Operationalizing equity in nature-based coastal adaptation: Assessing practitioner perspectives from the San Francisco Bay Area, California

Olivia M. Won , Katherine L. Seto
{"title":"Operationalizing equity in nature-based coastal adaptation: Assessing practitioner perspectives from the San Francisco Bay Area, California","authors":"Olivia M. Won ,&nbsp;Katherine L. Seto","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal regions are faced with rising sea levels as well as other coastal hazards caused by climate change. As coastal areas begin adapting shorelines to present and future impacts, planners and land managers are increasingly encouraged to pursue nature-based coastal adaptation (NBCA) approaches as opposed to traditional gray infrastructure solutions. Recent policies also emphasize the importance of centering social equity and environmental justice in climate change adaptation initiatives, calling for increased community engagement and the prioritization of project work in disadvantaged communities. Though NBCA and equity-led approaches are growing more mainstream, to date, no empirical work has investigated how practitioners are currently framing and operationalizing concepts of equity in the burgeoning field of practice. Using an analytic of multiple framings of equity, this study describes how practitioners are currently addressing social equity in NBCA projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, a densely populated and highly urbanized estuary in Northern California. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 individuals involved in NBCA projects and planning work across the region, including representatives from government agencies, community-based organizations, and consulting groups. We found that practitioners are overwhelmingly focused on strategies to address distributive and procedural inequities. A minority of practitioners applied contextual, management, and Indigenous sovereignty frames of equity, which depend on larger structural shifts in governance, funding models, shoreline property regimes, and land repatriation and require more NBCA-specific approaches. This study demonstrates the importance of sustaining and increasing attention to multiple dimensions of equity in NBCA planning, particularly those that are currently underrepresented in practitioners’ scopes. We argue for developing specific equity interventions that address the unique challenges of integrating nature into urban coastal adaptation and offer recommendations for practitioners seeking to better operationalize multiple frames of equity in NBCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal regions are faced with rising sea levels as well as other coastal hazards caused by climate change. As coastal areas begin adapting shorelines to present and future impacts, planners and land managers are increasingly encouraged to pursue nature-based coastal adaptation (NBCA) approaches as opposed to traditional gray infrastructure solutions. Recent policies also emphasize the importance of centering social equity and environmental justice in climate change adaptation initiatives, calling for increased community engagement and the prioritization of project work in disadvantaged communities. Though NBCA and equity-led approaches are growing more mainstream, to date, no empirical work has investigated how practitioners are currently framing and operationalizing concepts of equity in the burgeoning field of practice. Using an analytic of multiple framings of equity, this study describes how practitioners are currently addressing social equity in NBCA projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, a densely populated and highly urbanized estuary in Northern California. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 individuals involved in NBCA projects and planning work across the region, including representatives from government agencies, community-based organizations, and consulting groups. We found that practitioners are overwhelmingly focused on strategies to address distributive and procedural inequities. A minority of practitioners applied contextual, management, and Indigenous sovereignty frames of equity, which depend on larger structural shifts in governance, funding models, shoreline property regimes, and land repatriation and require more NBCA-specific approaches. This study demonstrates the importance of sustaining and increasing attention to multiple dimensions of equity in NBCA planning, particularly those that are currently underrepresented in practitioners’ scopes. We argue for developing specific equity interventions that address the unique challenges of integrating nature into urban coastal adaptation and offer recommendations for practitioners seeking to better operationalize multiple frames of equity in NBCA.
在基于自然的沿海适应中实现公平:评估来自加利福尼亚州旧金山湾区的从业者观点
沿海地区面临着海平面上升以及气候变化造成的其他沿海灾害。随着沿海地区开始调整海岸线以适应当前和未来的影响,规划者和土地管理者越来越多地被鼓励采用基于自然的沿海适应(NBCA)方法,而不是传统的灰色基础设施解决方案。近期的政策还强调了将社会公平和环境正义置于气候变化适应举措中心的重要性,呼吁加强社区参与,并优先考虑弱势社区的项目工作。尽管NBCA和股权主导的方法正变得越来越主流,但迄今为止,还没有实证工作调查从业人员目前如何在新兴的实践领域中构建和实施股权概念。通过对多种公平框架的分析,本研究描述了从业者目前如何在旧金山湾区的NBCA项目中解决社会公平问题,旧金山湾区是北加州人口密集和高度城市化的河口。我们对30位参与该地区NBCA项目和规划工作的个人进行了半结构化访谈,其中包括来自政府机构、社区组织和咨询团体的代表。我们发现,从业者绝大多数都集中在解决分配和程序不公平的策略上。少数从业人员应用了背景、管理和土著主权框架的公平,这取决于治理、融资模式、海岸线财产制度和土地归还的更大结构转变,需要更多nbca特定的方法。这项研究表明,在NBCA规划中,保持和增加对公平的多个维度的关注是非常重要的,特别是那些目前在从业者范围内代表性不足的方面。我们主张制定具体的公平干预措施,以解决将自然融入城市沿海适应的独特挑战,并为寻求在NBCA中更好地实施多种公平框架的从业者提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信