Stem Cell Mobilisation Failure in Auto HSCT and Its Factors: A Single Centre Experience.

Irsa Hidayat, Mehreen Ali Khan, Munazza Nabi Awan, Awais Siddiq, Sahla Riaz, Qudrat Ullah
{"title":"Stem Cell Mobilisation Failure in Auto HSCT and Its Factors: A Single Centre Experience.","authors":"Irsa Hidayat, Mehreen Ali Khan, Munazza Nabi Awan, Awais Siddiq, Sahla Riaz, Qudrat Ullah","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.03.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the mobilisation failure rate and identify its associated factors in this part of the world in order to identify patients at risk of mobilisation failure and to promptly explore alternative treatment.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Clinical Haematology, The Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 2014 to July 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Clinical records of 115 patients due for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto HSCT) and undergoing mobilisation regimen were analysed. Poor mobilisers were defined as patients who failed to achieve minimum PBSC collection of CD34 >2 x 106/kg of recipient body-weight or required an additional dose of Plerixafor after Cyclophosphamide GCSF mobilisation to achieve the target dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the mobilisation regimes, 85 (74%) were mobilised with Cyclophosphamide followed by GCSF (Cyclo-G), 28 (24%) with GCSF and Plerixafor (G-Plerixafor), and only 2 (2%) with GCSF alone. After the first mobilisation regimen, 84% of patients achieved PBSC collection of CD34 count of >2 x 10^6/kg. The entire mobilisation failure rate was 16%. Successful stem cell collection was significantly correlated with age, lymphoma group and its transplant indication, previous chemotherapy lines, exposure to the type of myelotoxic medicines, steady-state CD34 count, and use of Plerixafor. However, at multivariate analysis, only use of Plerixafor was found associated with successful mobilisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plerixafor significantly improved mobilisation regimens' yield and cost-effectiveness by greatly increasing mobilisation success rates, particularly in heavily pre-treated lymphoma patients.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation, Plerixafor, Lymphoma, Multiple myeloma, Plasma cell dyscrasias.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 3","pages":"367-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.03.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the mobilisation failure rate and identify its associated factors in this part of the world in order to identify patients at risk of mobilisation failure and to promptly explore alternative treatment.

Study design: A descriptive study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Clinical Haematology, The Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from January 2014 to July 2023.

Methodology: Clinical records of 115 patients due for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto HSCT) and undergoing mobilisation regimen were analysed. Poor mobilisers were defined as patients who failed to achieve minimum PBSC collection of CD34 >2 x 106/kg of recipient body-weight or required an additional dose of Plerixafor after Cyclophosphamide GCSF mobilisation to achieve the target dose.

Results: Among the mobilisation regimes, 85 (74%) were mobilised with Cyclophosphamide followed by GCSF (Cyclo-G), 28 (24%) with GCSF and Plerixafor (G-Plerixafor), and only 2 (2%) with GCSF alone. After the first mobilisation regimen, 84% of patients achieved PBSC collection of CD34 count of >2 x 10^6/kg. The entire mobilisation failure rate was 16%. Successful stem cell collection was significantly correlated with age, lymphoma group and its transplant indication, previous chemotherapy lines, exposure to the type of myelotoxic medicines, steady-state CD34 count, and use of Plerixafor. However, at multivariate analysis, only use of Plerixafor was found associated with successful mobilisation.

Conclusion: Plerixafor significantly improved mobilisation regimens' yield and cost-effectiveness by greatly increasing mobilisation success rates, particularly in heavily pre-treated lymphoma patients.

Key words: Haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation, Plerixafor, Lymphoma, Multiple myeloma, Plasma cell dyscrasias.

自体造血干细胞移植中干细胞动员失败及其影响因素:单中心经验。
目的:确定该地区的活动失败率及其相关因素,以便识别有活动失败风险的患者并及时探索替代治疗方法。研究设计:描述性研究。研究地点和时间:2014年1月至2023年7月,巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第武装部队骨髓移植中心临床血液科。方法:分析115例自体造血干细胞移植(auto hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HSCT)患者的临床资料。动员不良者被定义为未能达到最低PBSC收集CD34 /kg /kg或在环磷酰胺GCSF动员后需要额外剂量的普利沙福以达到目标剂量的患者。结果:在动员方案中,85例(74%)使用环磷酰胺和GCSF (cyclog), 28例(24%)使用GCSF和Plerixafor (G-Plerixafor),只有2例(2%)单独使用GCSF。在第一次动员方案后,84%的患者实现了PBSC收集CD34计数为bb0.2 × 10^6/kg。整个动员失败率为16%。成功的干细胞收集与年龄、淋巴瘤组及其移植指征、既往化疗系、暴露于骨髓毒性药物类型、稳态CD34计数和使用Plerixafor显著相关。然而,在多变量分析中,只有使用Plerixafor被发现与成功的活动有关。结论:Plerixafor通过大大提高动员成功率显著提高了动员方案的产量和成本效益,特别是在大量预先治疗的淋巴瘤患者中。关键词:造血干细胞动员,普利沙替,淋巴瘤,多发性骨髓瘤,浆细胞异常。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信