Gender Differences in the Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Cardiometabolic Health: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Global journal of cardiovascular diseases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.31586/gjcd.2025.1198
Shervin Assari, Hossein Zare
{"title":"Gender Differences in the Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Cardiometabolic Health: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.","authors":"Shervin Assari, Hossein Zare","doi":"10.31586/gjcd.2025.1198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-established determinant of health, often associated with lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD). However, the extent to which SES influences CMD may vary by gender due to differences in social roles, health behaviors, and biological susceptibilities. This study examined the relationship between SES, measured by the poverty-to-income ratio (PIR), and CMD indicators-including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-among men and women using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized NHANES data (1999-2018), adjusting for race/ethnicity and age. SES was operationalized using PIR, with CMD outcomes (obesity, diabetes, and CVD) as dependent variables. Generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to evaluate the main effects of SES on CMD, with gender included as a moderator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher SES was associated with lower overall CMD risk. However, the protective effects of SES were more pronounced in women than in men for all outcomes. These findings suggest that gender-specific pathways may mediate the relationship between SES and CMD. Women may derive greater health benefits from higher SES due to factors such as reduced stress exposure, healthier behaviors, and increased healthcare utilization. Conversely, the weaker association observed in men may reflect differences in social hierarchy sensitivity, responses to unemployment, or other contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the importance of gender-specific considerations when addressing SES-related disparities in CMD outcomes. Policies and interventions aimed at reducing CMD burden should account for these gender differences to promote equitable improvements in cardiometabolic health. Further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms driving these differences and to inform targeted strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520306,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of cardiovascular diseases","volume":"4 1","pages":"50-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11887647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31586/gjcd.2025.1198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a well-established determinant of health, often associated with lower risk of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD). However, the extent to which SES influences CMD may vary by gender due to differences in social roles, health behaviors, and biological susceptibilities. This study examined the relationship between SES, measured by the poverty-to-income ratio (PIR), and CMD indicators-including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)-among men and women using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized NHANES data (1999-2018), adjusting for race/ethnicity and age. SES was operationalized using PIR, with CMD outcomes (obesity, diabetes, and CVD) as dependent variables. Generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to evaluate the main effects of SES on CMD, with gender included as a moderator.

Results: Higher SES was associated with lower overall CMD risk. However, the protective effects of SES were more pronounced in women than in men for all outcomes. These findings suggest that gender-specific pathways may mediate the relationship between SES and CMD. Women may derive greater health benefits from higher SES due to factors such as reduced stress exposure, healthier behaviors, and increased healthcare utilization. Conversely, the weaker association observed in men may reflect differences in social hierarchy sensitivity, responses to unemployment, or other contextual factors.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of gender-specific considerations when addressing SES-related disparities in CMD outcomes. Policies and interventions aimed at reducing CMD burden should account for these gender differences to promote equitable improvements in cardiometabolic health. Further research is needed to unravel the mechanisms driving these differences and to inform targeted strategies.

背景:社会经济地位(SES)是一个公认的健康决定因素,通常与较低的心脏代谢疾病(CMD)风险相关。然而,由于社会角色、健康行为和生物易感性的不同,SES 对 CMD 的影响程度可能因性别而异。本研究利用美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的数据,研究了以贫困与收入比(PIR)衡量的 SES 与 CMD 指标(包括肥胖、糖尿病和心血管疾病(CVD))之间的关系:这项横断面研究利用了 NHANES 数据(1999-2018 年),并对种族/人种和年龄进行了调整。SES采用PIR进行操作,CMD结果(肥胖、糖尿病和心血管疾病)为因变量。采用广义线性模型(GLM)来评估SES对CMD的主要影响,并将性别作为调节因素:结果:较高的社会经济地位与较低的总体慢性阻塞性肺病风险相关。然而,在所有结果中,SES 对女性的保护作用都比对男性更明显。这些研究结果表明,性别特异性途径可能会调节社会经济地位与慢性阻塞性肺病之间的关系。女性可能会从较高的社会经济地位中获得更多的健康益处,原因包括压力暴露减少、行为更健康以及医疗保健利用率提高。相反,在男性中观察到的较弱关联可能反映了社会等级敏感性、对失业的反应或其他背景因素的差异:研究结果突出表明,在处理与社会经济地位相关的慢性阻塞性肺病结果差异时,必须考虑到性别差异。旨在减轻慢性阻塞性肺病负担的政策和干预措施应考虑到这些性别差异,以促进公平地改善心脏代谢健康。需要进一步开展研究,以揭示造成这些差异的机制,并为有针对性的策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信