Motor learning-based clinical pilates training for the Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation @Parkinsonpilates: A parallel group, randomised controlled trial with 3-month follow-up

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Fahriye Coban , Beliz Belgen Kaygisiz , Ferda Selcuk
{"title":"Motor learning-based clinical pilates training for the Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation @Parkinsonpilates: A parallel group, randomised controlled trial with 3-month follow-up","authors":"Fahriye Coban ,&nbsp;Beliz Belgen Kaygisiz ,&nbsp;Ferda Selcuk","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2025.103161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the effect of integrated motor learning clinical pilates protocol we developed for patients with Parkinson’s Disease (pwPD) on providing enduring motor skills in walking, balance, reaction time, cadence, and functional mobility at 3-months follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT).</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>XXX Medical Center, XXX, and XXX Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center, Nicosia.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>32 pwPD with Hoehn&amp;Yahr stages 2–3 were randomly assigned to the Parkinsonpilates Group (PP) and the Conventional Physiotherapy (CP) Group.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Both groups received 60 min of training, twice a week, and a home physiotherapy program 4 times a week, for 12 weeks. The intervention group received PP, while the CP group received general physiotherapy training for PD.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>The primary outcomes were untimed Gait and Balance Scale, Cadence, and Nelson Foot Reaction Test scores. The secondary outcomes were The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III subscales, Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test, and Berg Balance Scale. Outcomes were convened 4 times: pre-test, 6. weeks, post-treatment, and after 3-month follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At post-test, gait and balance, reaction time, functional mobility, static and dynamic balance showed a significant improvement in PP compared to CP, and the motor examination was similar(p &gt; .05). In addition to these results at follow-up, functional mobility was similar(p &gt; .05) and cadence(p &lt; .05) showed a significant improvement in PP. In addition, according to pairwise comparisons, the PP showed a significant improvement in cadence and reaction time in all 4 measures compared to CP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>More studies are needed to clarify the effects of the program we developed for PD. It should not be ignored that our protocol can be improved again according to the suggestions of future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 103161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229925000366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the effect of integrated motor learning clinical pilates protocol we developed for patients with Parkinson’s Disease (pwPD) on providing enduring motor skills in walking, balance, reaction time, cadence, and functional mobility at 3-months follow-up.

Design

A parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Setting

XXX Medical Center, XXX, and XXX Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Center, Nicosia.

Participants

32 pwPD with Hoehn&Yahr stages 2–3 were randomly assigned to the Parkinsonpilates Group (PP) and the Conventional Physiotherapy (CP) Group.

Interventions

Both groups received 60 min of training, twice a week, and a home physiotherapy program 4 times a week, for 12 weeks. The intervention group received PP, while the CP group received general physiotherapy training for PD.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcomes were untimed Gait and Balance Scale, Cadence, and Nelson Foot Reaction Test scores. The secondary outcomes were The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III subscales, Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Reach Test, and Berg Balance Scale. Outcomes were convened 4 times: pre-test, 6. weeks, post-treatment, and after 3-month follow-up.

Results

At post-test, gait and balance, reaction time, functional mobility, static and dynamic balance showed a significant improvement in PP compared to CP, and the motor examination was similar(p > .05). In addition to these results at follow-up, functional mobility was similar(p > .05) and cadence(p < .05) showed a significant improvement in PP. In addition, according to pairwise comparisons, the PP showed a significant improvement in cadence and reaction time in all 4 measures compared to CP.

Conclusions

More studies are needed to clarify the effects of the program we developed for PD. It should not be ignored that our protocol can be improved again according to the suggestions of future studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信