Analytical Validation of the High Concentrated Thrombin Time-To-Reptilase Time Ratio: A Proposed Assay for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Low Fibrinogen Levels.
{"title":"Analytical Validation of the High Concentrated Thrombin Time-To-Reptilase Time Ratio: A Proposed Assay for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin in Patients With Low Fibrinogen Levels.","authors":"Pornnapa Police, Phichchapha Noikongdee, Tichayapa Phojanasenee, Wittawat Chantkran, Dollapak Apipongrat","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the high-concentrated thrombin time-to-reptilase time (hcTT/RT) ratio as a novel assay to neutralize fibrinogen effects and improve accuracy in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring and to validate its use in clinical samples with low fibrinogen levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 240 heparin-spiked plasma samples, prepared from 30 normal plasma samples with varying UFH concentrations, were analyzed. The hcTT/RT ratio's correlation with anti-FXa activity and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with the hcTT assay. Additionally, 89 clinical samples from UFH-treated patients with low fibrinogen levels were analyzed to validate the assay in clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both hcTT and the hcTT/RT ratio demonstrated strong correlations with anti-FXa activity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76 and 0.75, respectively). The hcTT/RT ratio outperformed hcTT in detecting subtherapeutic UFH levels, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98, p < 0.001), greater sensitivity (89.2% vs. 86.7%), and perfect specificity (100.0% vs. 98.3%), with comparable performance for supratherapeutic UFH levels. Notably, the hcTT/RT ratio remained unaffected by low fibrinogen concentrations. In the validation study, the hcTT/RT ratio showed a stronger correlation with anti-FXa activity than activated partial thromboplastin time and hcTT alone (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72 vs. 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively) and had no significant correlation with fibrinogen levels (Spearman's r = -0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hcTT/RT ratio is a reliable assay for monitoring UFH, especially in patients with low fibrinogen levels. Further large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate its practical application in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94050,"journal":{"name":"International journal of laboratory hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of laboratory hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the high-concentrated thrombin time-to-reptilase time (hcTT/RT) ratio as a novel assay to neutralize fibrinogen effects and improve accuracy in unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring and to validate its use in clinical samples with low fibrinogen levels.
Methods: A total of 240 heparin-spiked plasma samples, prepared from 30 normal plasma samples with varying UFH concentrations, were analyzed. The hcTT/RT ratio's correlation with anti-FXa activity and its sensitivity and specificity were compared with the hcTT assay. Additionally, 89 clinical samples from UFH-treated patients with low fibrinogen levels were analyzed to validate the assay in clinical settings.
Results: Both hcTT and the hcTT/RT ratio demonstrated strong correlations with anti-FXa activity (R2 = 0.76 and 0.75, respectively). The hcTT/RT ratio outperformed hcTT in detecting subtherapeutic UFH levels, achieving higher diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.99 vs. 0.98, p < 0.001), greater sensitivity (89.2% vs. 86.7%), and perfect specificity (100.0% vs. 98.3%), with comparable performance for supratherapeutic UFH levels. Notably, the hcTT/RT ratio remained unaffected by low fibrinogen concentrations. In the validation study, the hcTT/RT ratio showed a stronger correlation with anti-FXa activity than activated partial thromboplastin time and hcTT alone (R2 = 0.72 vs. 0.63 and 0.72 vs. 0.67, respectively) and had no significant correlation with fibrinogen levels (Spearman's r = -0.01).
Conclusions: The hcTT/RT ratio is a reliable assay for monitoring UFH, especially in patients with low fibrinogen levels. Further large-scale clinical studies are needed to evaluate its practical application in clinical settings.