Evaluating e-bike safety at unsignalized roundabouts using a Bayesian mixed logit model

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Dexue Kong , Cunbao Zhang , Feng Chen , Chun Li
{"title":"Evaluating e-bike safety at unsignalized roundabouts using a Bayesian mixed logit model","authors":"Dexue Kong ,&nbsp;Cunbao Zhang ,&nbsp;Feng Chen ,&nbsp;Chun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Roundabouts are a unique intersection design for calming traffic and improving vehicle safety without traffic signal control. While a few past studies have examined the impact of the roundabout on bicyclist and pedestrian injury crashes, little is known about its effect on the safety of electric bike (e-bike) riders. This study uses a Bayesian mixed logit model to quantify the impact of roundabout geometry, traffic flow and conflict characteristics on the severity of e-bike-vehicle conflicts. Surrogate safety indicators were used to measure the severity of conflicts. Statistical results show that the main safety issue at unsignalized roundabouts is conflicts between entering e-bike riders and vehicles, with a high propensity for serious conflicts, followed by exiting conflict. Marginal effects of the combined best-fit model showed that the probability of slight and no conflicts increased as the diameter of the roundabout increased, while an increase in the number of lanes could lead to a higher probability of serious conflicts. Whether e-bikes or vehicles, an increase in speed increases the probability of serious and slight conflicts, while high traffic volumes show the opposite effect. In addition, conflict severity reduced with additional factors of conflict characteristics compared to no conflict. The combined best fit model performs well in the validation dataset with a prediction accuracy of 67.1 % and better performance for the exiting conflict and entering conflict models. These findings can be used to assess e-bike safety at unsignalized roundabouts without dedicated e-bike facilities and to enhance safety through targeted measures such as driver and e-bike rider education, the implementation of dedicated or shared lanes, and speed limits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 108004"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525000909","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Roundabouts are a unique intersection design for calming traffic and improving vehicle safety without traffic signal control. While a few past studies have examined the impact of the roundabout on bicyclist and pedestrian injury crashes, little is known about its effect on the safety of electric bike (e-bike) riders. This study uses a Bayesian mixed logit model to quantify the impact of roundabout geometry, traffic flow and conflict characteristics on the severity of e-bike-vehicle conflicts. Surrogate safety indicators were used to measure the severity of conflicts. Statistical results show that the main safety issue at unsignalized roundabouts is conflicts between entering e-bike riders and vehicles, with a high propensity for serious conflicts, followed by exiting conflict. Marginal effects of the combined best-fit model showed that the probability of slight and no conflicts increased as the diameter of the roundabout increased, while an increase in the number of lanes could lead to a higher probability of serious conflicts. Whether e-bikes or vehicles, an increase in speed increases the probability of serious and slight conflicts, while high traffic volumes show the opposite effect. In addition, conflict severity reduced with additional factors of conflict characteristics compared to no conflict. The combined best fit model performs well in the validation dataset with a prediction accuracy of 67.1 % and better performance for the exiting conflict and entering conflict models. These findings can be used to assess e-bike safety at unsignalized roundabouts without dedicated e-bike facilities and to enhance safety through targeted measures such as driver and e-bike rider education, the implementation of dedicated or shared lanes, and speed limits.
环岛是一种独特的交叉口设计,可在没有交通信号控制的情况下疏导交通并提高车辆安全性。过去有一些研究探讨了环岛对自行车和行人伤害事故的影响,但对其对电动自行车(e-bike)骑行者安全的影响却知之甚少。本研究采用贝叶斯混合对数模型来量化环岛几何形状、交通流量和冲突特征对电动自行车与车辆冲突严重程度的影响。代用安全指标用于衡量冲突的严重程度。统计结果表明,无信号环岛的主要安全问题是进入环岛的电动自行车骑行者与车辆之间的冲突,严重冲突的倾向性很高,其次是退出冲突。综合最佳拟合模型的边际效应显示,随着环岛直径的增加,发生轻微冲突和无冲突的概率也会增加,而车道数的增加则会导致发生严重冲突的概率增加。无论是电动自行车还是车辆,车速的增加都会增加发生严重和轻微冲突的概率,而高车流量则显示出相反的效果。此外,与无冲突相比,冲突的严重程度会随着冲突特征因素的增加而降低。综合最佳拟合模型在验证数据集中表现良好,预测准确率为 67.1%,退出冲突和进入冲突模型的表现更好。这些研究结果可用于评估无信号灯、无电动自行车专用设施的环岛的电动自行车安全,并通过有针对性的措施(如驾驶员和电动自行车骑行者教育、专用或共用车道的实施以及限速)来提高安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信