Predicting the spatial distribution of organic carbon in soil by combining machine learning algorithms and spline depth function in a part of Golestan Province, Iran

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Maryam Emami , Farhad Khormali , Mohammad Reza Pahlavan-Rad , Soheila Ebrahimi
{"title":"Predicting the spatial distribution of organic carbon in soil by combining machine learning algorithms and spline depth function in a part of Golestan Province, Iran","authors":"Maryam Emami ,&nbsp;Farhad Khormali ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Pahlavan-Rad ,&nbsp;Soheila Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As a critical element of soil quality, soil organic carbon (SOC) constitutes nearly 75 % of the active carbon content in terrestrial ecosystems and is essential for agricultural productivity. Estimation of soil organic carbon is one of the requirements of effective soil management planning. The present paper aimed to test the performance of Cubist (Cu), Quantile Regression Forest (QRF), and Random Forest (RF) methods in predicting the distribution of SOC content at four soil depths of 0–15, 15–30, 30–60 and 60–100 cm in Golestan Province of Iran. To achieve this goal, the mentioned models were trained with 105 soil profiles across the study area using environmental covariates which had been obtained from DEM, rain and piezometric maps, and remote sensing data extracted from Landsat 7 ETM<sup>+</sup>. Results revealed that the mean SOC values varied between 0.39 % and 1.24 %. All three predictive models had the highest performance in predicting SOC at 15–30 cm depth (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.45, RMSE = 0.34, and MAE = 0.25). Although the predictive models were similar in terms of validation metrics criteria (R<sup>2</sup>, RMSE, and MAE), the QRF predictions based on the Taylor diagram had a higher agreement with the measured SOC distribution, resulting in the identification of QRF as the leading model in performance. Results of the present paper indicate the high potential of rainfall, piezometric, MRVBF, MRRTF, and valley depth to predict SOC concentration distributions. These findings will contribute to further research on SOC prediction models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106530"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725000844","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a critical element of soil quality, soil organic carbon (SOC) constitutes nearly 75 % of the active carbon content in terrestrial ecosystems and is essential for agricultural productivity. Estimation of soil organic carbon is one of the requirements of effective soil management planning. The present paper aimed to test the performance of Cubist (Cu), Quantile Regression Forest (QRF), and Random Forest (RF) methods in predicting the distribution of SOC content at four soil depths of 0–15, 15–30, 30–60 and 60–100 cm in Golestan Province of Iran. To achieve this goal, the mentioned models were trained with 105 soil profiles across the study area using environmental covariates which had been obtained from DEM, rain and piezometric maps, and remote sensing data extracted from Landsat 7 ETM+. Results revealed that the mean SOC values varied between 0.39 % and 1.24 %. All three predictive models had the highest performance in predicting SOC at 15–30 cm depth (R2 = 0.45, RMSE = 0.34, and MAE = 0.25). Although the predictive models were similar in terms of validation metrics criteria (R2, RMSE, and MAE), the QRF predictions based on the Taylor diagram had a higher agreement with the measured SOC distribution, resulting in the identification of QRF as the leading model in performance. Results of the present paper indicate the high potential of rainfall, piezometric, MRVBF, MRRTF, and valley depth to predict SOC concentration distributions. These findings will contribute to further research on SOC prediction models.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信