traditional face-to-face training. The factors differentiating workplace learning from learning in institutes of education are also explored, thereby establishing workplace e-learning, and its transfer, as a distinct area of study.</div><div>The paper describes the search and filtering methodology used to identify relevant literature. The final corpus of thirty-one documents was studied to classify the type of transfer discussed in each document using six binary sub-categories of near and far transfer. In addition, transfer measurements were classified as self-reports, third-party reports, or objective measurements, and theoretical frameworks were recorded when the information was available. The information was examined to assess whether researchers used similar methodologies in approaching the topic of transfer of workplace e-learning.</div><div>The results of the study show that there is not yet a broadly agreed approach for conducting research into transfer of workplace e-learning. There is no common scale or methodology used to describe and classify transfer, and the most common approach to measuring transfer is self-reports, which are subject to bias. These factors point to a need for further research to develop a robust academic framework for the subject, ideally supported by empirical research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101407"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125001342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper describes a systematic review of literature published between January 2000 and October 2024 dealing with transfer of workplace e-learning. The review focused on theoretical frameworks, types of transfer being studied, and the types of transfer measurements employed to identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest directions for future research.
Following a discussion of transfer of training, the paper discusses how e-learning differs from traditional face-to-face training. The factors differentiating workplace learning from learning in institutes of education are also explored, thereby establishing workplace e-learning, and its transfer, as a distinct area of study.
The paper describes the search and filtering methodology used to identify relevant literature. The final corpus of thirty-one documents was studied to classify the type of transfer discussed in each document using six binary sub-categories of near and far transfer. In addition, transfer measurements were classified as self-reports, third-party reports, or objective measurements, and theoretical frameworks were recorded when the information was available. The information was examined to assess whether researchers used similar methodologies in approaching the topic of transfer of workplace e-learning.
The results of the study show that there is not yet a broadly agreed approach for conducting research into transfer of workplace e-learning. There is no common scale or methodology used to describe and classify transfer, and the most common approach to measuring transfer is self-reports, which are subject to bias. These factors point to a need for further research to develop a robust academic framework for the subject, ideally supported by empirical research.
工作场所电子学习的迁移:系统文献综述
本文对2000年1月至2024年10月期间发表的有关工作场所电子学习迁移的文献进行了系统回顾。综述的重点是理论框架,正在研究的迁移类型,以及用于识别当前知识差距和建议未来研究方向的迁移测量类型。在讨论培训转移之后,本文讨论了电子学习与传统面对面培训的区别。本文还探讨了区分工作场所学习与教育机构学习的因素,从而将工作场所电子学习及其转移作为一个独特的研究领域。本文描述了用于识别相关文献的搜索和过滤方法。对31篇文献的最终语料库进行了研究,使用近迁移和远迁移六个二元子类别对每个文献中讨论的迁移类型进行了分类。此外,转移测量被分类为自我报告、第三方报告或客观测量,并在信息可用时记录理论框架。对这些信息进行了检查,以评估研究人员是否使用了类似的方法来处理工作场所电子学习迁移的主题。研究结果表明,目前还没有一个被广泛认同的方法来进行职场电子学习迁移的研究。没有通用的量表或方法来描述和分类迁移,最常用的测量迁移的方法是自我报告,这是有偏见的。这些因素表明,需要进一步研究,为这一学科建立一个健全的学术框架,最好得到实证研究的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信