Implementing enhanced recovery protocol to improve trauma laparotomy outcomes: A single-center pilot study.

Hayaki Uchino, William Davalan, Kosar Khwaja, Evan Wong, Jeremy Grushka
{"title":"Implementing enhanced recovery protocol to improve trauma laparotomy outcomes: A single-center pilot study.","authors":"Hayaki Uchino, William Davalan, Kosar Khwaja, Evan Wong, Jeremy Grushka","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) are designed to improve postoperative recovery. Since their inception, ERPs have become the standard of care across multiple surgical specialities, with numerous guidelines established for elective procedures. While ERP principles have been extended to emergency abdominal surgeries, their application in trauma laparotomy remains limited. This study details the development of an ERP tailored for trauma laparotomy patients and evaluates outcomes following its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary team developed an ERP, termed the Trauma Laparotomy Care Pathway (TLCP), grounded in best available evidence and adapted to our clinical setting through a rigorous consensus process. Following implementation, we conducted a single-center pilot study as part of a quality improvement initiative, comparing trauma laparotomy patients managed with TLCP from February to July 2024 to a historical cohort as the baseline group. We analyzed adherence to five key postoperative components and assessed impacts on postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first six months post-implementation, 31 patients were managed using TLCP. The median age was 32.0 years, with males comprising 87.1 % of patients. Stab wounds were the most frequent injury mechanism, followed by motor vehicle-related accidents and falls. Isolated abdominal injuries accounted for 64.5 % of cases. Adherence to key pathway components ranged from 54.5 % to 67.7 %. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the TLCP group, showing a two-day reduction compared to the historical cohort (4.0 days [3.5, 6.5] vs 6.0 days [4.0, 10.0], p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in in-hospital complications or 30-day readmission rates between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following TLCP implementation, a reduction in hospital length of stay was observed, with no apparent increase in complications or 30-day readmission rates. These findings suggest that ERPs may be applicable to selected trauma laparotomy patients, with the potential to improved clinical outcomes. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Enhanced Recovery Protocols (ERPs) are designed to improve postoperative recovery. Since their inception, ERPs have become the standard of care across multiple surgical specialities, with numerous guidelines established for elective procedures. While ERP principles have been extended to emergency abdominal surgeries, their application in trauma laparotomy remains limited. This study details the development of an ERP tailored for trauma laparotomy patients and evaluates outcomes following its implementation.

Methods: A multidisciplinary team developed an ERP, termed the Trauma Laparotomy Care Pathway (TLCP), grounded in best available evidence and adapted to our clinical setting through a rigorous consensus process. Following implementation, we conducted a single-center pilot study as part of a quality improvement initiative, comparing trauma laparotomy patients managed with TLCP from February to July 2024 to a historical cohort as the baseline group. We analyzed adherence to five key postoperative components and assessed impacts on postoperative outcomes.

Results: In the first six months post-implementation, 31 patients were managed using TLCP. The median age was 32.0 years, with males comprising 87.1 % of patients. Stab wounds were the most frequent injury mechanism, followed by motor vehicle-related accidents and falls. Isolated abdominal injuries accounted for 64.5 % of cases. Adherence to key pathway components ranged from 54.5 % to 67.7 %. The hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the TLCP group, showing a two-day reduction compared to the historical cohort (4.0 days [3.5, 6.5] vs 6.0 days [4.0, 10.0], p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in in-hospital complications or 30-day readmission rates between the groups.

Conclusion: Following TLCP implementation, a reduction in hospital length of stay was observed, with no apparent increase in complications or 30-day readmission rates. These findings suggest that ERPs may be applicable to selected trauma laparotomy patients, with the potential to improved clinical outcomes. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these results.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信