Nurses' knowledge and attitudes about children maltreatment in Jordan: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Eman Abu Sabbah RN, Ph.D. , Nadin M. Abdel Razeq Ph.D., RN, NIDCAP.
{"title":"Nurses' knowledge and attitudes about children maltreatment in Jordan: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Eman Abu Sabbah RN, Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Nadin M. Abdel Razeq Ph.D., RN, NIDCAP.","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2025.02.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine nurses' knowledge and attitudes, and the factors influencing them regarding managing child maltreatment in Jordan's acute and primary care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Nurses (<em>n</em> = 523, 84 % female) caring for children in Jordan's acute and primary healthcare settings completed the Child Abuse Report Intention Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean total score of knowledge items was 4.9 (SD =2.6) out of 13. The mean total attitudes score towards protecting children from suspected maltreatment was 78.6 (SD = 12.27) out of 108. Only 42 % of the nurses intended to screen for child maltreatment in their practice, and 15 % did not consider children's physical punishment a form of maltreatment. Additionally, 66 % of nurses reported that each case of child maltreatment should be reported to the authorities, and 68 % indicated that they should advocate for abused children.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The significantly insufficient knowledge and fair attitude of nurses towards child maltreatment revealed by this study raises concerns regarding their preparedness for child protection in clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>The findings underscore the critical need for interventions to strengthen nurses' capacities to practice protective and advocacy roles in cases of child maltreatment in clinical settings. Such interventions have the potential to enhance child protection significantly. Stakeholders, such as healthcare administrators, play a key role in shaping the policies and practices. They can better address the limited nurses' knowledge and attitude issues and work towards fostering a safer environment for screening for and reporting child maltreatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 130-138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596325000673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine nurses' knowledge and attitudes, and the factors influencing them regarding managing child maltreatment in Jordan's acute and primary care settings.

Methods

This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. Nurses (n = 523, 84 % female) caring for children in Jordan's acute and primary healthcare settings completed the Child Abuse Report Intention Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data.

Results

The mean total score of knowledge items was 4.9 (SD =2.6) out of 13. The mean total attitudes score towards protecting children from suspected maltreatment was 78.6 (SD = 12.27) out of 108. Only 42 % of the nurses intended to screen for child maltreatment in their practice, and 15 % did not consider children's physical punishment a form of maltreatment. Additionally, 66 % of nurses reported that each case of child maltreatment should be reported to the authorities, and 68 % indicated that they should advocate for abused children.

Conclusion

The significantly insufficient knowledge and fair attitude of nurses towards child maltreatment revealed by this study raises concerns regarding their preparedness for child protection in clinical practice.

Practice implications

The findings underscore the critical need for interventions to strengthen nurses' capacities to practice protective and advocacy roles in cases of child maltreatment in clinical settings. Such interventions have the potential to enhance child protection significantly. Stakeholders, such as healthcare administrators, play a key role in shaping the policies and practices. They can better address the limited nurses' knowledge and attitude issues and work towards fostering a safer environment for screening for and reporting child maltreatment.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信