The effect of experimentally induced gluteal muscle weakness on joint kinematics, reaction forces, and dynamic balance performance during stair climbing
Dimitris Dimitriou , Michel Meisterhans , Wolf-Wettstein Jessica , Marina Geissmann , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Jonas Widmer , Paul Borbas , Armando Hoch , Patrick O. Zingg
{"title":"The effect of experimentally induced gluteal muscle weakness on joint kinematics, reaction forces, and dynamic balance performance during stair climbing","authors":"Dimitris Dimitriou , Michel Meisterhans , Wolf-Wettstein Jessica , Marina Geissmann , Marie-Rosa Fasser , Jonas Widmer , Paul Borbas , Armando Hoch , Patrick O. Zingg","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2025.106477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of an experimentally induced weakness of the gluteal muscles on joint kinematics, reactions forces, and dynamic balance performance using the center of mass during stair climbing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten healthy adult volunteers received sequential blocks of superior gluteal nerve to tensor fascia lata, superior, and inferior gluteal nerve on their dominant right leg. A full-body movement analysis during stair climbing was performed. A two-way repeated measured analysis of variances were applied to compare the average rotational kinematics, joint reaction forces and center of mass.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Following superior gluteal nerve block, 50 % of healthy participants couldn't complete the task. In participants who completed the task, their joint kinematics were significantly different compared to the control condition, demonstrating more hip flexion (average maximum difference at 50 %: 15 ± 14°, <em>p</em> < 0.05) and more internal rotation (average maximum difference at 20 %: 8 ± 5°, p < 0.05) than in the control condition. Significantly lower joint reaction forces were observed following superior und inferior gluteus nerve blocks at the hip compared to the control condition (up 110 % of body weight average maximum difference, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Participants demonstrated also an increased displacement of their center of mass in the mediolateral direction during both stair-ascent and descent under the superior and inferior gluteal nerve block.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>A weakness in the hip abductors severely affected stair climbing performance. Those who managed to complete the task demonstrated abnormal kinematics, reduced joint reaction forces, and poorer dynamic balance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 106477"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800332500049X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of an experimentally induced weakness of the gluteal muscles on joint kinematics, reactions forces, and dynamic balance performance using the center of mass during stair climbing.
Methods
Ten healthy adult volunteers received sequential blocks of superior gluteal nerve to tensor fascia lata, superior, and inferior gluteal nerve on their dominant right leg. A full-body movement analysis during stair climbing was performed. A two-way repeated measured analysis of variances were applied to compare the average rotational kinematics, joint reaction forces and center of mass.
Findings
Following superior gluteal nerve block, 50 % of healthy participants couldn't complete the task. In participants who completed the task, their joint kinematics were significantly different compared to the control condition, demonstrating more hip flexion (average maximum difference at 50 %: 15 ± 14°, p < 0.05) and more internal rotation (average maximum difference at 20 %: 8 ± 5°, p < 0.05) than in the control condition. Significantly lower joint reaction forces were observed following superior und inferior gluteus nerve blocks at the hip compared to the control condition (up 110 % of body weight average maximum difference, p < 0.05). Participants demonstrated also an increased displacement of their center of mass in the mediolateral direction during both stair-ascent and descent under the superior and inferior gluteal nerve block.
Interpretation
A weakness in the hip abductors severely affected stair climbing performance. Those who managed to complete the task demonstrated abnormal kinematics, reduced joint reaction forces, and poorer dynamic balance.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.