Harold Alderman , Elisabetta Aurino , Priscilla Twumasi Baffour , Aulo Gelli , Festus Ebo Turkson , Brad Wong
{"title":"Assessing the overall benefits of programs enhancing human capital and equity: a new method with an application to school meals","authors":"Harold Alderman , Elisabetta Aurino , Priscilla Twumasi Baffour , Aulo Gelli , Festus Ebo Turkson , Brad Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Poverty reduction and nutrition are often joint outcomes of many public policies and programs which have education as their primary outcome. Quantification of overall benefits for these programs in a common metric is challenging. We propose a new method to incorporate distributional benefits from poverty reduction into standard education economic evaluations. We apply this to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating a large-scale school feeding program in Ghana. We first map effect sizes from the RCT in learning-adjusted years of schooling. We then convert these into long-term monetary gains from increased learning, to which we finally add the distributional benefits under different scenarios of inequality aversion preferences. We show that the program has substantial long-term economic gains. While these primarily stem from improved human capital, depending on different scenarios, up to half of total benefits are driven by current gains from the social protection transfer. Beyond school meals, our methodology is relevant to programs that have impacts covering both human capital and distributional benefits, and to economic evaluations beyond education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775725000263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Poverty reduction and nutrition are often joint outcomes of many public policies and programs which have education as their primary outcome. Quantification of overall benefits for these programs in a common metric is challenging. We propose a new method to incorporate distributional benefits from poverty reduction into standard education economic evaluations. We apply this to a randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating a large-scale school feeding program in Ghana. We first map effect sizes from the RCT in learning-adjusted years of schooling. We then convert these into long-term monetary gains from increased learning, to which we finally add the distributional benefits under different scenarios of inequality aversion preferences. We show that the program has substantial long-term economic gains. While these primarily stem from improved human capital, depending on different scenarios, up to half of total benefits are driven by current gains from the social protection transfer. Beyond school meals, our methodology is relevant to programs that have impacts covering both human capital and distributional benefits, and to economic evaluations beyond education.
期刊介绍:
Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.