Revisiting oil and tanker shipping markets: The role of geopolitical risk in shaping spillover dynamics

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Shuiyang Chen , Siting Hao , Bin Meng , Yajing Zhang , Haibo Kuang
{"title":"Revisiting oil and tanker shipping markets: The role of geopolitical risk in shaping spillover dynamics","authors":"Shuiyang Chen ,&nbsp;Siting Hao ,&nbsp;Bin Meng ,&nbsp;Yajing Zhang ,&nbsp;Haibo Kuang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the dynamic relationship between the crude oil and tanker shipping markets under geopolitical risk shocks, focusing on the differential impacts of threat-based and action-based geopolitical risks, as well as supply-demand disruptions. We employ the VAR-BEKK-GARCH model to capture spillover dynamics and their variations before and after geopolitical shocks, while the TVP-SV-VAR model provides a novel approach to visualize the intensity, direction, and duration of the effects of geopolitical risks over time. Our findings contribute to the understanding of altered market interactions under geopolitical risks by distinguishing between threat-based and action-based shocks, as well as analyzing the asymmetric impacts of supply-side and demand-side disruptions. Specifically, geopolitical risk is found to significantly amplify volatility spillovers from the BDTI to the crude oil market (+6.91 %), while reducing the reverse spillover (−14.92 %). Threat-based risks enhance bidirectional spillovers between crude oil and BCTI, while action-based risks dampen these spillovers. Furthermore, action-based risks have a more persistent effect, whereas threat-based risks induce a stronger, short-term response. Geopolitical risks impact correlations and hedge ratios, affecting diversification and portfolio allocation. These results emphasize the need to differentiate geopolitical risks, offering insights for energy policy, shipping resource allocation, and cross-market risk management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"321 ","pages":"Article 135494"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225011363","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the dynamic relationship between the crude oil and tanker shipping markets under geopolitical risk shocks, focusing on the differential impacts of threat-based and action-based geopolitical risks, as well as supply-demand disruptions. We employ the VAR-BEKK-GARCH model to capture spillover dynamics and their variations before and after geopolitical shocks, while the TVP-SV-VAR model provides a novel approach to visualize the intensity, direction, and duration of the effects of geopolitical risks over time. Our findings contribute to the understanding of altered market interactions under geopolitical risks by distinguishing between threat-based and action-based shocks, as well as analyzing the asymmetric impacts of supply-side and demand-side disruptions. Specifically, geopolitical risk is found to significantly amplify volatility spillovers from the BDTI to the crude oil market (+6.91 %), while reducing the reverse spillover (−14.92 %). Threat-based risks enhance bidirectional spillovers between crude oil and BCTI, while action-based risks dampen these spillovers. Furthermore, action-based risks have a more persistent effect, whereas threat-based risks induce a stronger, short-term response. Geopolitical risks impact correlations and hedge ratios, affecting diversification and portfolio allocation. These results emphasize the need to differentiate geopolitical risks, offering insights for energy policy, shipping resource allocation, and cross-market risk management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信