Validation of a fully automatic assessment of volume changes in the mandibular condyles following bimaxillary surgery.

M B Holte, N van Nistelrooij, S Vinayahalingam, S Bergé, T Xi, E M Pinholt
{"title":"Validation of a fully automatic assessment of volume changes in the mandibular condyles following bimaxillary surgery.","authors":"M B Holte, N van Nistelrooij, S Vinayahalingam, S Bergé, T Xi, E M Pinholt","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was performed to propose and validate a fully automatic assessment of volume changes in the mandibular condyles following orthognathic surgery. Two sets of cone beam computed tomography scans were included: one with segmentations of complete mandibles and the other with pre- and postoperative segmentations of the mandibular rami. Two convolutional neural networks predicted a segmentation of the mandible and its ramus segments. Each preoperative ramus segment was registered to the postoperative mandible, and the pre- and postoperative condylar volumes were determined. For validation, the agreement between the fully automatic assessment and a validated semi-automated method was calculated using mean absolute differences (MAD) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Forty condyles in 20 patients (16 female, four male; mean age 27.6 years) with maxillomandibular retrognathia, who underwent bimaxillary surgery, were assessed. A small difference in condylar volume change measurements was observed between the two methods (MAD 2.7%); the ICC, at 0.993, was excellent. The fully automatic method was considerably faster than the semi-automated method (3 min vs 30 min) and demonstrated high precision and excellent reliability for quantifying condylar volume changes. A fast and reliable assessment of condylar changes can identify volume changes sooner, leading to improved personalized patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was performed to propose and validate a fully automatic assessment of volume changes in the mandibular condyles following orthognathic surgery. Two sets of cone beam computed tomography scans were included: one with segmentations of complete mandibles and the other with pre- and postoperative segmentations of the mandibular rami. Two convolutional neural networks predicted a segmentation of the mandible and its ramus segments. Each preoperative ramus segment was registered to the postoperative mandible, and the pre- and postoperative condylar volumes were determined. For validation, the agreement between the fully automatic assessment and a validated semi-automated method was calculated using mean absolute differences (MAD) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Forty condyles in 20 patients (16 female, four male; mean age 27.6 years) with maxillomandibular retrognathia, who underwent bimaxillary surgery, were assessed. A small difference in condylar volume change measurements was observed between the two methods (MAD 2.7%); the ICC, at 0.993, was excellent. The fully automatic method was considerably faster than the semi-automated method (3 min vs 30 min) and demonstrated high precision and excellent reliability for quantifying condylar volume changes. A fast and reliable assessment of condylar changes can identify volume changes sooner, leading to improved personalized patient care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信