Green credit policy and corporate green innovation

IF 4.8 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jiale He , Haozhong Xue , Wei Yang , Yanyi Zhong , Bingyu Fan
{"title":"Green credit policy and corporate green innovation","authors":"Jiale He ,&nbsp;Haozhong Xue ,&nbsp;Wei Yang ,&nbsp;Yanyi Zhong ,&nbsp;Bingyu Fan","doi":"10.1016/j.iref.2025.104031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how Green Credit Policy (GCP) influences corporate green innovation (GI) through a comprehensive empirical analysis of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with 29,122 firm-year observations, we document that the implementation of Green Credit Guidelines in 2012 significantly enhances firms’ environmental innovation output, with the causal relationship validated through parallel trends analysis, placebo tests, and propensity score matching. Our investigation reveals two key financial mechanisms: GCP promotes green innovation by alleviating financing constraints and reducing financing costs, creating a supportive environment for environmental technology development. Additionally, digital transformation positively moderates this relationship, indicating that firms with superior digital capabilities respond more effectively to environmental credit policies. Further, a heterogeneity analysis shows that GCP has a stronger impact on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs, suggesting that government-controlled firms align more closely with national sustainability goals. Industry variations also emerge, with non-heavy polluted industries benefiting more from GCP, while firms in high-pollution sectors experience weaker innovation effects, likely due to compliance-driven financial reallocation rather than proactive sustainability investments. These findings contribute to understanding how financial regulations drive corporate environmental innovation, emphasizing the role of firm characteristics and industry dynamics in shaping policy effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14444,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics & Finance","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 104031"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025001947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how Green Credit Policy (GCP) influences corporate green innovation (GI) through a comprehensive empirical analysis of Chinese listed firms from 2009 to 2022. Employing a difference-in-differences approach with 29,122 firm-year observations, we document that the implementation of Green Credit Guidelines in 2012 significantly enhances firms’ environmental innovation output, with the causal relationship validated through parallel trends analysis, placebo tests, and propensity score matching. Our investigation reveals two key financial mechanisms: GCP promotes green innovation by alleviating financing constraints and reducing financing costs, creating a supportive environment for environmental technology development. Additionally, digital transformation positively moderates this relationship, indicating that firms with superior digital capabilities respond more effectively to environmental credit policies. Further, a heterogeneity analysis shows that GCP has a stronger impact on state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs, suggesting that government-controlled firms align more closely with national sustainability goals. Industry variations also emerge, with non-heavy polluted industries benefiting more from GCP, while firms in high-pollution sectors experience weaker innovation effects, likely due to compliance-driven financial reallocation rather than proactive sustainability investments. These findings contribute to understanding how financial regulations drive corporate environmental innovation, emphasizing the role of firm characteristics and industry dynamics in shaping policy effectiveness.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.20%
发文量
253
期刊介绍: The International Review of Economics & Finance (IREF) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of high quality theoretical and empirical articles in all areas of international economics, macroeconomics and financial economics. Contributions that facilitate the communications between the real and the financial sectors of the economy are of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信